An illustrative overview of semi-quantitative MRI scoring of knee osteoarthritis: Lessons learned from longitudinal observational studies

F. W. Roemer, D. J. Hunter, M. D. Crema, Chian K Kwoh, E. Ochoa-Albiztegui, A. Guermazi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To introduce the most popular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteoarthritis (OA) semi-quantitative (SQ) scoring systems to a broader audience with a focus on the most commonly applied scores, i.e., the MOAKS and WORMS system and illustrate similarities and differences. Design: While the main structure and methodology of each scoring system are publicly available, the core of this overview will be an illustrative imaging atlas section including image examples from multiple OA studies applying MRI in regard to different features assessed, show specific examples of different grades and point out pitfalls and specifics of SQ assessment including artifacts, blinding to time point of acquisition and within-grade evaluation. Results: Similarities and differences between different scoring systems are presented. Technical considerations are followed by a brief description of the most commonly utilized SQ scoring systems including their responsiveness and reliability. The second part is comprised of the atlas section presenting illustrative image examples. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that SQ assessment of OA by expert MRI readers is valid, reliable and responsive, which helps investigators to understand the natural history of this complex disease and to evaluate potential new drugs in OA clinical trials. Researchers have to be aware of the differences and specifics of the different systems to be able to engage in imaging assessment and interpretation of imaging-based data. SQ scoring has enabled us to explain associations of structural tissue damage with clinical manifestations of the disease and with morphological alterations thought to represent disease progression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)274-289
Number of pages16
JournalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Knee Osteoarthritis
Magnetic resonance
Osteoarthritis
Observational Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging techniques
Atlases
Research Personnel
Artifacts
Disease Progression
Clinical Trials
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Tissue

Keywords

  • Imaging
  • MOAKS
  • MRI
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Semi-quantitative scoring
  • WORMS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rheumatology

Cite this

An illustrative overview of semi-quantitative MRI scoring of knee osteoarthritis : Lessons learned from longitudinal observational studies. / Roemer, F. W.; Hunter, D. J.; Crema, M. D.; Kwoh, Chian K; Ochoa-Albiztegui, E.; Guermazi, A.

In: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 274-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roemer, F. W. ; Hunter, D. J. ; Crema, M. D. ; Kwoh, Chian K ; Ochoa-Albiztegui, E. ; Guermazi, A. / An illustrative overview of semi-quantitative MRI scoring of knee osteoarthritis : Lessons learned from longitudinal observational studies. In: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 274-289.
@article{154a0de4ef774954b9b082c0fe4e830c,
title = "An illustrative overview of semi-quantitative MRI scoring of knee osteoarthritis: Lessons learned from longitudinal observational studies",
abstract = "Objective: To introduce the most popular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteoarthritis (OA) semi-quantitative (SQ) scoring systems to a broader audience with a focus on the most commonly applied scores, i.e., the MOAKS and WORMS system and illustrate similarities and differences. Design: While the main structure and methodology of each scoring system are publicly available, the core of this overview will be an illustrative imaging atlas section including image examples from multiple OA studies applying MRI in regard to different features assessed, show specific examples of different grades and point out pitfalls and specifics of SQ assessment including artifacts, blinding to time point of acquisition and within-grade evaluation. Results: Similarities and differences between different scoring systems are presented. Technical considerations are followed by a brief description of the most commonly utilized SQ scoring systems including their responsiveness and reliability. The second part is comprised of the atlas section presenting illustrative image examples. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that SQ assessment of OA by expert MRI readers is valid, reliable and responsive, which helps investigators to understand the natural history of this complex disease and to evaluate potential new drugs in OA clinical trials. Researchers have to be aware of the differences and specifics of the different systems to be able to engage in imaging assessment and interpretation of imaging-based data. SQ scoring has enabled us to explain associations of structural tissue damage with clinical manifestations of the disease and with morphological alterations thought to represent disease progression.",
keywords = "Imaging, MOAKS, MRI, Osteoarthritis, Semi-quantitative scoring, WORMS",
author = "Roemer, {F. W.} and Hunter, {D. J.} and Crema, {M. D.} and Kwoh, {Chian K} and E. Ochoa-Albiztegui and A. Guermazi",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joca.2015.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "274--289",
journal = "Osteoarthritis and Cartilage",
issn = "1063-4584",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An illustrative overview of semi-quantitative MRI scoring of knee osteoarthritis

T2 - Lessons learned from longitudinal observational studies

AU - Roemer, F. W.

AU - Hunter, D. J.

AU - Crema, M. D.

AU - Kwoh, Chian K

AU - Ochoa-Albiztegui, E.

AU - Guermazi, A.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Objective: To introduce the most popular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteoarthritis (OA) semi-quantitative (SQ) scoring systems to a broader audience with a focus on the most commonly applied scores, i.e., the MOAKS and WORMS system and illustrate similarities and differences. Design: While the main structure and methodology of each scoring system are publicly available, the core of this overview will be an illustrative imaging atlas section including image examples from multiple OA studies applying MRI in regard to different features assessed, show specific examples of different grades and point out pitfalls and specifics of SQ assessment including artifacts, blinding to time point of acquisition and within-grade evaluation. Results: Similarities and differences between different scoring systems are presented. Technical considerations are followed by a brief description of the most commonly utilized SQ scoring systems including their responsiveness and reliability. The second part is comprised of the atlas section presenting illustrative image examples. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that SQ assessment of OA by expert MRI readers is valid, reliable and responsive, which helps investigators to understand the natural history of this complex disease and to evaluate potential new drugs in OA clinical trials. Researchers have to be aware of the differences and specifics of the different systems to be able to engage in imaging assessment and interpretation of imaging-based data. SQ scoring has enabled us to explain associations of structural tissue damage with clinical manifestations of the disease and with morphological alterations thought to represent disease progression.

AB - Objective: To introduce the most popular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteoarthritis (OA) semi-quantitative (SQ) scoring systems to a broader audience with a focus on the most commonly applied scores, i.e., the MOAKS and WORMS system and illustrate similarities and differences. Design: While the main structure and methodology of each scoring system are publicly available, the core of this overview will be an illustrative imaging atlas section including image examples from multiple OA studies applying MRI in regard to different features assessed, show specific examples of different grades and point out pitfalls and specifics of SQ assessment including artifacts, blinding to time point of acquisition and within-grade evaluation. Results: Similarities and differences between different scoring systems are presented. Technical considerations are followed by a brief description of the most commonly utilized SQ scoring systems including their responsiveness and reliability. The second part is comprised of the atlas section presenting illustrative image examples. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that SQ assessment of OA by expert MRI readers is valid, reliable and responsive, which helps investigators to understand the natural history of this complex disease and to evaluate potential new drugs in OA clinical trials. Researchers have to be aware of the differences and specifics of the different systems to be able to engage in imaging assessment and interpretation of imaging-based data. SQ scoring has enabled us to explain associations of structural tissue damage with clinical manifestations of the disease and with morphological alterations thought to represent disease progression.

KW - Imaging

KW - MOAKS

KW - MRI

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - Semi-quantitative scoring

KW - WORMS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955673656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955673656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joca.2015.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.joca.2015.08.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 26318656

AN - SCOPUS:84955673656

VL - 24

SP - 274

EP - 289

JO - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

JF - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

SN - 1063-4584

IS - 2

ER -