An evaluation of Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program

Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez, George B Ruyle, Susan Jorstad McClaran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program with the use of focus groups and a self-administered mail survey of grazing permittees and natural resource agency employees. Our primary objectives were to 1) determine whether Extension is reaching its target audience, 2) describe the monitoring practices and attitudes of permittees and agency staff, 3) determine whether there is a relationship between permittees' exposure to Cooperative Extension and their monitoring and management practices, and 4) identify the monitoring information needs and preferences of permittees and natural resource agency staff. We found that Arizona's rangeland monitoring Extension program has been effective in reaching a large part of its target audience, and a significant proportion of Arizona permittees monitor on public, private, and state-owned rangelands. However, overall monitoring adoption rates remain low. Extension contact is associated with use of monitoring and other beneficial management practices, and permittees and agency employees report that monitoring increased their knowledge and led to changes in management. Monitoring by permittees improves agency-permittee relationships in many cases. Most permittees and agency employees believe that their respective peers are the most reliable source of monitoring information and prefer to receive information from Extension through face-to-face contact at workshops or personalized on-site assistance. The evaluation revealed important social dimensions of rangeland monitoring. Extension agents play a key role in facilitating the social process of monitoring, as well as providing technical training in monitoring skills. Further study is needed to investigate whether permittee monitoring actually leads to better management, improved economic returns, or increased tenure security.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-98
Number of pages10
JournalRangeland Ecology and Management
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

rangeland
rangelands
cooperatives
monitoring
human resources
programme
evaluation
natural resources
management practice
natural resource
process monitoring
extension agents
extension programs
focus groups
peers
grazing

Keywords

  • Cooperative Extension
  • Focus group
  • Permittee-agency relations
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

An evaluation of Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program. / Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.; Ruyle, George B; McClaran, Susan Jorstad.

In: Rangeland Ecology and Management, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 89-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E. ; Ruyle, George B ; McClaran, Susan Jorstad. / An evaluation of Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program. In: Rangeland Ecology and Management. 2005 ; Vol. 58, No. 1. pp. 89-98.
@article{74d6df1dcc39466bae59affd84825038,
title = "An evaluation of Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program",
abstract = "We evaluated Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program with the use of focus groups and a self-administered mail survey of grazing permittees and natural resource agency employees. Our primary objectives were to 1) determine whether Extension is reaching its target audience, 2) describe the monitoring practices and attitudes of permittees and agency staff, 3) determine whether there is a relationship between permittees' exposure to Cooperative Extension and their monitoring and management practices, and 4) identify the monitoring information needs and preferences of permittees and natural resource agency staff. We found that Arizona's rangeland monitoring Extension program has been effective in reaching a large part of its target audience, and a significant proportion of Arizona permittees monitor on public, private, and state-owned rangelands. However, overall monitoring adoption rates remain low. Extension contact is associated with use of monitoring and other beneficial management practices, and permittees and agency employees report that monitoring increased their knowledge and led to changes in management. Monitoring by permittees improves agency-permittee relationships in many cases. Most permittees and agency employees believe that their respective peers are the most reliable source of monitoring information and prefer to receive information from Extension through face-to-face contact at workshops or personalized on-site assistance. The evaluation revealed important social dimensions of rangeland monitoring. Extension agents play a key role in facilitating the social process of monitoring, as well as providing technical training in monitoring skills. Further study is needed to investigate whether permittee monitoring actually leads to better management, improved economic returns, or increased tenure security.",
keywords = "Cooperative Extension, Focus group, Permittee-agency relations, Survey",
author = "Fernandez-Gimenez, {Maria E.} and Ruyle, {George B} and McClaran, {Susan Jorstad}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58<89:AEOACE>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "89--98",
journal = "Rangeland Ecology and Management",
issn = "1550-7424",
publisher = "Society for Range Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program

AU - Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.

AU - Ruyle, George B

AU - McClaran, Susan Jorstad

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - We evaluated Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program with the use of focus groups and a self-administered mail survey of grazing permittees and natural resource agency employees. Our primary objectives were to 1) determine whether Extension is reaching its target audience, 2) describe the monitoring practices and attitudes of permittees and agency staff, 3) determine whether there is a relationship between permittees' exposure to Cooperative Extension and their monitoring and management practices, and 4) identify the monitoring information needs and preferences of permittees and natural resource agency staff. We found that Arizona's rangeland monitoring Extension program has been effective in reaching a large part of its target audience, and a significant proportion of Arizona permittees monitor on public, private, and state-owned rangelands. However, overall monitoring adoption rates remain low. Extension contact is associated with use of monitoring and other beneficial management practices, and permittees and agency employees report that monitoring increased their knowledge and led to changes in management. Monitoring by permittees improves agency-permittee relationships in many cases. Most permittees and agency employees believe that their respective peers are the most reliable source of monitoring information and prefer to receive information from Extension through face-to-face contact at workshops or personalized on-site assistance. The evaluation revealed important social dimensions of rangeland monitoring. Extension agents play a key role in facilitating the social process of monitoring, as well as providing technical training in monitoring skills. Further study is needed to investigate whether permittee monitoring actually leads to better management, improved economic returns, or increased tenure security.

AB - We evaluated Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program with the use of focus groups and a self-administered mail survey of grazing permittees and natural resource agency employees. Our primary objectives were to 1) determine whether Extension is reaching its target audience, 2) describe the monitoring practices and attitudes of permittees and agency staff, 3) determine whether there is a relationship between permittees' exposure to Cooperative Extension and their monitoring and management practices, and 4) identify the monitoring information needs and preferences of permittees and natural resource agency staff. We found that Arizona's rangeland monitoring Extension program has been effective in reaching a large part of its target audience, and a significant proportion of Arizona permittees monitor on public, private, and state-owned rangelands. However, overall monitoring adoption rates remain low. Extension contact is associated with use of monitoring and other beneficial management practices, and permittees and agency employees report that monitoring increased their knowledge and led to changes in management. Monitoring by permittees improves agency-permittee relationships in many cases. Most permittees and agency employees believe that their respective peers are the most reliable source of monitoring information and prefer to receive information from Extension through face-to-face contact at workshops or personalized on-site assistance. The evaluation revealed important social dimensions of rangeland monitoring. Extension agents play a key role in facilitating the social process of monitoring, as well as providing technical training in monitoring skills. Further study is needed to investigate whether permittee monitoring actually leads to better management, improved economic returns, or increased tenure security.

KW - Cooperative Extension

KW - Focus group

KW - Permittee-agency relations

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22744439892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22744439892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58<89:AEOACE>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58<89:AEOACE>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:22744439892

VL - 58

SP - 89

EP - 98

JO - Rangeland Ecology and Management

JF - Rangeland Ecology and Management

SN - 1550-7424

IS - 1

ER -