Ambulatory system for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of gait and posture in chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation

A. Paraschiv-Ionescu, E. E. Buchser, B. Rutschmann, Bijan Najafi, K. Aminian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The physical activity in normal daily life is determined to a large extent by the functional ability of a subject. As a result, the measurement of the physical activity that a subject performs spontaneously could be a useful and objective measurement of disability, particularly in patients with disease-related functional impairment. The aim of this study is to provide an accurate method for the measurement and analysis of the physical activity under normal life conditions. Using three kinematical sensors strapped to the body, both the posture and the gait parameters can be assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. A detailed description of the algorithms used to analyse both the posture and the gait are presented in this paper. Two methods, based on different sensor configurations and signal processing, are proposed for the detection of sitting and standing postures (Methods P1 and P2). Two other methods are used for the quantitative assessment of walking (Methods W1 and W2). The performance of the algorithms (expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and error) is based on the comparison of data recorded simultaneously by a non-interfering observer (reference data) with the data provided by the recording system (21 patients, 61 h). Sensitivity and specificity are respectively 98.2% and 98.8% (P1), 97.8% and 98.1% (P2) for sitting; 98.0% and 98.5% (P1), 97.4% and 97.8% (P2) for standing; 97.1% and 97.9% (W1), 92.4% and 94.9% (W2) for walking; and finally, 99.2% and 98.6% for lying. Overall detection errors (as a percent of range) are as follows: 1.15% (P1) and 1.20% (P2) for sitting, 1.36% (P1) and 1.40% (P2) for standing, 1.20% (W1) and 1.60% (W2) for walking and 0.40% for lying. The error for the estimated walking distance and the speed is 6.8% and 9.6%, respectively. We conclude that both methods can be used for the accurate measurement of the basic physical activity in normal daily life. Measurements performed before and after the delivery of a treatment can therefore provide information of unprecedented accuracy and objectivity on the ability of a procedure, in this case spinal cord stimulation, to restore functional capabilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-125
Number of pages13
JournalGait and Posture
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Stimulation
Posture
Gait
Chronic Pain
Exercise
Walking
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Ambulatory system
  • Gait and posture analysis
  • Kinematical sensors
  • Spinal cord stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Ambulatory system for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of gait and posture in chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation. / Paraschiv-Ionescu, A.; Buchser, E. E.; Rutschmann, B.; Najafi, Bijan; Aminian, K.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 20, No. 2, 10.2004, p. 113-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fda572a676bf45978b040c8218b099ab,
title = "Ambulatory system for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of gait and posture in chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation",
abstract = "The physical activity in normal daily life is determined to a large extent by the functional ability of a subject. As a result, the measurement of the physical activity that a subject performs spontaneously could be a useful and objective measurement of disability, particularly in patients with disease-related functional impairment. The aim of this study is to provide an accurate method for the measurement and analysis of the physical activity under normal life conditions. Using three kinematical sensors strapped to the body, both the posture and the gait parameters can be assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. A detailed description of the algorithms used to analyse both the posture and the gait are presented in this paper. Two methods, based on different sensor configurations and signal processing, are proposed for the detection of sitting and standing postures (Methods P1 and P2). Two other methods are used for the quantitative assessment of walking (Methods W1 and W2). The performance of the algorithms (expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and error) is based on the comparison of data recorded simultaneously by a non-interfering observer (reference data) with the data provided by the recording system (21 patients, 61 h). Sensitivity and specificity are respectively 98.2{\%} and 98.8{\%} (P1), 97.8{\%} and 98.1{\%} (P2) for sitting; 98.0{\%} and 98.5{\%} (P1), 97.4{\%} and 97.8{\%} (P2) for standing; 97.1{\%} and 97.9{\%} (W1), 92.4{\%} and 94.9{\%} (W2) for walking; and finally, 99.2{\%} and 98.6{\%} for lying. Overall detection errors (as a percent of range) are as follows: 1.15{\%} (P1) and 1.20{\%} (P2) for sitting, 1.36{\%} (P1) and 1.40{\%} (P2) for standing, 1.20{\%} (W1) and 1.60{\%} (W2) for walking and 0.40{\%} for lying. The error for the estimated walking distance and the speed is 6.8{\%} and 9.6{\%}, respectively. We conclude that both methods can be used for the accurate measurement of the basic physical activity in normal daily life. Measurements performed before and after the delivery of a treatment can therefore provide information of unprecedented accuracy and objectivity on the ability of a procedure, in this case spinal cord stimulation, to restore functional capabilities.",
keywords = "Ambulatory system, Gait and posture analysis, Kinematical sensors, Spinal cord stimulation",
author = "A. Paraschiv-Ionescu and Buchser, {E. E.} and B. Rutschmann and Bijan Najafi and K. Aminian",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "113--125",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambulatory system for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of gait and posture in chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation

AU - Paraschiv-Ionescu, A.

