Ambulatory monitoring of peak expiratory flow: Reproducibility and quality control

P. L. Enright, Duane L Sherrill, M. D. Lebowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Eighty-five children and 230 adults from a population study performed ambulatory peak flow readings three times a day for 1 to 2 weeks following a home visit. Three peak expiratory flow (PEF) readings were reported for each of 5,809 test sessions. Within each test session, the third maneuver most frequently (40% of the time) gave the highest PEF reading. This did not vary throughout the day. In subgroups of children and women with a history of asthma or asthma symptoms (hereinafter referred to as 'asthma'), the first maneuver during the evening test sessions more frequently gave the highest readings. However, maneuver-induced bronchospasm occurred during less than 5% of the test sessions in both subjects with asthma and in other subjects. The within test session PEF reproducibility was good: overall, the highest and second highest reading matched within one division (10 L/min) 73% of the time and within 30 L/min (9% of the reading) 95% of the time. The best reproducibility was noted after the first two days of testing, during evening and bedtime test sessions (vs morning), and in girls and men. In the group with at least 2 weeks of testing, the coefficient of repeatability (CR) for the week-to-week PEF lability index was 10% for healthy adults and 17% for healthy children. As expected, repeatability was not as good for adults with asthma (CR = 17%) and children with asthma (CR = 28%).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)657-661
Number of pages5
JournalChest
Volume107
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Monitoring
Quality Control
Reading
Asthma
Bronchial Spasm
House Calls
Population

Keywords

  • airway reactivity
  • asthma
  • lability
  • peak flow
  • test reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Ambulatory monitoring of peak expiratory flow : Reproducibility and quality control. / Enright, P. L.; Sherrill, Duane L; Lebowitz, M. D.

In: Chest, Vol. 107, No. 3, 1995, p. 657-661.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Enright, PL, Sherrill, DL & Lebowitz, MD 1995, 'Ambulatory monitoring of peak expiratory flow: Reproducibility and quality control', Chest, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 657-661.
Enright, P. L. ; Sherrill, Duane L ; Lebowitz, M. D. / Ambulatory monitoring of peak expiratory flow : Reproducibility and quality control. In: Chest. 1995 ; Vol. 107, No. 3. pp. 657-661.
@article{a4927971d63945fdb1e8663572e2d461,
title = "Ambulatory monitoring of peak expiratory flow: Reproducibility and quality control",
abstract = "Eighty-five children and 230 adults from a population study performed ambulatory peak flow readings three times a day for 1 to 2 weeks following a home visit. Three peak expiratory flow (PEF) readings were reported for each of 5,809 test sessions. Within each test session, the third maneuver most frequently (40{\%} of the time) gave the highest PEF reading. This did not vary throughout the day. In subgroups of children and women with a history of asthma or asthma symptoms (hereinafter referred to as 'asthma'), the first maneuver during the evening test sessions more frequently gave the highest readings. However, maneuver-induced bronchospasm occurred during less than 5{\%} of the test sessions in both subjects with asthma and in other subjects. The within test session PEF reproducibility was good: overall, the highest and second highest reading matched within one division (10 L/min) 73{\%} of the time and within 30 L/min (9{\%} of the reading) 95{\%} of the time. The best reproducibility was noted after the first two days of testing, during evening and bedtime test sessions (vs morning), and in girls and men. In the group with at least 2 weeks of testing, the coefficient of repeatability (CR) for the week-to-week PEF lability index was 10{\%} for healthy adults and 17{\%} for healthy children. As expected, repeatability was not as good for adults with asthma (CR = 17{\%}) and children with asthma (CR = 28{\%}).",
keywords = "airway reactivity, asthma, lability, peak flow, test reproducibility",
author = "Enright, {P. L.} and Sherrill, {Duane L} and Lebowitz, {M. D.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "657--661",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambulatory monitoring of peak expiratory flow

T2 - Reproducibility and quality control

AU - Enright, P. L.

AU - Sherrill, Duane L

AU - Lebowitz, M. D.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Eighty-five children and 230 adults from a population study performed ambulatory peak flow readings three times a day for 1 to 2 weeks following a home visit. Three peak expiratory flow (PEF) readings were reported for each of 5,809 test sessions. Within each test session, the third maneuver most frequently (40% of the time) gave the highest PEF reading. This did not vary throughout the day. In subgroups of children and women with a history of asthma or asthma symptoms (hereinafter referred to as 'asthma'), the first maneuver during the evening test sessions more frequently gave the highest readings. However, maneuver-induced bronchospasm occurred during less than 5% of the test sessions in both subjects with asthma and in other subjects. The within test session PEF reproducibility was good: overall, the highest and second highest reading matched within one division (10 L/min) 73% of the time and within 30 L/min (9% of the reading) 95% of the time. The best reproducibility was noted after the first two days of testing, during evening and bedtime test sessions (vs morning), and in girls and men. In the group with at least 2 weeks of testing, the coefficient of repeatability (CR) for the week-to-week PEF lability index was 10% for healthy adults and 17% for healthy children. As expected, repeatability was not as good for adults with asthma (CR = 17%) and children with asthma (CR = 28%).

AB - Eighty-five children and 230 adults from a population study performed ambulatory peak flow readings three times a day for 1 to 2 weeks following a home visit. Three peak expiratory flow (PEF) readings were reported for each of 5,809 test sessions. Within each test session, the third maneuver most frequently (40% of the time) gave the highest PEF reading. This did not vary throughout the day. In subgroups of children and women with a history of asthma or asthma symptoms (hereinafter referred to as 'asthma'), the first maneuver during the evening test sessions more frequently gave the highest readings. However, maneuver-induced bronchospasm occurred during less than 5% of the test sessions in both subjects with asthma and in other subjects. The within test session PEF reproducibility was good: overall, the highest and second highest reading matched within one division (10 L/min) 73% of the time and within 30 L/min (9% of the reading) 95% of the time. The best reproducibility was noted after the first two days of testing, during evening and bedtime test sessions (vs morning), and in girls and men. In the group with at least 2 weeks of testing, the coefficient of repeatability (CR) for the week-to-week PEF lability index was 10% for healthy adults and 17% for healthy children. As expected, repeatability was not as good for adults with asthma (CR = 17%) and children with asthma (CR = 28%).

KW - airway reactivity

KW - asthma

KW - lability

KW - peak flow

KW - test reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028957953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028957953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7874933

AN - SCOPUS:0028957953

VL - 107

SP - 657

EP - 661

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 3

ER -