AMS dating mammoth bones: Comparison with conventional dating

Yurij K. Vasil'Chuk, Alla C. Vasil'Chuk, Austin Long, A. J.T. Jull, D. J. Donahue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Fossilized Siberian mammoth remains are important indicators of environmental change in the Late Pleistocene. The NSF-Arizona AMS Laboratory radiocarbon results on amino acid separations compare well with mammoth bone collagen from the same specimens treated by HCl and dated by beta counting (the Russian Academy Geological Institute Radiocarbon Laboratory). Neither laboratory was aware of the other's dates for these comparisons. The results coincide very closely (a difference of 50-800 yr), and demonstrate that AMS dating provides a very good perspective for applications of past mammoth population studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-284
Number of pages4
JournalRadiocarbon
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'AMS dating mammoth bones: Comparison with conventional dating'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Vasil'Chuk, Y. K., Vasil'Chuk, A. C., Long, A., Jull, A. J. T., & Donahue, D. J. (2000). AMS dating mammoth bones: Comparison with conventional dating. Radiocarbon, 42(2), 281-284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200059087