Applying legal sunshine to the hidden regulation of biological control

Marc L Miller, Gregory H. Aplet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article identifies a serious legal gap in current United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy concerning decisions about the review and release of biological pest control agents. Currently, most of the critical documents and the quantitative evidence underlying USDA decisions and policy related to the petition, review, and release of biological pest control agents (biocontrols) for weeds are inaccessible. Current practices do not provide sufficient information for biologists or an informed public to understand or evaluate policy decisions and environmental outcomes. The USDA needs to comply with federal law by making all relevant documents and data available on the internet. Federal law and policy requires that the USDA release all relevant information, and make it readily accessible to all interested parties. Public disclosure of all relevant documents, along with the scientific evidence related to the review and release of biocontrols, is required by the Administrative Procedure Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, and the Plant Protection Act of 2000. Disclosure of this information will impose at most a trivial financial and administrative burden on the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or the Division of Plant Protection and Quarantine. The importance of full information and open debate in the pursuit of both scientific knowledge and sound environmental management far outweighs any administrative burden.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-365
Number of pages8
JournalBiological Control
Volume35
Issue number3 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

USDA
biological control
solar radiation
agriculture
pest control
plant protection
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
quarantine
biocontrol agent
environmental management
committees
stakeholders
environmental policy
biologists
biological control agents
weed
weeds
regulation
policy
animal

Keywords

  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
  • APHIS
  • Biological controls
  • FOIA
  • Freedom of Information Act
  • Government in the sunshine
  • TAG
  • Technical Advisory Group
  • Transparent government
  • United States Department of Agriculture
  • USDA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Applying legal sunshine to the hidden regulation of biological control. / Miller, Marc L; Aplet, Gregory H.

In: Biological Control, Vol. 35, No. 3 SPEC. ISS., 12.2005, p. 358-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Marc L ; Aplet, Gregory H. / Applying legal sunshine to the hidden regulation of biological control. In: Biological Control. 2005 ; Vol. 35, No. 3 SPEC. ISS. pp. 358-365.
@article{b6ce450e66814ca5a327a9e240b447a0,
title = "Applying legal sunshine to the hidden regulation of biological control",
abstract = "This article identifies a serious legal gap in current United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy concerning decisions about the review and release of biological pest control agents. Currently, most of the critical documents and the quantitative evidence underlying USDA decisions and policy related to the petition, review, and release of biological pest control agents (biocontrols) for weeds are inaccessible. Current practices do not provide sufficient information for biologists or an informed public to understand or evaluate policy decisions and environmental outcomes. The USDA needs to comply with federal law by making all relevant documents and data available on the internet. Federal law and policy requires that the USDA release all relevant information, and make it readily accessible to all interested parties. Public disclosure of all relevant documents, along with the scientific evidence related to the review and release of biocontrols, is required by the Administrative Procedure Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, and the Plant Protection Act of 2000. Disclosure of this information will impose at most a trivial financial and administrative burden on the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or the Division of Plant Protection and Quarantine. The importance of full information and open debate in the pursuit of both scientific knowledge and sound environmental management far outweighs any administrative burden.",
keywords = "Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, APHIS, Biological controls, FOIA, Freedom of Information Act, Government in the sunshine, TAG, Technical Advisory Group, Transparent government, United States Department of Agriculture, USDA",
author = "Miller, {Marc L} and Aplet, {Gregory H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "358--365",
journal = "Biological Control",
issn = "1049-9644",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying legal sunshine to the hidden regulation of biological control

AU - Miller, Marc L

AU - Aplet, Gregory H.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - This article identifies a serious legal gap in current United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy concerning decisions about the review and release of biological pest control agents. Currently, most of the critical documents and the quantitative evidence underlying USDA decisions and policy related to the petition, review, and release of biological pest control agents (biocontrols) for weeds are inaccessible. Current practices do not provide sufficient information for biologists or an informed public to understand or evaluate policy decisions and environmental outcomes. The USDA needs to comply with federal law by making all relevant documents and data available on the internet. Federal law and policy requires that the USDA release all relevant information, and make it readily accessible to all interested parties. Public disclosure of all relevant documents, along with the scientific evidence related to the review and release of biocontrols, is required by the Administrative Procedure Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, and the Plant Protection Act of 2000. Disclosure of this information will impose at most a trivial financial and administrative burden on the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or the Division of Plant Protection and Quarantine. The importance of full information and open debate in the pursuit of both scientific knowledge and sound environmental management far outweighs any administrative burden.

AB - This article identifies a serious legal gap in current United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy concerning decisions about the review and release of biological pest control agents. Currently, most of the critical documents and the quantitative evidence underlying USDA decisions and policy related to the petition, review, and release of biological pest control agents (biocontrols) for weeds are inaccessible. Current practices do not provide sufficient information for biologists or an informed public to understand or evaluate policy decisions and environmental outcomes. The USDA needs to comply with federal law by making all relevant documents and data available on the internet. Federal law and policy requires that the USDA release all relevant information, and make it readily accessible to all interested parties. Public disclosure of all relevant documents, along with the scientific evidence related to the review and release of biocontrols, is required by the Administrative Procedure Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, and the Plant Protection Act of 2000. Disclosure of this information will impose at most a trivial financial and administrative burden on the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or the Division of Plant Protection and Quarantine. The importance of full information and open debate in the pursuit of both scientific knowledge and sound environmental management far outweighs any administrative burden.

KW - Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

KW - APHIS

KW - Biological controls

KW - FOIA

KW - Freedom of Information Act

KW - Government in the sunshine

KW - TAG

KW - Technical Advisory Group

KW - Transparent government

KW - United States Department of Agriculture

KW - USDA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744604249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744604249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27744604249

VL - 35

SP - 358

EP - 365

JO - Biological Control

JF - Biological Control

SN - 1049-9644

IS - 3 SPEC. ISS.

ER -