An Empirical Analysis of State and Local Public Pension Plan Funded Ratio Change, 2001-2009

Qiushi Wang, Jun Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Between 2001 and 2009, all public pension plans suffered losses and saw a drop in their funded ratios. However, some plans saw a much smaller decline than others. In this study, we explore why the ratios fared so differently during this tumultuous period for pension plans. By examining the changes in funded ratio for 84 large public pension plans, we find that the differences can be mostly attributed to variations in annualized investment return and changes in investment return assumption, and to a lesser extent, to the required contributions paid by employers, the contribution rates of employees, and cost-of-living adjustment provisions. The results suggest that pension plans seeking to improve their funded ratios may need to revise their investment strategies, pay a higher percentage of their required contribution, require employees to pay more toward their pension benefit, and limit the use of automatic or consumer price index–linked cost-of-living adjustments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-91
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

local public
pension
cost of living
social security contributions
consumer price
employer
employee
Public pensions
Pension plans
Empirical analysis
Employees
Cost of living

Keywords

  • annual required contribution
  • COLA
  • funded ratio
  • investment return
  • public pension plan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

An Empirical Analysis of State and Local Public Pension Plan Funded Ratio Change, 2001-2009. / Wang, Qiushi; Peng, Jun.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 75-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4843591ebd584d0095cd88c63099931c,
title = "An Empirical Analysis of State and Local Public Pension Plan Funded Ratio Change, 2001-2009",
abstract = "Between 2001 and 2009, all public pension plans suffered losses and saw a drop in their funded ratios. However, some plans saw a much smaller decline than others. In this study, we explore why the ratios fared so differently during this tumultuous period for pension plans. By examining the changes in funded ratio for 84 large public pension plans, we find that the differences can be mostly attributed to variations in annualized investment return and changes in investment return assumption, and to a lesser extent, to the required contributions paid by employers, the contribution rates of employees, and cost-of-living adjustment provisions. The results suggest that pension plans seeking to improve their funded ratios may need to revise their investment strategies, pay a higher percentage of their required contribution, require employees to pay more toward their pension benefit, and limit the use of automatic or consumer price index–linked cost-of-living adjustments.",
keywords = "annual required contribution, COLA, funded ratio, investment return, public pension plan",
author = "Qiushi Wang and Jun Peng",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0275074014533721",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "75--91",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Empirical Analysis of State and Local Public Pension Plan Funded Ratio Change, 2001-2009

AU - Wang, Qiushi

AU - Peng, Jun

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Between 2001 and 2009, all public pension plans suffered losses and saw a drop in their funded ratios. However, some plans saw a much smaller decline than others. In this study, we explore why the ratios fared so differently during this tumultuous period for pension plans. By examining the changes in funded ratio for 84 large public pension plans, we find that the differences can be mostly attributed to variations in annualized investment return and changes in investment return assumption, and to a lesser extent, to the required contributions paid by employers, the contribution rates of employees, and cost-of-living adjustment provisions. The results suggest that pension plans seeking to improve their funded ratios may need to revise their investment strategies, pay a higher percentage of their required contribution, require employees to pay more toward their pension benefit, and limit the use of automatic or consumer price index–linked cost-of-living adjustments.

AB - Between 2001 and 2009, all public pension plans suffered losses and saw a drop in their funded ratios. However, some plans saw a much smaller decline than others. In this study, we explore why the ratios fared so differently during this tumultuous period for pension plans. By examining the changes in funded ratio for 84 large public pension plans, we find that the differences can be mostly attributed to variations in annualized investment return and changes in investment return assumption, and to a lesser extent, to the required contributions paid by employers, the contribution rates of employees, and cost-of-living adjustment provisions. The results suggest that pension plans seeking to improve their funded ratios may need to revise their investment strategies, pay a higher percentage of their required contribution, require employees to pay more toward their pension benefit, and limit the use of automatic or consumer price index–linked cost-of-living adjustments.

KW - annual required contribution

KW - COLA

KW - funded ratio

KW - investment return

KW - public pension plan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948737756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948737756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074014533721

DO - 10.1177/0275074014533721

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84948737756

VL - 46

SP - 75

EP - 91

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 1

ER -