An exploratory, population-based, mixed-methods program evaluation of user satisfaction of services provided by a regional extension center (REC)

Derek H. Tang, M. Rutala, C. Ihde, A. Bills, L. Mollon, Terri L Warholak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate user satisfaction among practices receiving services provided by the Arizona Regional Extension Center (REC). Methods: This program evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach including: 1) a mail-based survey targeting all 489 REC member practices; and 2) a series of telephone-based focus groups using a convenience sample of rural and urban REC member practices. Targeted respondents were key contacts who handle interactions with the REC at each practice. Program evaluators at the University of Arizona and experts at Arizona Health-e Connection (AzHeC) created the questionnaires, focus group script, participant invitation and follow up documents via a collaborative process. Regression and Rasch analyses were used to identify key factors associated with satisfaction with REC and to assess questionnaire validity, respectively. Results: Responses from both the focus groups and survey revealed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the current services, despite the presence of satisfaction gaps between practices of various characteristics: respondents that were clinicians, practices using web-based electronic health record systems (EHRs), and practices that had achieved Stage 1 Meaningful Use had a higher level of satisfaction compared with their respective counterparts. Focus group participants provided suggestions for improving REC services. Conclusions: Most respondents reported being satisfied with REC services. Specialized representatives may be needed for practices at different stages of Meaningful Use to further improve REC satisfaction in order to facilitate more efficient adoption of EHRs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Program Evaluation
Health
Focus Groups
Telephone
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires
Electronic Health Records
Postal Service
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Health information technology
  • Meaningful use
  • Mixed-methods study
  • Regional extension center
  • User satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

An exploratory, population-based, mixed-methods program evaluation of user satisfaction of services provided by a regional extension center (REC). / Tang, Derek H.; Rutala, M.; Ihde, C.; Bills, A.; Mollon, L.; Warholak, Terri L.

In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2014, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{472f50ed7caa428097b7347ce96d0dfd,
title = "An exploratory, population-based, mixed-methods program evaluation of user satisfaction of services provided by a regional extension center (REC)",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate user satisfaction among practices receiving services provided by the Arizona Regional Extension Center (REC). Methods: This program evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach including: 1) a mail-based survey targeting all 489 REC member practices; and 2) a series of telephone-based focus groups using a convenience sample of rural and urban REC member practices. Targeted respondents were key contacts who handle interactions with the REC at each practice. Program evaluators at the University of Arizona and experts at Arizona Health-e Connection (AzHeC) created the questionnaires, focus group script, participant invitation and follow up documents via a collaborative process. Regression and Rasch analyses were used to identify key factors associated with satisfaction with REC and to assess questionnaire validity, respectively. Results: Responses from both the focus groups and survey revealed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the current services, despite the presence of satisfaction gaps between practices of various characteristics: respondents that were clinicians, practices using web-based electronic health record systems (EHRs), and practices that had achieved Stage 1 Meaningful Use had a higher level of satisfaction compared with their respective counterparts. Focus group participants provided suggestions for improving REC services. Conclusions: Most respondents reported being satisfied with REC services. Specialized representatives may be needed for practices at different stages of Meaningful Use to further improve REC satisfaction in order to facilitate more efficient adoption of EHRs.",
keywords = "Health information technology, Meaningful use, Mixed-methods study, Regional extension center, User satisfaction",
author = "Tang, {Derek H.} and M. Rutala and C. Ihde and A. Bills and L. Mollon and Warholak, {Terri L}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4338/ACI-2013-06-RA-0037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
issn = "1869-0327",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An exploratory, population-based, mixed-methods program evaluation of user satisfaction of services provided by a regional extension center (REC)

AU - Tang, Derek H.

AU - Rutala, M.

AU - Ihde, C.

AU - Bills, A.

AU - Mollon, L.

AU - Warholak, Terri L

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate user satisfaction among practices receiving services provided by the Arizona Regional Extension Center (REC). Methods: This program evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach including: 1) a mail-based survey targeting all 489 REC member practices; and 2) a series of telephone-based focus groups using a convenience sample of rural and urban REC member practices. Targeted respondents were key contacts who handle interactions with the REC at each practice. Program evaluators at the University of Arizona and experts at Arizona Health-e Connection (AzHeC) created the questionnaires, focus group script, participant invitation and follow up documents via a collaborative process. Regression and Rasch analyses were used to identify key factors associated with satisfaction with REC and to assess questionnaire validity, respectively. Results: Responses from both the focus groups and survey revealed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the current services, despite the presence of satisfaction gaps between practices of various characteristics: respondents that were clinicians, practices using web-based electronic health record systems (EHRs), and practices that had achieved Stage 1 Meaningful Use had a higher level of satisfaction compared with their respective counterparts. Focus group participants provided suggestions for improving REC services. Conclusions: Most respondents reported being satisfied with REC services. Specialized representatives may be needed for practices at different stages of Meaningful Use to further improve REC satisfaction in order to facilitate more efficient adoption of EHRs.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate user satisfaction among practices receiving services provided by the Arizona Regional Extension Center (REC). Methods: This program evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach including: 1) a mail-based survey targeting all 489 REC member practices; and 2) a series of telephone-based focus groups using a convenience sample of rural and urban REC member practices. Targeted respondents were key contacts who handle interactions with the REC at each practice. Program evaluators at the University of Arizona and experts at Arizona Health-e Connection (AzHeC) created the questionnaires, focus group script, participant invitation and follow up documents via a collaborative process. Regression and Rasch analyses were used to identify key factors associated with satisfaction with REC and to assess questionnaire validity, respectively. Results: Responses from both the focus groups and survey revealed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the current services, despite the presence of satisfaction gaps between practices of various characteristics: respondents that were clinicians, practices using web-based electronic health record systems (EHRs), and practices that had achieved Stage 1 Meaningful Use had a higher level of satisfaction compared with their respective counterparts. Focus group participants provided suggestions for improving REC services. Conclusions: Most respondents reported being satisfied with REC services. Specialized representatives may be needed for practices at different stages of Meaningful Use to further improve REC satisfaction in order to facilitate more efficient adoption of EHRs.

KW - Health information technology

KW - Meaningful use

KW - Mixed-methods study

KW - Regional extension center

KW - User satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892184337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892184337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2013-06-RA-0037

DO - 10.4338/ACI-2013-06-RA-0037

M3 - Article

C2 - 24734121

AN - SCOPUS:84892184337

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

SN - 1869-0327

IS - 1

ER -