Apology for the abbe mallet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The abbé Edme Mallet was one of the main contributors to the first volumes of Diderot and D'Alembert's Encyclopédie, and the work's official theologian. Whereas his reputation, derived largely from D'Alembert's eulogy, was formerly that of a moderate open to dialogue with philosophers, in an article from the 1970s Walter E. Rex argued that Mallet was in fact a rigid defender of orthodoxy recruited for the Encyclopédie to offset its anti-religious tendencies. This article offers a refutation of Rex's influential theory, questioning his assumption of a fundamental opposition between Mallet and the other contributors. Beginning with the observation that Rex made his analysis of Mallet's religious articles without realizing that these are, in many instances, either wholly or partly translations from Chambers's Cyclopaedia, I move on to consider the censored article 'Constitution Unigenitus', where Mallet's opinion of the Jansenists is shown to be similar, rather than opposed, to that of Diderot and D'Alembert. In view of their statements in important sections of the Encyclopédie, I suggest that, contrary to common opinion, the editors' association with Mallet may reflect a sincere desire for collaboration with theologians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-172
Number of pages14
JournalFrench Studies
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

theologian
chamber
reputation
constitution
opposition
editor
dialogue
Religion
Denis Diderot
Theologians
Apology
Constitution
Questioning
Jansenists
1970s
Defenders
Refutation
Eulogy
Philosopher
Orthodoxy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Cultural Studies
  • History

Cite this

Apology for the abbe mallet. / Mcginnis, Reginald J.

In: French Studies, Vol. 69, No. 2, 01.04.2015, p. 159-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mcginnis, Reginald J. / Apology for the abbe mallet. In: French Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 159-172.
@article{e4bdcb7ebd3f4ceaac600ec34e1f0929,
title = "Apology for the abbe mallet",
abstract = "The abb{\'e} Edme Mallet was one of the main contributors to the first volumes of Diderot and D'Alembert's Encyclop{\'e}die, and the work's official theologian. Whereas his reputation, derived largely from D'Alembert's eulogy, was formerly that of a moderate open to dialogue with philosophers, in an article from the 1970s Walter E. Rex argued that Mallet was in fact a rigid defender of orthodoxy recruited for the Encyclop{\'e}die to offset its anti-religious tendencies. This article offers a refutation of Rex's influential theory, questioning his assumption of a fundamental opposition between Mallet and the other contributors. Beginning with the observation that Rex made his analysis of Mallet's religious articles without realizing that these are, in many instances, either wholly or partly translations from Chambers's Cyclopaedia, I move on to consider the censored article 'Constitution Unigenitus', where Mallet's opinion of the Jansenists is shown to be similar, rather than opposed, to that of Diderot and D'Alembert. In view of their statements in important sections of the Encyclop{\'e}die, I suggest that, contrary to common opinion, the editors' association with Mallet may reflect a sincere desire for collaboration with theologians.",
author = "Mcginnis, {Reginald J}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/fs/knu299",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "159--172",
journal = "French Studies",
issn = "0016-1128",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Apology for the abbe mallet

AU - Mcginnis, Reginald J

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - The abbé Edme Mallet was one of the main contributors to the first volumes of Diderot and D'Alembert's Encyclopédie, and the work's official theologian. Whereas his reputation, derived largely from D'Alembert's eulogy, was formerly that of a moderate open to dialogue with philosophers, in an article from the 1970s Walter E. Rex argued that Mallet was in fact a rigid defender of orthodoxy recruited for the Encyclopédie to offset its anti-religious tendencies. This article offers a refutation of Rex's influential theory, questioning his assumption of a fundamental opposition between Mallet and the other contributors. Beginning with the observation that Rex made his analysis of Mallet's religious articles without realizing that these are, in many instances, either wholly or partly translations from Chambers's Cyclopaedia, I move on to consider the censored article 'Constitution Unigenitus', where Mallet's opinion of the Jansenists is shown to be similar, rather than opposed, to that of Diderot and D'Alembert. In view of their statements in important sections of the Encyclopédie, I suggest that, contrary to common opinion, the editors' association with Mallet may reflect a sincere desire for collaboration with theologians.

AB - The abbé Edme Mallet was one of the main contributors to the first volumes of Diderot and D'Alembert's Encyclopédie, and the work's official theologian. Whereas his reputation, derived largely from D'Alembert's eulogy, was formerly that of a moderate open to dialogue with philosophers, in an article from the 1970s Walter E. Rex argued that Mallet was in fact a rigid defender of orthodoxy recruited for the Encyclopédie to offset its anti-religious tendencies. This article offers a refutation of Rex's influential theory, questioning his assumption of a fundamental opposition between Mallet and the other contributors. Beginning with the observation that Rex made his analysis of Mallet's religious articles without realizing that these are, in many instances, either wholly or partly translations from Chambers's Cyclopaedia, I move on to consider the censored article 'Constitution Unigenitus', where Mallet's opinion of the Jansenists is shown to be similar, rather than opposed, to that of Diderot and D'Alembert. In view of their statements in important sections of the Encyclopédie, I suggest that, contrary to common opinion, the editors' association with Mallet may reflect a sincere desire for collaboration with theologians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929927412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929927412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/fs/knu299

DO - 10.1093/fs/knu299

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 159

EP - 172

JO - French Studies

JF - French Studies

SN - 0016-1128

IS - 2

ER -