AU - Buchser, E. E.

AU - Rutschmann, B.

AU - Najafi, Bijan

AU - Aminian, K.

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - The physical activity in normal daily life is determined to a large extent by the functional ability of a subject. As a result, the measurement of the physical activity that a subject performs spontaneously could be a useful and objective measurement of disability, particularly in patients with disease-related functional impairment. The aim of this study is to provide an accurate method for the measurement and analysis of the physical activity under normal life conditions. Using three kinematical sensors strapped to the body, both the posture and the gait parameters can be assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. A detailed description of the algorithms used to analyse both the posture and the gait are presented in this paper. Two methods, based on different sensor configurations and signal processing, are proposed for the detection of sitting and standing postures (Methods P1 and P2). Two other methods are used for the quantitative assessment of walking (Methods W1 and W2). The performance of the algorithms (expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and error) is based on the comparison of data recorded simultaneously by a non-interfering observer (reference data) with the data provided by the recording system (21 patients, 61 h). Sensitivity and specificity are respectively 98.2% and 98.8% (P1), 97.8% and 98.1% (P2) for sitting; 98.0% and 98.5% (P1), 97.4% and 97.8% (P2) for standing; 97.1% and 97.9% (W1), 92.4% and 94.9% (W2) for walking; and finally, 99.2% and 98.6% for lying. Overall detection errors (as a percent of range) are as follows: 1.15% (P1) and 1.20% (P2) for sitting, 1.36% (P1) and 1.40% (P2) for standing, 1.20% (W1) and 1.60% (W2) for walking and 0.40% for lying. The error for the estimated walking distance and the speed is 6.8% and 9.6%, respectively. We conclude that both methods can be used for the accurate measurement of the basic physical activity in normal daily life. Measurements performed before and after the delivery of a treatment can therefore provide information of unprecedented accuracy and objectivity on the ability of a procedure, in this case spinal cord stimulation, to restore functional capabilities.

AB - The physical activity in normal daily life is determined to a large extent by the functional ability of a subject. As a result, the measurement of the physical activity that a subject performs spontaneously could be a useful and objective measurement of disability, particularly in patients with disease-related functional impairment. The aim of this study is to provide an accurate method for the measurement and analysis of the physical activity under normal life conditions. Using three kinematical sensors strapped to the body, both the posture and the gait parameters can be assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. A detailed description of the algorithms used to analyse both the posture and the gait are presented in this paper. Two methods, based on different sensor configurations and signal processing, are proposed for the detection of sitting and standing postures (Methods P1 and P2). Two other methods are used for the quantitative assessment of walking (Methods W1 and W2). The performance of the algorithms (expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and error) is based on the comparison of data recorded simultaneously by a non-interfering observer (reference data) with the data provided by the recording system (21 patients, 61 h). Sensitivity and specificity are respectively 98.2% and 98.8% (P1), 97.8% and 98.1% (P2) for sitting; 98.0% and 98.5% (P1), 97.4% and 97.8% (P2) for standing; 97.1% and 97.9% (W1), 92.4% and 94.9% (W2) for walking; and finally, 99.2% and 98.6% for lying. Overall detection errors (as a percent of range) are as follows: 1.15% (P1) and 1.20% (P2) for sitting, 1.36% (P1) and 1.40% (P2) for standing, 1.20% (W1) and 1.60% (W2) for walking and 0.40% for lying. The error for the estimated walking distance and the speed is 6.8% and 9.6%, respectively. We conclude that both methods can be used for the accurate measurement of the basic physical activity in normal daily life. Measurements performed before and after the delivery of a treatment can therefore provide information of unprecedented accuracy and objectivity on the ability of a procedure, in this case spinal cord stimulation, to restore functional capabilities.

KW - Ambulatory system

KW - Gait and posture analysis

KW - Kinematical sensors

KW - Spinal cord stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344596524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344596524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.07.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 15336280

AN - SCOPUS:4344596524

VL - 20

SP - 113

EP - 125

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 2

ER -