An examination of visual comfort in transitional spaces

Mohamad T. Araji, Mohamed Boubekri, Nader V Chalfoun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the issue of visual comfort at building entrances as the user moves from darker interior spaces to the brighter exterior. The effects on visual comfort of several design features such as overhead trellises, solid overhangs, vertical fins, and solid sidewalls were assessed. These features were tested individually and in various combinations. Visual comfort was expressed in terms of the luminance ratios at equidistant station points along the user's path in the transition entry zone. Discomfort sensations resulting from the difference in luminance ratios according to various design combinations ranged from "dramatic" (high visual discomfort or shock) to "subtle" (little visual discomfort). It was found that several design features significantly affect visual comfort. In particular, a deep canopy with combined transmittance characteristics (partially and entirely blocking daylight penetration) extending over the entrance of the building leads to the greatest visual comfort, but a simple 4.8m overhang was also found to be adequate, leading to reasonable visual comfort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-356
Number of pages8
JournalArchitectural Science Review
Volume50
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Luminance

Keywords

  • Daylighting
  • Entrances
  • Transitional spaces
  • Visual comfort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction

Cite this

An examination of visual comfort in transitional spaces. / Araji, Mohamad T.; Boubekri, Mohamed; Chalfoun, Nader V.

In: Architectural Science Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, 12.2007, p. 349-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Araji, Mohamad T. ; Boubekri, Mohamed ; Chalfoun, Nader V. / An examination of visual comfort in transitional spaces. In: Architectural Science Review. 2007 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 349-356.
@article{8f336ba0485d4338b9e179e497ffb7b0,
title = "An examination of visual comfort in transitional spaces",
abstract = "This study investigated the issue of visual comfort at building entrances as the user moves from darker interior spaces to the brighter exterior. The effects on visual comfort of several design features such as overhead trellises, solid overhangs, vertical fins, and solid sidewalls were assessed. These features were tested individually and in various combinations. Visual comfort was expressed in terms of the luminance ratios at equidistant station points along the user's path in the transition entry zone. Discomfort sensations resulting from the difference in luminance ratios according to various design combinations ranged from {"}dramatic{"} (high visual discomfort or shock) to {"}subtle{"} (little visual discomfort). It was found that several design features significantly affect visual comfort. In particular, a deep canopy with combined transmittance characteristics (partially and entirely blocking daylight penetration) extending over the entrance of the building leads to the greatest visual comfort, but a simple 4.8m overhang was also found to be adequate, leading to reasonable visual comfort.",
keywords = "Daylighting, Entrances, Transitional spaces, Visual comfort",
author = "Araji, {Mohamad T.} and Mohamed Boubekri and Chalfoun, {Nader V}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "349--356",
journal = "Architectural Science Review",
issn = "0003-8628",
publisher = "Earthscan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of visual comfort in transitional spaces

AU - Araji, Mohamad T.

AU - Boubekri, Mohamed

AU - Chalfoun, Nader V

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - This study investigated the issue of visual comfort at building entrances as the user moves from darker interior spaces to the brighter exterior. The effects on visual comfort of several design features such as overhead trellises, solid overhangs, vertical fins, and solid sidewalls were assessed. These features were tested individually and in various combinations. Visual comfort was expressed in terms of the luminance ratios at equidistant station points along the user's path in the transition entry zone. Discomfort sensations resulting from the difference in luminance ratios according to various design combinations ranged from "dramatic" (high visual discomfort or shock) to "subtle" (little visual discomfort). It was found that several design features significantly affect visual comfort. In particular, a deep canopy with combined transmittance characteristics (partially and entirely blocking daylight penetration) extending over the entrance of the building leads to the greatest visual comfort, but a simple 4.8m overhang was also found to be adequate, leading to reasonable visual comfort.

AB - This study investigated the issue of visual comfort at building entrances as the user moves from darker interior spaces to the brighter exterior. The effects on visual comfort of several design features such as overhead trellises, solid overhangs, vertical fins, and solid sidewalls were assessed. These features were tested individually and in various combinations. Visual comfort was expressed in terms of the luminance ratios at equidistant station points along the user's path in the transition entry zone. Discomfort sensations resulting from the difference in luminance ratios according to various design combinations ranged from "dramatic" (high visual discomfort or shock) to "subtle" (little visual discomfort). It was found that several design features significantly affect visual comfort. In particular, a deep canopy with combined transmittance characteristics (partially and entirely blocking daylight penetration) extending over the entrance of the building leads to the greatest visual comfort, but a simple 4.8m overhang was also found to be adequate, leading to reasonable visual comfort.

KW - Daylighting

KW - Entrances

KW - Transitional spaces

KW - Visual comfort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36849018621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36849018621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 349

EP - 356

JO - Architectural Science Review

JF - Architectural Science Review

SN - 0003-8628

IS - 4

ER -