An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science

Karl B Kern, Terence D Valenzuela, Lani L. Clark, Robert A. Berg, Ronald W. Hilwig, Marc D Berg, Charles W Otto, Daniel Newburn, Gordon A. Ewy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stagnant survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain a great impetus for advancing resuscitation science. International resuscitation guidelines, with all their advantages for standardizing resuscitation therapeutic protocols, can be difficult to change. A formalized evidence-based process has been adopted by the International Liason Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in formulating such guidelines. Currently, randomized clinical trials are considered optimal evidence, and very few major changes in the Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care are made without such. An alternative approach is to allow externally controlled clinical trials more weight in Guideline formulation and resuscitation protocol adoption. In Tucson, Arizona (USA), the Fire Department cardiac arrest database has revealed a number of resuscitation issues. These include a poor bystander CPR rate, a lack of response to initial defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation, and substantial time without chest compressions during the resuscitation effort. A local change in our previous resuscitation protocols had been instituted based upon this historical database information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-268
Number of pages8
JournalResuscitation
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Guidelines
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Databases
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Controlled Clinical Trials
Emergency Medical Services
Ventricular Fibrillation
Heart Arrest
Thorax
Randomized Controlled Trials
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Chest compressions
  • Defibrillation
  • Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science. / Kern, Karl B; Valenzuela, Terence D; Clark, Lani L.; Berg, Robert A.; Hilwig, Ronald W.; Berg, Marc D; Otto, Charles W; Newburn, Daniel; Ewy, Gordon A.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 64, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 261-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kern, Karl B ; Valenzuela, Terence D ; Clark, Lani L. ; Berg, Robert A. ; Hilwig, Ronald W. ; Berg, Marc D ; Otto, Charles W ; Newburn, Daniel ; Ewy, Gordon A. / An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science. In: Resuscitation. 2005 ; Vol. 64, No. 3. pp. 261-268.
@article{f0888a0afce64ee4b7a923f0640a738d,
title = "An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science",
abstract = "Stagnant survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain a great impetus for advancing resuscitation science. International resuscitation guidelines, with all their advantages for standardizing resuscitation therapeutic protocols, can be difficult to change. A formalized evidence-based process has been adopted by the International Liason Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in formulating such guidelines. Currently, randomized clinical trials are considered optimal evidence, and very few major changes in the Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care are made without such. An alternative approach is to allow externally controlled clinical trials more weight in Guideline formulation and resuscitation protocol adoption. In Tucson, Arizona (USA), the Fire Department cardiac arrest database has revealed a number of resuscitation issues. These include a poor bystander CPR rate, a lack of response to initial defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation, and substantial time without chest compressions during the resuscitation effort. A local change in our previous resuscitation protocols had been instituted based upon this historical database information.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Chest compressions, Defibrillation, Guidelines",
author = "Kern, {Karl B} and Valenzuela, {Terence D} and Clark, {Lani L.} and Berg, {Robert A.} and Hilwig, {Ronald W.} and Berg, {Marc D} and Otto, {Charles W} and Daniel Newburn and Ewy, {Gordon A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.08.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "261--268",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science

AU - Kern, Karl B

AU - Valenzuela, Terence D

AU - Clark, Lani L.

AU - Berg, Robert A.

AU - Hilwig, Ronald W.

AU - Berg, Marc D

AU - Otto, Charles W

AU - Newburn, Daniel

AU - Ewy, Gordon A.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Stagnant survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain a great impetus for advancing resuscitation science. International resuscitation guidelines, with all their advantages for standardizing resuscitation therapeutic protocols, can be difficult to change. A formalized evidence-based process has been adopted by the International Liason Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in formulating such guidelines. Currently, randomized clinical trials are considered optimal evidence, and very few major changes in the Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care are made without such. An alternative approach is to allow externally controlled clinical trials more weight in Guideline formulation and resuscitation protocol adoption. In Tucson, Arizona (USA), the Fire Department cardiac arrest database has revealed a number of resuscitation issues. These include a poor bystander CPR rate, a lack of response to initial defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation, and substantial time without chest compressions during the resuscitation effort. A local change in our previous resuscitation protocols had been instituted based upon this historical database information.

AB - Stagnant survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain a great impetus for advancing resuscitation science. International resuscitation guidelines, with all their advantages for standardizing resuscitation therapeutic protocols, can be difficult to change. A formalized evidence-based process has been adopted by the International Liason Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in formulating such guidelines. Currently, randomized clinical trials are considered optimal evidence, and very few major changes in the Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care are made without such. An alternative approach is to allow externally controlled clinical trials more weight in Guideline formulation and resuscitation protocol adoption. In Tucson, Arizona (USA), the Fire Department cardiac arrest database has revealed a number of resuscitation issues. These include a poor bystander CPR rate, a lack of response to initial defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation, and substantial time without chest compressions during the resuscitation effort. A local change in our previous resuscitation protocols had been instituted based upon this historical database information.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Chest compressions

KW - Defibrillation

KW - Guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14544268113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14544268113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.08.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 15733752

AN - SCOPUS:14544268113

VL - 64

SP - 261

EP - 268

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 3

ER -