Alternative Medicine or "Alternative" Patients: A Qualitative Study of Patient-Oriented Decision-Making Processes with Respect to Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Opher Caspi, Mary S Koithan, Michael W. Criddle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Theory and clinical practice suggest that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) decision-making processes may differ from those used in conventional medicine. If so, understanding the differences could improve patient-provider communication around treatment options. Objectives. To examine patient-oriented decision-making processes relative to CAM use. Population. Adults with chronic rheumatological disorders who utilize allopathic medicine only, CAM only, or both. Method. An exploratory, cross-sectional naturalistic design with thematic and content analyses. Results. Three distinct decision paths were developed, differing substantially on the importance of provider trust, disease severity/prognosis, willingness to experiment, intuitive/spiritual factors, and outcomes evidence. Conclusions. These divergent decision paths indicate the possibility of "alternative patients," not just "alternative therapies." Since informed decisions, tailored to the patient, would likely lead to sustainable improvements in health care outcomes, the findings may facilitate providers' capacity to effectively advise patients about treatment alternatives and CAM use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-79
Number of pages16
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Decision Making
Medicine
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Decision making
  • Qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{b20ecf5851024a09aa9a341d173d1d37,
title = "Alternative Medicine or {"}Alternative{"} Patients: A Qualitative Study of Patient-Oriented Decision-Making Processes with Respect to Complementary and Alternative Medicine",
abstract = "Background. Theory and clinical practice suggest that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) decision-making processes may differ from those used in conventional medicine. If so, understanding the differences could improve patient-provider communication around treatment options. Objectives. To examine patient-oriented decision-making processes relative to CAM use. Population. Adults with chronic rheumatological disorders who utilize allopathic medicine only, CAM only, or both. Method. An exploratory, cross-sectional naturalistic design with thematic and content analyses. Results. Three distinct decision paths were developed, differing substantially on the importance of provider trust, disease severity/prognosis, willingness to experiment, intuitive/spiritual factors, and outcomes evidence. Conclusions. These divergent decision paths indicate the possibility of {"}alternative patients,{"} not just {"}alternative therapies.{"} Since informed decisions, tailored to the patient, would likely lead to sustainable improvements in health care outcomes, the findings may facilitate providers' capacity to effectively advise patients about treatment alternatives and CAM use.",
keywords = "Complementary and alternative medicine, Decision making, Qualitative methods",
author = "Opher Caspi and Koithan, {Mary S} and Criddle, {Michael W.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X03261567",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "64--79",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative Medicine or "Alternative" Patients

T2 - A Qualitative Study of Patient-Oriented Decision-Making Processes with Respect to Complementary and Alternative Medicine

AU - Caspi, Opher

AU - Koithan, Mary S

AU - Criddle, Michael W.

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Background. Theory and clinical practice suggest that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) decision-making processes may differ from those used in conventional medicine. If so, understanding the differences could improve patient-provider communication around treatment options. Objectives. To examine patient-oriented decision-making processes relative to CAM use. Population. Adults with chronic rheumatological disorders who utilize allopathic medicine only, CAM only, or both. Method. An exploratory, cross-sectional naturalistic design with thematic and content analyses. Results. Three distinct decision paths were developed, differing substantially on the importance of provider trust, disease severity/prognosis, willingness to experiment, intuitive/spiritual factors, and outcomes evidence. Conclusions. These divergent decision paths indicate the possibility of "alternative patients," not just "alternative therapies." Since informed decisions, tailored to the patient, would likely lead to sustainable improvements in health care outcomes, the findings may facilitate providers' capacity to effectively advise patients about treatment alternatives and CAM use.

AB - Background. Theory and clinical practice suggest that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) decision-making processes may differ from those used in conventional medicine. If so, understanding the differences could improve patient-provider communication around treatment options. Objectives. To examine patient-oriented decision-making processes relative to CAM use. Population. Adults with chronic rheumatological disorders who utilize allopathic medicine only, CAM only, or both. Method. An exploratory, cross-sectional naturalistic design with thematic and content analyses. Results. Three distinct decision paths were developed, differing substantially on the importance of provider trust, disease severity/prognosis, willingness to experiment, intuitive/spiritual factors, and outcomes evidence. Conclusions. These divergent decision paths indicate the possibility of "alternative patients," not just "alternative therapies." Since informed decisions, tailored to the patient, would likely lead to sustainable improvements in health care outcomes, the findings may facilitate providers' capacity to effectively advise patients about treatment alternatives and CAM use.

KW - Complementary and alternative medicine

KW - Decision making

KW - Qualitative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642443490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642443490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X03261567

DO - 10.1177/0272989X03261567

M3 - Article

C2 - 15005956

AN - SCOPUS:1642443490

VL - 24

SP - 64

EP - 79

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 1

ER -