Application and Utility of iPads in Pediatric Tele-echocardiography

Jamie N. Colombo, Michael D. Seckeler, Brent J. Barber, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Ronald S Weinstein, David Sisk, Daniela Lax

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine is used with increasing frequency to improve patient care in remote areas. The interpretation of medical imaging on iPad® (Apple, Cupertino, CA) tablets has been reported to be accurate. There are no studies on the use of iPads for interpretation of pediatric echocardiograms. We compared the quality of echo images, diagnostic accuracy, and review time using three different modalities: remote access on an iPad Air (iPad), remote access via a computer (Remote), and direct access on a computer linked through Ethernet to the server, the "gold standard" (Direct). Materials and Methods: Fifty consecutive archived pediatric echocardiograms were interpreted using the three modalities. Studies were analyzed blindly by three pediatric cardiologists; review time, diagnostic accuracy, and image quality were documented. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the study diagnoses with the official diagnosis in the patient's chart. Discrepancies between diagnoses were graded as major (more than one grade difference) or minor (one grade difference in severity of lesion). Results: There were no significant differences in accuracy among the three modalities. There was one major discrepancy (size of patent ductus arteriosus); all others were minor, hemodynamically insignificant. Image quality ratings were better for iPad than Remote; Direct had the highest ratings. Review times (mean [standard deviation] minutes) were longest for iPad (5.89 [3.87]) and then Remote (4.72 [2.69]), with Direct having the shortest times (3.52 [1.42]) (p <0.0001). Conclusions: Pediatric echocardiograms can be interpreted using convenient, portable devices while preserving accuracy and quality with slightly longer review times (1-2 min). These findings are important in the current era of increasing need for mobile health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-433
Number of pages5
JournalTelemedicine Journal and e-Health
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Pediatrics
Telemedicine
Patent Ductus Arteriosus
Malus
Diagnostic Imaging
Tablets
Patient Care
Air
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • cardiology/cardiovascular disease
  • e-health
  • pediatrics
  • telecardiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Application and Utility of iPads in Pediatric Tele-echocardiography. / Colombo, Jamie N.; Seckeler, Michael D.; Barber, Brent J.; Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Weinstein, Ronald S; Sisk, David; Lax, Daniela.

In: Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Vol. 22, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. 429-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Colombo, Jamie N. ; Seckeler, Michael D. ; Barber, Brent J. ; Krupinski, Elizabeth A ; Weinstein, Ronald S ; Sisk, David ; Lax, Daniela. / Application and Utility of iPads in Pediatric Tele-echocardiography. In: Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 429-433.
@article{9977e6ed1d3749c5af7587355ee3fdba,
title = "Application and Utility of iPads in Pediatric Tele-echocardiography",
abstract = "Background: Telemedicine is used with increasing frequency to improve patient care in remote areas. The interpretation of medical imaging on iPad{\circledR} (Apple, Cupertino, CA) tablets has been reported to be accurate. There are no studies on the use of iPads for interpretation of pediatric echocardiograms. We compared the quality of echo images, diagnostic accuracy, and review time using three different modalities: remote access on an iPad Air (iPad), remote access via a computer (Remote), and direct access on a computer linked through Ethernet to the server, the {"}gold standard{"} (Direct). Materials and Methods: Fifty consecutive archived pediatric echocardiograms were interpreted using the three modalities. Studies were analyzed blindly by three pediatric cardiologists; review time, diagnostic accuracy, and image quality were documented. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the study diagnoses with the official diagnosis in the patient's chart. Discrepancies between diagnoses were graded as major (more than one grade difference) or minor (one grade difference in severity of lesion). Results: There were no significant differences in accuracy among the three modalities. There was one major discrepancy (size of patent ductus arteriosus); all others were minor, hemodynamically insignificant. Image quality ratings were better for iPad than Remote; Direct had the highest ratings. Review times (mean [standard deviation] minutes) were longest for iPad (5.89 [3.87]) and then Remote (4.72 [2.69]), with Direct having the shortest times (3.52 [1.42]) (p <0.0001). Conclusions: Pediatric echocardiograms can be interpreted using convenient, portable devices while preserving accuracy and quality with slightly longer review times (1-2 min). These findings are important in the current era of increasing need for mobile health.",
keywords = "cardiology/cardiovascular disease, e-health, pediatrics, telecardiology",
author = "Colombo, {Jamie N.} and Seckeler, {Michael D.} and Barber, {Brent J.} and Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and Weinstein, {Ronald S} and David Sisk and Daniela Lax",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/tmj.2015.0114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "429--433",
journal = "Telemedicine Journal and e-Health",
issn = "1530-5627",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application and Utility of iPads in Pediatric Tele-echocardiography

