Another’s punishment cleanses the self

Evidence for a moral cleansing function of punishing transgressors

Zachary K. Rothschild, Mark J. Landau, Lucas A. Keefer, Daniel L Sullivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Separate lines of research show that individuals: (a) understand immorality metaphorically as physical contamination; (b) project undesirable self-attributes onto others; and (c) view punishment as eliminating a transgressor’s immorality. Integrating these findings, we hypothesized that individuals project guilt over their own immorality—represented as physical contamination—onto another transgressor whose punishment restores their own moral and physical purity. In Study 1, personal immorality salience decreased felt physical cleanliness unless another transgressor was punished. In Study 2, personal immorality salience led participants to see another transgressor as physically dirtier, an effect mediated by guilt. Furthermore, the punishment of the contaminated transgressor restored participants’ personal morality and eliminated restorative moral behavior. In Study 3, punishing a transgressor who served as a projection target for participants’ immorality removed felt physical contamination indirectly through decreased guilt. These studies are the first to show that another’s punishment can “cleanse” the self of “dirty” immorality feelings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)722-741
Number of pages20
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2015

Fingerprint

Punishment
Guilt
Emotions
Research

Keywords

  • Conceptual metaphor
  • Defensive projection
  • Morality
  • Punishment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Another’s punishment cleanses the self : Evidence for a moral cleansing function of punishing transgressors. / Rothschild, Zachary K.; Landau, Mark J.; Keefer, Lucas A.; Sullivan, Daniel L.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 39, No. 5, 15.10.2015, p. 722-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rothschild, Zachary K. ; Landau, Mark J. ; Keefer, Lucas A. ; Sullivan, Daniel L. / Another’s punishment cleanses the self : Evidence for a moral cleansing function of punishing transgressors. In: Motivation and Emotion. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 722-741.
@article{68d70d8f30fd4685b2a642c30d1e0a68,
title = "Another’s punishment cleanses the self: Evidence for a moral cleansing function of punishing transgressors",
abstract = "Separate lines of research show that individuals: (a) understand immorality metaphorically as physical contamination; (b) project undesirable self-attributes onto others; and (c) view punishment as eliminating a transgressor’s immorality. Integrating these findings, we hypothesized that individuals project guilt over their own immorality—represented as physical contamination—onto another transgressor whose punishment restores their own moral and physical purity. In Study 1, personal immorality salience decreased felt physical cleanliness unless another transgressor was punished. In Study 2, personal immorality salience led participants to see another transgressor as physically dirtier, an effect mediated by guilt. Furthermore, the punishment of the contaminated transgressor restored participants’ personal morality and eliminated restorative moral behavior. In Study 3, punishing a transgressor who served as a projection target for participants’ immorality removed felt physical contamination indirectly through decreased guilt. These studies are the first to show that another’s punishment can “cleanse” the self of “dirty” immorality feelings.",
keywords = "Conceptual metaphor, Defensive projection, Morality, Punishment",
author = "Rothschild, {Zachary K.} and Landau, {Mark J.} and Keefer, {Lucas A.} and Sullivan, {Daniel L}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-015-9487-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "722--741",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another’s punishment cleanses the self

T2 - Evidence for a moral cleansing function of punishing transgressors

AU - Rothschild, Zachary K.

AU - Landau, Mark J.

AU - Keefer, Lucas A.

AU - Sullivan, Daniel L

PY - 2015/10/15

Y1 - 2015/10/15

N2 - Separate lines of research show that individuals: (a) understand immorality metaphorically as physical contamination; (b) project undesirable self-attributes onto others; and (c) view punishment as eliminating a transgressor’s immorality. Integrating these findings, we hypothesized that individuals project guilt over their own immorality—represented as physical contamination—onto another transgressor whose punishment restores their own moral and physical purity. In Study 1, personal immorality salience decreased felt physical cleanliness unless another transgressor was punished. In Study 2, personal immorality salience led participants to see another transgressor as physically dirtier, an effect mediated by guilt. Furthermore, the punishment of the contaminated transgressor restored participants’ personal morality and eliminated restorative moral behavior. In Study 3, punishing a transgressor who served as a projection target for participants’ immorality removed felt physical contamination indirectly through decreased guilt. These studies are the first to show that another’s punishment can “cleanse” the self of “dirty” immorality feelings.

AB - Separate lines of research show that individuals: (a) understand immorality metaphorically as physical contamination; (b) project undesirable self-attributes onto others; and (c) view punishment as eliminating a transgressor’s immorality. Integrating these findings, we hypothesized that individuals project guilt over their own immorality—represented as physical contamination—onto another transgressor whose punishment restores their own moral and physical purity. In Study 1, personal immorality salience decreased felt physical cleanliness unless another transgressor was punished. In Study 2, personal immorality salience led participants to see another transgressor as physically dirtier, an effect mediated by guilt. Furthermore, the punishment of the contaminated transgressor restored participants’ personal morality and eliminated restorative moral behavior. In Study 3, punishing a transgressor who served as a projection target for participants’ immorality removed felt physical contamination indirectly through decreased guilt. These studies are the first to show that another’s punishment can “cleanse” the self of “dirty” immorality feelings.

KW - Conceptual metaphor

KW - Defensive projection

KW - Morality

KW - Punishment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941740285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941740285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-015-9487-9

DO - 10.1007/s11031-015-9487-9

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 722

EP - 741

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 5

ER -