An anthropological genetic perspective on creolization in the anglophone caribbean

Jada Benn Torres, Anne C. Stone, Rick A Kittles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Variable socio-cultural influences developed in the colonial Caribbean as a result of competing European hegemonic rule. In this study, we examine how colonial regulations regarding social hierarchies and mate choice worked to influence the genetic landscape of contemporary African Caribbean populations. To this end, 420 individuals from Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, St. Thomas, St. Vincent, Jamaica, and Trinidad were genotyped for 105 autosomal ancestry informative markers. Based on these data, population substructure and admixture were assessed using an exact test, a model-based clustering method, and principal components analysis. On average, individual admixture estimates of the pooled African Caribbean sample were 77% (SD ± 18%) West African, 15% (SD ± 15%) European, and 7.7% (SD ± 8%) Native American. In general, ancestry estimates were significantly different between Dominica and all other islands. Genetic structure analyses indicated subdivision into two subpopulations on most islands. Finally, unlike all of the other Caribbean populations that clustered adjacent to African populations, the Dominican population was more intermediate between the three parental groups in the principal components plot. As a result of the significant French influence throughout Dominican history, Dominica did not have the same cultural influences that typified other Anglophone colonies. Consequently, there were different social hierarchies and resulting mate choices on Dominica compared with the other considered islands. This study highlights the complex socio-cultural history of a broad region of the Caribbean and attests to the interplay between social and biological factors in shaping the genetic diversity present in present-day communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-143
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume151
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dominica
Anthropology
Caribbean Region
Social Hierarchy
Islands
Population
Saint Lucia
Grenada
History
Trinidad and Tobago
Jamaica
biological factors
North American Indians
cultural history
Genetic Structures
present
Biological Factors
Principal Component Analysis
social factors
Cluster Analysis

Keywords

  • admixture
  • ancestry informative markers
  • Dominica
  • population structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Anatomy

Cite this

An anthropological genetic perspective on creolization in the anglophone caribbean. / Torres, Jada Benn; Stone, Anne C.; Kittles, Rick A.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 151, No. 1, 05.2013, p. 135-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd7bcc6e2752414cb0b0ff3eefae57f2,
title = "An anthropological genetic perspective on creolization in the anglophone caribbean",
abstract = "Variable socio-cultural influences developed in the colonial Caribbean as a result of competing European hegemonic rule. In this study, we examine how colonial regulations regarding social hierarchies and mate choice worked to influence the genetic landscape of contemporary African Caribbean populations. To this end, 420 individuals from Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, St. Thomas, St. Vincent, Jamaica, and Trinidad were genotyped for 105 autosomal ancestry informative markers. Based on these data, population substructure and admixture were assessed using an exact test, a model-based clustering method, and principal components analysis. On average, individual admixture estimates of the pooled African Caribbean sample were 77{\%} (SD ± 18{\%}) West African, 15{\%} (SD ± 15{\%}) European, and 7.7{\%} (SD ± 8{\%}) Native American. In general, ancestry estimates were significantly different between Dominica and all other islands. Genetic structure analyses indicated subdivision into two subpopulations on most islands. Finally, unlike all of the other Caribbean populations that clustered adjacent to African populations, the Dominican population was more intermediate between the three parental groups in the principal components plot. As a result of the significant French influence throughout Dominican history, Dominica did not have the same cultural influences that typified other Anglophone colonies. Consequently, there were different social hierarchies and resulting mate choices on Dominica compared with the other considered islands. This study highlights the complex socio-cultural history of a broad region of the Caribbean and attests to the interplay between social and biological factors in shaping the genetic diversity present in present-day communities.",
keywords = "admixture, ancestry informative markers, Dominica, population structure",
author = "Torres, {Jada Benn} and Stone, {Anne C.} and Kittles, {Rick A}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.22261",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "135--143",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An anthropological genetic perspective on creolization in the anglophone caribbean

AU - Torres, Jada Benn

AU - Stone, Anne C.

AU - Kittles, Rick A

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Variable socio-cultural influences developed in the colonial Caribbean as a result of competing European hegemonic rule. In this study, we examine how colonial regulations regarding social hierarchies and mate choice worked to influence the genetic landscape of contemporary African Caribbean populations. To this end, 420 individuals from Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, St. Thomas, St. Vincent, Jamaica, and Trinidad were genotyped for 105 autosomal ancestry informative markers. Based on these data, population substructure and admixture were assessed using an exact test, a model-based clustering method, and principal components analysis. On average, individual admixture estimates of the pooled African Caribbean sample were 77% (SD ± 18%) West African, 15% (SD ± 15%) European, and 7.7% (SD ± 8%) Native American. In general, ancestry estimates were significantly different between Dominica and all other islands. Genetic structure analyses indicated subdivision into two subpopulations on most islands. Finally, unlike all of the other Caribbean populations that clustered adjacent to African populations, the Dominican population was more intermediate between the three parental groups in the principal components plot. As a result of the significant French influence throughout Dominican history, Dominica did not have the same cultural influences that typified other Anglophone colonies. Consequently, there were different social hierarchies and resulting mate choices on Dominica compared with the other considered islands. This study highlights the complex socio-cultural history of a broad region of the Caribbean and attests to the interplay between social and biological factors in shaping the genetic diversity present in present-day communities.

AB - Variable socio-cultural influences developed in the colonial Caribbean as a result of competing European hegemonic rule. In this study, we examine how colonial regulations regarding social hierarchies and mate choice worked to influence the genetic landscape of contemporary African Caribbean populations. To this end, 420 individuals from Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, St. Thomas, St. Vincent, Jamaica, and Trinidad were genotyped for 105 autosomal ancestry informative markers. Based on these data, population substructure and admixture were assessed using an exact test, a model-based clustering method, and principal components analysis. On average, individual admixture estimates of the pooled African Caribbean sample were 77% (SD ± 18%) West African, 15% (SD ± 15%) European, and 7.7% (SD ± 8%) Native American. In general, ancestry estimates were significantly different between Dominica and all other islands. Genetic structure analyses indicated subdivision into two subpopulations on most islands. Finally, unlike all of the other Caribbean populations that clustered adjacent to African populations, the Dominican population was more intermediate between the three parental groups in the principal components plot. As a result of the significant French influence throughout Dominican history, Dominica did not have the same cultural influences that typified other Anglophone colonies. Consequently, there were different social hierarchies and resulting mate choices on Dominica compared with the other considered islands. This study highlights the complex socio-cultural history of a broad region of the Caribbean and attests to the interplay between social and biological factors in shaping the genetic diversity present in present-day communities.

KW - admixture

KW - ancestry informative markers

KW - Dominica

KW - population structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876491228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876491228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.22261

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.22261

M3 - Article

C2 - 23553646

AN - SCOPUS:84876491228

VL - 151

SP - 135

EP - 143

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 1

ER -