An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams

Terrance M. Scott, Julianna McIntyre, Carl J Liaupsin, C. Michael Nelson, Maureen Conroy, Linda Donica Payne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although functional behavior assessment (FBA) is widely advocated as best practice in developing effective behavior intervention plans for students with challenging behaviors, there is no compelling evidence supporting the ability of school-based personnel to use the outcomes of FBA to develop effective interventions. In this study, selected staff members from four elementary schools were trained in how to use the outcomes of an FBA to develop function-based intervention plans. They then formed school-based intervention teams and served as facilitators for a total of 31 cases. The same cases also were distributed to three national FBA experts who selected interventions based on the identified function for each case. The number and type of selected intervention strategies were recorded and analyzed across cases. Comparisons between team and expert intervention strategy selection revealed that school-based personnel in this study were more likely to select punitive and exclusionary strategies, regardless of function. Thus, in real-world school settings, the link between FBA and intervention is far more complex than has been recognized or discussed in the literature. Discussion focuses on possible explanations for the finding that school-based teams tend to gravitate toward more negative and exclusionary strategies, even when mediated by a trained FBA facilitator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-215
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions
Volume7
Issue number4
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. / Scott, Terrance M.; McIntyre, Julianna; Liaupsin, Carl J; Nelson, C. Michael; Conroy, Maureen; Payne, Linda Donica.

In: Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, Vol. 7, No. 4, 09.2005, p. 205-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, Terrance M. ; McIntyre, Julianna ; Liaupsin, Carl J ; Nelson, C. Michael ; Conroy, Maureen ; Payne, Linda Donica. / An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. In: Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 205-215.
@article{c274858e8a874f519bf41d87a7f7c7f3,
title = "An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams",
abstract = "Although functional behavior assessment (FBA) is widely advocated as best practice in developing effective behavior intervention plans for students with challenging behaviors, there is no compelling evidence supporting the ability of school-based personnel to use the outcomes of FBA to develop effective interventions. In this study, selected staff members from four elementary schools were trained in how to use the outcomes of an FBA to develop function-based intervention plans. They then formed school-based intervention teams and served as facilitators for a total of 31 cases. The same cases also were distributed to three national FBA experts who selected interventions based on the identified function for each case. The number and type of selected intervention strategies were recorded and analyzed across cases. Comparisons between team and expert intervention strategy selection revealed that school-based personnel in this study were more likely to select punitive and exclusionary strategies, regardless of function. Thus, in real-world school settings, the link between FBA and intervention is far more complex than has been recognized or discussed in the literature. Discussion focuses on possible explanations for the finding that school-based teams tend to gravitate toward more negative and exclusionary strategies, even when mediated by a trained FBA facilitator.",
author = "Scott, {Terrance M.} and Julianna McIntyre and Liaupsin, {Carl J} and Nelson, {C. Michael} and Maureen Conroy and Payne, {Linda Donica}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "205--215",
journal = "Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions",
issn = "1098-3007",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams

AU - Scott, Terrance M.

AU - McIntyre, Julianna

AU - Liaupsin, Carl J

AU - Nelson, C. Michael

AU - Conroy, Maureen

AU - Payne, Linda Donica

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Although functional behavior assessment (FBA) is widely advocated as best practice in developing effective behavior intervention plans for students with challenging behaviors, there is no compelling evidence supporting the ability of school-based personnel to use the outcomes of FBA to develop effective interventions. In this study, selected staff members from four elementary schools were trained in how to use the outcomes of an FBA to develop function-based intervention plans. They then formed school-based intervention teams and served as facilitators for a total of 31 cases. The same cases also were distributed to three national FBA experts who selected interventions based on the identified function for each case. The number and type of selected intervention strategies were recorded and analyzed across cases. Comparisons between team and expert intervention strategy selection revealed that school-based personnel in this study were more likely to select punitive and exclusionary strategies, regardless of function. Thus, in real-world school settings, the link between FBA and intervention is far more complex than has been recognized or discussed in the literature. Discussion focuses on possible explanations for the finding that school-based teams tend to gravitate toward more negative and exclusionary strategies, even when mediated by a trained FBA facilitator.

AB - Although functional behavior assessment (FBA) is widely advocated as best practice in developing effective behavior intervention plans for students with challenging behaviors, there is no compelling evidence supporting the ability of school-based personnel to use the outcomes of FBA to develop effective interventions. In this study, selected staff members from four elementary schools were trained in how to use the outcomes of an FBA to develop function-based intervention plans. They then formed school-based intervention teams and served as facilitators for a total of 31 cases. The same cases also were distributed to three national FBA experts who selected interventions based on the identified function for each case. The number and type of selected intervention strategies were recorded and analyzed across cases. Comparisons between team and expert intervention strategy selection revealed that school-based personnel in this study were more likely to select punitive and exclusionary strategies, regardless of function. Thus, in real-world school settings, the link between FBA and intervention is far more complex than has been recognized or discussed in the literature. Discussion focuses on possible explanations for the finding that school-based teams tend to gravitate toward more negative and exclusionary strategies, even when mediated by a trained FBA facilitator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28844481456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28844481456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 205

EP - 215

JO - Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions

JF - Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions

SN - 1098-3007

IS - 4

ER -