Approaches to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and their cost

Nayibe Guerrero Moreno, Myriam Cisneros Molina, Dominic F Gervasio, Juan Francisco Pérez Robles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cost analyses developed for fuel cells are reviewed, focusing mainly on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology, because the solid polymer membrane electrolyte is robust and operates under conditions needed for most pressing applications, especially for the automotive application. Presently, PEMFC cost is still too high for large scale commercialization. The cost of electrodes and membranes contributes substantially to the total PEMFC cost which is driving research to reduce the costs of these components so the PEMFC can be introduced into large scale power markets. A scenario analysis for PEMFC costs for an automotive application illustrates that reducing the MEA cost up to 27% makes achievable the $40/kW cost target by 2020, which corresponds to a reduction in the cost of the catalyst by $3.55/kW and the membrane by $0.8/kW. The ultimate cost target for the PEMFC of 30/kW is obtained when the MEA cost is reduced by 45%, which corresponds to a projected cost reduction for catalyst cost by $6.41/kW and membrane by $1.44/kW. If these costs are met, the PEMFC would reach a price which is cost competitive to Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles which would allow the use of PEMFCs for power generation in a significant number of sectors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)897-906
Number of pages10
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 22 2015

Fingerprint

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC)
Costs
Membranes
Catalysts
Cost reduction
Internal combustion engines
Power generation
Fuel cells
Electrolytes

Keywords

  • Bottom up
  • Cost analysis
  • DFMA
  • Fuel cell
  • MEA
  • PEMFC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Approaches to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and their cost. / Guerrero Moreno, Nayibe; Cisneros Molina, Myriam; Gervasio, Dominic F; Pérez Robles, Juan Francisco.

In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 52, 22.08.2015, p. 897-906.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guerrero Moreno, Nayibe ; Cisneros Molina, Myriam ; Gervasio, Dominic F ; Pérez Robles, Juan Francisco. / Approaches to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and their cost. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015 ; Vol. 52. pp. 897-906.
@article{af263e1f90c1439884a7c89fecc6450d,
title = "Approaches to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and their cost",
abstract = "Cost analyses developed for fuel cells are reviewed, focusing mainly on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology, because the solid polymer membrane electrolyte is robust and operates under conditions needed for most pressing applications, especially for the automotive application. Presently, PEMFC cost is still too high for large scale commercialization. The cost of electrodes and membranes contributes substantially to the total PEMFC cost which is driving research to reduce the costs of these components so the PEMFC can be introduced into large scale power markets. A scenario analysis for PEMFC costs for an automotive application illustrates that reducing the MEA cost up to 27{\%} makes achievable the $40/kW cost target by 2020, which corresponds to a reduction in the cost of the catalyst by $3.55/kW and the membrane by $0.8/kW. The ultimate cost target for the PEMFC of 30/kW is obtained when the MEA cost is reduced by 45{\%}, which corresponds to a projected cost reduction for catalyst cost by $6.41/kW and membrane by $1.44/kW. If these costs are met, the PEMFC would reach a price which is cost competitive to Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles which would allow the use of PEMFCs for power generation in a significant number of sectors.",
keywords = "Bottom up, Cost analysis, DFMA, Fuel cell, MEA, PEMFC",
author = "{Guerrero Moreno}, Nayibe and {Cisneros Molina}, Myriam and Gervasio, {Dominic F} and {P{\'e}rez Robles}, {Juan Francisco}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.157",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "897--906",
journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and their cost

AU - Guerrero Moreno, Nayibe

AU - Cisneros Molina, Myriam

AU - Gervasio, Dominic F

AU - Pérez Robles, Juan Francisco

PY - 2015/8/22

Y1 - 2015/8/22

N2 - Cost analyses developed for fuel cells are reviewed, focusing mainly on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology, because the solid polymer membrane electrolyte is robust and operates under conditions needed for most pressing applications, especially for the automotive application. Presently, PEMFC cost is still too high for large scale commercialization. The cost of electrodes and membranes contributes substantially to the total PEMFC cost which is driving research to reduce the costs of these components so the PEMFC can be introduced into large scale power markets. A scenario analysis for PEMFC costs for an automotive application illustrates that reducing the MEA cost up to 27% makes achievable the $40/kW cost target by 2020, which corresponds to a reduction in the cost of the catalyst by $3.55/kW and the membrane by $0.8/kW. The ultimate cost target for the PEMFC of 30/kW is obtained when the MEA cost is reduced by 45%, which corresponds to a projected cost reduction for catalyst cost by $6.41/kW and membrane by $1.44/kW. If these costs are met, the PEMFC would reach a price which is cost competitive to Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles which would allow the use of PEMFCs for power generation in a significant number of sectors.

AB - Cost analyses developed for fuel cells are reviewed, focusing mainly on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology, because the solid polymer membrane electrolyte is robust and operates under conditions needed for most pressing applications, especially for the automotive application. Presently, PEMFC cost is still too high for large scale commercialization. The cost of electrodes and membranes contributes substantially to the total PEMFC cost which is driving research to reduce the costs of these components so the PEMFC can be introduced into large scale power markets. A scenario analysis for PEMFC costs for an automotive application illustrates that reducing the MEA cost up to 27% makes achievable the $40/kW cost target by 2020, which corresponds to a reduction in the cost of the catalyst by $3.55/kW and the membrane by $0.8/kW. The ultimate cost target for the PEMFC of 30/kW is obtained when the MEA cost is reduced by 45%, which corresponds to a projected cost reduction for catalyst cost by $6.41/kW and membrane by $1.44/kW. If these costs are met, the PEMFC would reach a price which is cost competitive to Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles which would allow the use of PEMFCs for power generation in a significant number of sectors.

KW - Bottom up

KW - Cost analysis

KW - DFMA

KW - Fuel cell

KW - MEA

KW - PEMFC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939782651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939782651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.157

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.157

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 897

EP - 906

JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -