Anterolateral thoracotomy as an alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve

Curtis G. Tribble, William A. Killinger, P. Kent Harman, Ivan K. Crosby, Stanton P. Nolan, Irving L. Kron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Median sternotomy is the most common approach for repeat cardiac surgery despite the potential complications of cardiac injury. Right anterolateral thoracotomy has been recommended as an alternative for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, but data supporting one approach over the other do not exist, To compare these procedures, the records of 43 patients who had had a previous median sternotomy and who underwent mitral valve replacement were reviewed. No statistically significant differences between patients undergoing repeat median sternotomy (33 patients) and those undergoing right anterolateral thoracotomy (10 patients) were demonstrable when compared for age, gender, New York Heart Association Functional Class, other diseased valves, urgency of operation, indication for operation, type of valve removed, type of valve implanted, length of post operative hospitalization, length of operation, days of ventilatory support, length of intensive care unit stay, and survival (90% for thoracotomy group; 76% for median sternotomy group; p, NS). Significant differences between the two groups, favoring right anterolateral thoracotomy, were apparent when comparisons were made for length of perfusion (means, 94.8 min, thoracotomy group; 121.4 min, sternotomy group; p = .03), incidence of reexploration (0%, thoracotomy group; 13%, sternotomy group; p = .001), and blood transfusion (means, 5.3 units, thoracotomy group; 11.4 units, sternotomy group; p = .003). Right anterolateral thoracotomy is an effective alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve in patients who have had a previous median sternotomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-256
Number of pages2
JournalThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume59
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sternotomy
Thoracotomy
Mitral Valve
Reoperation
Blood Transfusion
Thoracic Surgery
Intensive Care Units
Hospitalization
Perfusion
Survival
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Anterolateral thoracotomy as an alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve. / Tribble, Curtis G.; Killinger, William A.; Kent Harman, P.; Crosby, Ivan K.; Nolan, Stanton P.; Kron, Irving L.

In: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 59, No. 1, 01.1995, p. 255-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tribble, Curtis G. ; Killinger, William A. ; Kent Harman, P. ; Crosby, Ivan K. ; Nolan, Stanton P. ; Kron, Irving L. / Anterolateral thoracotomy as an alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve. In: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1995 ; Vol. 59, No. 1. pp. 255-256.
@article{4c3bd438d59f4526b65adfb2c226dd8f,
title = "Anterolateral thoracotomy as an alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve",
abstract = "Median sternotomy is the most common approach for repeat cardiac surgery despite the potential complications of cardiac injury. Right anterolateral thoracotomy has been recommended as an alternative for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, but data supporting one approach over the other do not exist, To compare these procedures, the records of 43 patients who had had a previous median sternotomy and who underwent mitral valve replacement were reviewed. No statistically significant differences between patients undergoing repeat median sternotomy (33 patients) and those undergoing right anterolateral thoracotomy (10 patients) were demonstrable when compared for age, gender, New York Heart Association Functional Class, other diseased valves, urgency of operation, indication for operation, type of valve removed, type of valve implanted, length of post operative hospitalization, length of operation, days of ventilatory support, length of intensive care unit stay, and survival (90{\%} for thoracotomy group; 76{\%} for median sternotomy group; p, NS). Significant differences between the two groups, favoring right anterolateral thoracotomy, were apparent when comparisons were made for length of perfusion (means, 94.8 min, thoracotomy group; 121.4 min, sternotomy group; p = .03), incidence of reexploration (0{\%}, thoracotomy group; 13{\%}, sternotomy group; p = .001), and blood transfusion (means, 5.3 units, thoracotomy group; 11.4 units, sternotomy group; p = .003). Right anterolateral thoracotomy is an effective alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve in patients who have had a previous median sternotomy.",
author = "Tribble, {Curtis G.} and Killinger, {William A.} and {Kent Harman}, P. and Crosby, {Ivan K.} and Nolan, {Stanton P.} and Kron, {Irving L.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0003-4975(94)00469-N",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "255--256",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anterolateral thoracotomy as an alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve

AU - Tribble, Curtis G.

AU - Killinger, William A.

AU - Kent Harman, P.

AU - Crosby, Ivan K.

AU - Nolan, Stanton P.

AU - Kron, Irving L.

PY - 1995/1

Y1 - 1995/1

N2 - Median sternotomy is the most common approach for repeat cardiac surgery despite the potential complications of cardiac injury. Right anterolateral thoracotomy has been recommended as an alternative for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, but data supporting one approach over the other do not exist, To compare these procedures, the records of 43 patients who had had a previous median sternotomy and who underwent mitral valve replacement were reviewed. No statistically significant differences between patients undergoing repeat median sternotomy (33 patients) and those undergoing right anterolateral thoracotomy (10 patients) were demonstrable when compared for age, gender, New York Heart Association Functional Class, other diseased valves, urgency of operation, indication for operation, type of valve removed, type of valve implanted, length of post operative hospitalization, length of operation, days of ventilatory support, length of intensive care unit stay, and survival (90% for thoracotomy group; 76% for median sternotomy group; p, NS). Significant differences between the two groups, favoring right anterolateral thoracotomy, were apparent when comparisons were made for length of perfusion (means, 94.8 min, thoracotomy group; 121.4 min, sternotomy group; p = .03), incidence of reexploration (0%, thoracotomy group; 13%, sternotomy group; p = .001), and blood transfusion (means, 5.3 units, thoracotomy group; 11.4 units, sternotomy group; p = .003). Right anterolateral thoracotomy is an effective alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve in patients who have had a previous median sternotomy.

AB - Median sternotomy is the most common approach for repeat cardiac surgery despite the potential complications of cardiac injury. Right anterolateral thoracotomy has been recommended as an alternative for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, but data supporting one approach over the other do not exist, To compare these procedures, the records of 43 patients who had had a previous median sternotomy and who underwent mitral valve replacement were reviewed. No statistically significant differences between patients undergoing repeat median sternotomy (33 patients) and those undergoing right anterolateral thoracotomy (10 patients) were demonstrable when compared for age, gender, New York Heart Association Functional Class, other diseased valves, urgency of operation, indication for operation, type of valve removed, type of valve implanted, length of post operative hospitalization, length of operation, days of ventilatory support, length of intensive care unit stay, and survival (90% for thoracotomy group; 76% for median sternotomy group; p, NS). Significant differences between the two groups, favoring right anterolateral thoracotomy, were apparent when comparisons were made for length of perfusion (means, 94.8 min, thoracotomy group; 121.4 min, sternotomy group; p = .03), incidence of reexploration (0%, thoracotomy group; 13%, sternotomy group; p = .001), and blood transfusion (means, 5.3 units, thoracotomy group; 11.4 units, sternotomy group; p = .003). Right anterolateral thoracotomy is an effective alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve in patients who have had a previous median sternotomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029196811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029196811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0003-4975(94)00469-N

DO - 10.1016/0003-4975(94)00469-N

M3 - Article

C2 - 7818344

AN - SCOPUS:0029196811

VL - 59

SP - 255

EP - 256

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 1

ER -