AU - Colombo, Jamie N.

AU - Seckeler, Michael D.

AU - Barber, Brent J.

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Weinstein, Ronald S

AU - Sisk, David

AU - Lax, Daniela

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Background: Telemedicine is used with increasing frequency to improve patient care in remote areas. The interpretation of medical imaging on iPad® (Apple, Cupertino, CA) tablets has been reported to be accurate. There are no studies on the use of iPads for interpretation of pediatric echocardiograms. We compared the quality of echo images, diagnostic accuracy, and review time using three different modalities: remote access on an iPad Air (iPad), remote access via a computer (Remote), and direct access on a computer linked through Ethernet to the server, the "gold standard" (Direct). Materials and Methods: Fifty consecutive archived pediatric echocardiograms were interpreted using the three modalities. Studies were analyzed blindly by three pediatric cardiologists; review time, diagnostic accuracy, and image quality were documented. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the study diagnoses with the official diagnosis in the patient's chart. Discrepancies between diagnoses were graded as major (more than one grade difference) or minor (one grade difference in severity of lesion). Results: There were no significant differences in accuracy among the three modalities. There was one major discrepancy (size of patent ductus arteriosus); all others were minor, hemodynamically insignificant. Image quality ratings were better for iPad than Remote; Direct had the highest ratings. Review times (mean [standard deviation] minutes) were longest for iPad (5.89 [3.87]) and then Remote (4.72 [2.69]), with Direct having the shortest times (3.52 [1.42]) (p <0.0001). Conclusions: Pediatric echocardiograms can be interpreted using convenient, portable devices while preserving accuracy and quality with slightly longer review times (1-2 min). These findings are important in the current era of increasing need for mobile health.

AB - Background: Telemedicine is used with increasing frequency to improve patient care in remote areas. The interpretation of medical imaging on iPad® (Apple, Cupertino, CA) tablets has been reported to be accurate. There are no studies on the use of iPads for interpretation of pediatric echocardiograms. We compared the quality of echo images, diagnostic accuracy, and review time using three different modalities: remote access on an iPad Air (iPad), remote access via a computer (Remote), and direct access on a computer linked through Ethernet to the server, the "gold standard" (Direct). Materials and Methods: Fifty consecutive archived pediatric echocardiograms were interpreted using the three modalities. Studies were analyzed blindly by three pediatric cardiologists; review time, diagnostic accuracy, and image quality were documented. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the study diagnoses with the official diagnosis in the patient's chart. Discrepancies between diagnoses were graded as major (more than one grade difference) or minor (one grade difference in severity of lesion). Results: There were no significant differences in accuracy among the three modalities. There was one major discrepancy (size of patent ductus arteriosus); all others were minor, hemodynamically insignificant. Image quality ratings were better for iPad than Remote; Direct had the highest ratings. Review times (mean [standard deviation] minutes) were longest for iPad (5.89 [3.87]) and then Remote (4.72 [2.69]), with Direct having the shortest times (3.52 [1.42]) (p <0.0001). Conclusions: Pediatric echocardiograms can be interpreted using convenient, portable devices while preserving accuracy and quality with slightly longer review times (1-2 min). These findings are important in the current era of increasing need for mobile health.

KW - cardiology/cardiovascular disease

KW - e-health

KW - pediatrics

KW - telecardiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968820372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968820372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/tmj.2015.0114

DO - 10.1089/tmj.2015.0114

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 429

EP - 433

JO - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

JF - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

SN - 1530-5627

IS - 5

ER -