An interlaboratory comparison of dosimetry for a multi-institutional radiobiological research project

Observations, problems, solutions and lessons learned

Thomas M. Seed, Shiyun Xiao, Nancy Manley, Janko Nikolich-Zugich, Jason Pugh, Marcel Van Den Brink, Yoko Hirabayashi, Koji Yasutomo, Atsushi Iwama, Shigeo Koyasu, Ivo Shterev, Gregory Sempowski, Francesca Macchiarini, Kei Nakachi, Keith C. Kunugi, Clifford G. Hammer, Lawrence A. Dewerd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: An interlaboratory comparison of radiation dosimetry was conducted to determine the accuracy of doses being used experimentally for animal exposures within a large multi-institutional research project. The background and approach to this effort are described and discussed in terms of basic findings, problems and solutions. Methods: Dosimetry tests were carried out utilizing optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters embedded midline into mouse carcasses and thermal luminescence dosimeters (TLD) embedded midline into acrylic phantoms. Results: The effort demonstrated that the majority (4/7) of the laboratories was able to deliver sufficiently accurate exposures having maximum dosing errors of ≤5%. Comparable rates of 'dosimetric compliance' were noted between OSL- and TLD-based tests. Data analysis showed a highly linear relationship between 'measured' and 'target' doses, with errors falling largely between 0 and 20%. Outliers were most notable for OSL-based tests, while multiple tests by 'non-compliant' laboratories using orthovoltage X-rays contributed heavily to the wide variation in dosing errors. Conclusions: For the dosimetrically non-compliant laboratories, the relatively high rates of dosing errors were problematic, potentially compromising the quality of ongoing radiobiological research. This dosimetry effort proved to be instructive in establishing rigorous reviews of basic dosimetry protocols ensuring that dosing errors were minimized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-70
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Biology
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Luminescence
Research
Hot Temperature
Radiometry
Compliance
X-Rays
Radiation Dosimeters

Keywords

  • animal models
  • dose-response curve
  • Dosimetry
  • haematology
  • ionizing
  • OSL/TLD dosimeters
  • radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

An interlaboratory comparison of dosimetry for a multi-institutional radiobiological research project : Observations, problems, solutions and lessons learned. / Seed, Thomas M.; Xiao, Shiyun; Manley, Nancy; Nikolich-Zugich, Janko; Pugh, Jason; Van Den Brink, Marcel; Hirabayashi, Yoko; Yasutomo, Koji; Iwama, Atsushi; Koyasu, Shigeo; Shterev, Ivo; Sempowski, Gregory; Macchiarini, Francesca; Nakachi, Kei; Kunugi, Keith C.; Hammer, Clifford G.; Dewerd, Lawrence A.

In: International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 92, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 59-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seed, TM, Xiao, S, Manley, N, Nikolich-Zugich, J, Pugh, J, Van Den Brink, M, Hirabayashi, Y, Yasutomo, K, Iwama, A, Koyasu, S, Shterev, I, Sempowski, G, Macchiarini, F, Nakachi, K, Kunugi, KC, Hammer, CG & Dewerd, LA 2016, 'An interlaboratory comparison of dosimetry for a multi-institutional radiobiological research project: Observations, problems, solutions and lessons learned', International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2015.1106024
Seed, Thomas M. ; Xiao, Shiyun ; Manley, Nancy ; Nikolich-Zugich, Janko ; Pugh, Jason ; Van Den Brink, Marcel ; Hirabayashi, Yoko ; Yasutomo, Koji ; Iwama, Atsushi ; Koyasu, Shigeo ; Shterev, Ivo ; Sempowski, Gregory ; Macchiarini, Francesca ; Nakachi, Kei ; Kunugi, Keith C. ; Hammer, Clifford G. ; Dewerd, Lawrence A. / An interlaboratory comparison of dosimetry for a multi-institutional radiobiological research project : Observations, problems, solutions and lessons learned. In: International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2016 ; Vol. 92, No. 2. pp. 59-70.
@article{2fe31f867a21475ba7f7aa5581b8efbd,
title = "An interlaboratory comparison of dosimetry for a multi-institutional radiobiological research project: Observations, problems, solutions and lessons learned",
abstract = "Purpose: An interlaboratory comparison of radiation dosimetry was conducted to determine the accuracy of doses being used experimentally for animal exposures within a large multi-institutional research project. The background and approach to this effort are described and discussed in terms of basic findings, problems and solutions. Methods: Dosimetry tests were carried out utilizing optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters embedded midline into mouse carcasses and thermal luminescence dosimeters (TLD) embedded midline into acrylic phantoms. Results: The effort demonstrated that the majority (4/7) of the laboratories was able to deliver sufficiently accurate exposures having maximum dosing errors of ≤5{\%}. Comparable rates of 'dosimetric compliance' were noted between OSL- and TLD-based tests. Data analysis showed a highly linear relationship between 'measured' and 'target' doses, with errors falling largely between 0 and 20{\%}. Outliers were most notable for OSL-based tests, while multiple tests by 'non-compliant' laboratories using orthovoltage X-rays contributed heavily to the wide variation in dosing errors. Conclusions: For the dosimetrically non-compliant laboratories, the relatively high rates of dosing errors were problematic, potentially compromising the quality of ongoing radiobiological research. This dosimetry effort proved to be instructive in establishing rigorous reviews of basic dosimetry protocols ensuring that dosing errors were minimized.",
keywords = "animal models, dose-response curve, Dosimetry, haematology, ionizing, OSL/TLD dosimeters, radiation",
author = "Seed, {Thomas M.} and Shiyun Xiao and Nancy Manley and Janko Nikolich-Zugich and Jason Pugh and {Van Den Brink}, Marcel and Yoko Hirabayashi and Koji Yasutomo and Atsushi Iwama and Shigeo Koyasu and Ivo Shterev and Gregory Sempowski and Francesca Macchiarini and Kei Nakachi and Kunugi, {Keith C.} and Hammer, {Clifford G.} and Dewerd, {Lawrence A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/09553002.2015.1106024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "59--70",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Biology",
issn = "0955-3002",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An interlaboratory comparison of dosimetry for a multi-institutional radiobiological research project

T2 - Observations, problems, solutions and lessons learned

AU - Seed, Thomas M.

AU - Xiao, Shiyun

AU - Manley, Nancy

AU - Nikolich-Zugich, Janko

AU - Pugh, Jason

AU - Van Den Brink, Marcel

AU - Hirabayashi, Yoko

AU - Yasutomo, Koji

AU - Iwama, Atsushi

AU - Koyasu, Shigeo

AU - Shterev, Ivo

AU - Sempowski, Gregory

AU - Macchiarini, Francesca

AU - Nakachi, Kei

AU - Kunugi, Keith C.

AU - Hammer, Clifford G.

AU - Dewerd, Lawrence A.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Purpose: An interlaboratory comparison of radiation dosimetry was conducted to determine the accuracy of doses being used experimentally for animal exposures within a large multi-institutional research project. The background and approach to this effort are described and discussed in terms of basic findings, problems and solutions. Methods: Dosimetry tests were carried out utilizing optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters embedded midline into mouse carcasses and thermal luminescence dosimeters (TLD) embedded midline into acrylic phantoms. Results: The effort demonstrated that the majority (4/7) of the laboratories was able to deliver sufficiently accurate exposures having maximum dosing errors of ≤5%. Comparable rates of 'dosimetric compliance' were noted between OSL- and TLD-based tests. Data analysis showed a highly linear relationship between 'measured' and 'target' doses, with errors falling largely between 0 and 20%. Outliers were most notable for OSL-based tests, while multiple tests by 'non-compliant' laboratories using orthovoltage X-rays contributed heavily to the wide variation in dosing errors. Conclusions: For the dosimetrically non-compliant laboratories, the relatively high rates of dosing errors were problematic, potentially compromising the quality of ongoing radiobiological research. This dosimetry effort proved to be instructive in establishing rigorous reviews of basic dosimetry protocols ensuring that dosing errors were minimized.

AB - Purpose: An interlaboratory comparison of radiation dosimetry was conducted to determine the accuracy of doses being used experimentally for animal exposures within a large multi-institutional research project. The background and approach to this effort are described and discussed in terms of basic findings, problems and solutions. Methods: Dosimetry tests were carried out utilizing optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters embedded midline into mouse carcasses and thermal luminescence dosimeters (TLD) embedded midline into acrylic phantoms. Results: The effort demonstrated that the majority (4/7) of the laboratories was able to deliver sufficiently accurate exposures having maximum dosing errors of ≤5%. Comparable rates of 'dosimetric compliance' were noted between OSL- and TLD-based tests. Data analysis showed a highly linear relationship between 'measured' and 'target' doses, with errors falling largely between 0 and 20%. Outliers were most notable for OSL-based tests, while multiple tests by 'non-compliant' laboratories using orthovoltage X-rays contributed heavily to the wide variation in dosing errors. Conclusions: For the dosimetrically non-compliant laboratories, the relatively high rates of dosing errors were problematic, potentially compromising the quality of ongoing radiobiological research. This dosimetry effort proved to be instructive in establishing rigorous reviews of basic dosimetry protocols ensuring that dosing errors were minimized.

KW - animal models

KW - dose-response curve

KW - Dosimetry

KW - haematology

KW - ionizing

KW - OSL/TLD dosimeters

KW - radiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958104634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958104634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/09553002.2015.1106024

DO - 10.3109/09553002.2015.1106024

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 59

EP - 70

JO - International Journal of Radiation Biology

JF - International Journal of Radiation Biology

SN - 0955-3002

IS - 2

ER -