Analysis and design of border irrigation systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Application efficiency (Ea) is the primary criterion for border irrigation design and management. The objective of this study is to analyze the behavior of the application efficiency function of border irrigation with respect to border length (L) and unit inlet flow rate (qo), given a target minimum application depth. The results show that the application efficiency function is unimodal with respect to L and qo. Optimality conditions are derived for both the Ea(L) and Ea(q o) functions, based on which simple rules that reduce the design and management procedure into a series of one-dimensional optimization problems with respect to qo are developed. The proposed procedure has a variable bounding step in which the feasible ranges of L and qo are determined. This is then followed by a step wherein alternative approximate optimum values of Ea(qo) are calculated for each of the feasible values of L. Finally, the optimal Ea(qo) is selected from the available alternatives based on sensitivity analysis and other locally pertinent practical criteria. In addition, the advantages and limitations of advance-phase and post-advance-phase inflow cutoff options and their effects on system design and management are discussed. The distance-based (advance-phase) inflow cutoff option offers two main advantages over post-advance-phase cutoff: operational convenience, and a lower degree of sensitivity of design and management prescriptions to inaccuracies in inflow measurements and to non-uniformities in the distribution of inlet flow over the width of the border. However, the results of the study also show that, depending on the parameter set, there exist limiting conditions that preclude the applicability of the distance-based cutoff criterion in border irrigation management. Even when the distance-based inflow cutoff criterion is feasible, the corresponding design and management scenario can be sub-optimal, in which case a near-optimum operation scenario can be realized only with post-advance-phase inflow cutoff.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1751-1764
Number of pages14
JournalTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers
Volume48
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

border irrigation
irrigation system
irrigation systems
Irrigation
inflow
Prescriptions
Inlet flow
irrigation
system optimization
irrigation management
Sensitivity analysis
sensitivity analysis
analysis
border
Systems analysis
Flow rate

Keywords

  • Border irrigation
  • Design
  • Management
  • Optimum application efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{cb7fd9a7867b4c84bb732efe8ceec2a5,
title = "Analysis and design of border irrigation systems",
abstract = "Application efficiency (Ea) is the primary criterion for border irrigation design and management. The objective of this study is to analyze the behavior of the application efficiency function of border irrigation with respect to border length (L) and unit inlet flow rate (qo), given a target minimum application depth. The results show that the application efficiency function is unimodal with respect to L and qo. Optimality conditions are derived for both the Ea(L) and Ea(q o) functions, based on which simple rules that reduce the design and management procedure into a series of one-dimensional optimization problems with respect to qo are developed. The proposed procedure has a variable bounding step in which the feasible ranges of L and qo are determined. This is then followed by a step wherein alternative approximate optimum values of Ea(qo) are calculated for each of the feasible values of L. Finally, the optimal Ea(qo) is selected from the available alternatives based on sensitivity analysis and other locally pertinent practical criteria. In addition, the advantages and limitations of advance-phase and post-advance-phase inflow cutoff options and their effects on system design and management are discussed. The distance-based (advance-phase) inflow cutoff option offers two main advantages over post-advance-phase cutoff: operational convenience, and a lower degree of sensitivity of design and management prescriptions to inaccuracies in inflow measurements and to non-uniformities in the distribution of inlet flow over the width of the border. However, the results of the study also show that, depending on the parameter set, there exist limiting conditions that preclude the applicability of the distance-based cutoff criterion in border irrigation management. Even when the distance-based inflow cutoff criterion is feasible, the corresponding design and management scenario can be sub-optimal, in which case a near-optimum operation scenario can be realized only with post-advance-phase inflow cutoff.",
keywords = "Border irrigation, Design, Management, Optimum application efficiency",
author = "D. Zerihun and Sanchez, {Charles A} and Farrell-Poe, {Kathryn L} and Muluneh Yitayew",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1751--1764",
journal = "Transactions of the ASABE",
issn = "2151-0032",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis and design of border irrigation systems

AU - Zerihun, D.

AU - Sanchez, Charles A

AU - Farrell-Poe, Kathryn L

AU - Yitayew, Muluneh

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Application efficiency (Ea) is the primary criterion for border irrigation design and management. The objective of this study is to analyze the behavior of the application efficiency function of border irrigation with respect to border length (L) and unit inlet flow rate (qo), given a target minimum application depth. The results show that the application efficiency function is unimodal with respect to L and qo. Optimality conditions are derived for both the Ea(L) and Ea(q o) functions, based on which simple rules that reduce the design and management procedure into a series of one-dimensional optimization problems with respect to qo are developed. The proposed procedure has a variable bounding step in which the feasible ranges of L and qo are determined. This is then followed by a step wherein alternative approximate optimum values of Ea(qo) are calculated for each of the feasible values of L. Finally, the optimal Ea(qo) is selected from the available alternatives based on sensitivity analysis and other locally pertinent practical criteria. In addition, the advantages and limitations of advance-phase and post-advance-phase inflow cutoff options and their effects on system design and management are discussed. The distance-based (advance-phase) inflow cutoff option offers two main advantages over post-advance-phase cutoff: operational convenience, and a lower degree of sensitivity of design and management prescriptions to inaccuracies in inflow measurements and to non-uniformities in the distribution of inlet flow over the width of the border. However, the results of the study also show that, depending on the parameter set, there exist limiting conditions that preclude the applicability of the distance-based cutoff criterion in border irrigation management. Even when the distance-based inflow cutoff criterion is feasible, the corresponding design and management scenario can be sub-optimal, in which case a near-optimum operation scenario can be realized only with post-advance-phase inflow cutoff.

AB - Application efficiency (Ea) is the primary criterion for border irrigation design and management. The objective of this study is to analyze the behavior of the application efficiency function of border irrigation with respect to border length (L) and unit inlet flow rate (qo), given a target minimum application depth. The results show that the application efficiency function is unimodal with respect to L and qo. Optimality conditions are derived for both the Ea(L) and Ea(q o) functions, based on which simple rules that reduce the design and management procedure into a series of one-dimensional optimization problems with respect to qo are developed. The proposed procedure has a variable bounding step in which the feasible ranges of L and qo are determined. This is then followed by a step wherein alternative approximate optimum values of Ea(qo) are calculated for each of the feasible values of L. Finally, the optimal Ea(qo) is selected from the available alternatives based on sensitivity analysis and other locally pertinent practical criteria. In addition, the advantages and limitations of advance-phase and post-advance-phase inflow cutoff options and their effects on system design and management are discussed. The distance-based (advance-phase) inflow cutoff option offers two main advantages over post-advance-phase cutoff: operational convenience, and a lower degree of sensitivity of design and management prescriptions to inaccuracies in inflow measurements and to non-uniformities in the distribution of inlet flow over the width of the border. However, the results of the study also show that, depending on the parameter set, there exist limiting conditions that preclude the applicability of the distance-based cutoff criterion in border irrigation management. Even when the distance-based inflow cutoff criterion is feasible, the corresponding design and management scenario can be sub-optimal, in which case a near-optimum operation scenario can be realized only with post-advance-phase inflow cutoff.

KW - Border irrigation

KW - Design

KW - Management

KW - Optimum application efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28944447416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28944447416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:28944447416

VL - 48

SP - 1751

EP - 1764

JO - Transactions of the ASABE

JF - Transactions of the ASABE

SN - 2151-0032

IS - 5

ER -