Approximate methods for uncertainty analysis of water distribution systems

D. S. Kang, M. F K Pasha, Kevin E Lansey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) has been commonly applied for uncertainty analysis of model predictions. However, when modelling a water distribution system under unsteady conditions, the computational demand of MCS is quite high even for a reasonably sized system. The aim of this study is to evaluate alternative approximation schemes and examine their ability to predict model prediction uncertainty with less computational effort. Here, MCS is compared with a point estimation method, the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, and a quasi-MCS method, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS). Hydraulic and water quality simulations are performed using EPANET and the evaluated model outputs are nodal pressure, water age and chlorine concentration. Six input parameters, pipe diameter and roughness coefficient, nodal spatial and temporal demands and bulk and wall decay coefficients, are considered. To examine the effect of the magnitude of input uncertainty on model output, three uncertainty levels are evaluated. The study is performed for a real system with 116 pipes and 90 nodes. Results demonstrate that LHS provides very good estimates of the predicted output range for steady and unsteady conditions compared with MCS, while FOSM did well for steady conditions but poorly for some periods in the extended-period simulation for chlorine concentration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-249
Number of pages17
JournalUrban Water Journal
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

uncertainty analysis
distribution system
uncertainty
water
simulation
chlorine
pipe
sampling
estimation method
prediction
water distribution system
method
roughness
hydraulics
water quality
demand
ability
modeling

Keywords

  • Latin hypercube
  • Monte carlo
  • Uncertainty
  • Water distribution
  • Water quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Approximate methods for uncertainty analysis of water distribution systems. / Kang, D. S.; Pasha, M. F K; Lansey, Kevin E.

In: Urban Water Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 233-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac1d66f1408a4007970b053ba6fde9d4,
title = "Approximate methods for uncertainty analysis of water distribution systems",
abstract = "Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) has been commonly applied for uncertainty analysis of model predictions. However, when modelling a water distribution system under unsteady conditions, the computational demand of MCS is quite high even for a reasonably sized system. The aim of this study is to evaluate alternative approximation schemes and examine their ability to predict model prediction uncertainty with less computational effort. Here, MCS is compared with a point estimation method, the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, and a quasi-MCS method, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS). Hydraulic and water quality simulations are performed using EPANET and the evaluated model outputs are nodal pressure, water age and chlorine concentration. Six input parameters, pipe diameter and roughness coefficient, nodal spatial and temporal demands and bulk and wall decay coefficients, are considered. To examine the effect of the magnitude of input uncertainty on model output, three uncertainty levels are evaluated. The study is performed for a real system with 116 pipes and 90 nodes. Results demonstrate that LHS provides very good estimates of the predicted output range for steady and unsteady conditions compared with MCS, while FOSM did well for steady conditions but poorly for some periods in the extended-period simulation for chlorine concentration.",
keywords = "Latin hypercube, Monte carlo, Uncertainty, Water distribution, Water quality",
author = "Kang, {D. S.} and Pasha, {M. F K} and Lansey, {Kevin E}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/15730620802566844",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "233--249",
journal = "Urban Water Journal",
issn = "1573-062X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approximate methods for uncertainty analysis of water distribution systems

AU - Kang, D. S.

AU - Pasha, M. F K

AU - Lansey, Kevin E

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) has been commonly applied for uncertainty analysis of model predictions. However, when modelling a water distribution system under unsteady conditions, the computational demand of MCS is quite high even for a reasonably sized system. The aim of this study is to evaluate alternative approximation schemes and examine their ability to predict model prediction uncertainty with less computational effort. Here, MCS is compared with a point estimation method, the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, and a quasi-MCS method, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS). Hydraulic and water quality simulations are performed using EPANET and the evaluated model outputs are nodal pressure, water age and chlorine concentration. Six input parameters, pipe diameter and roughness coefficient, nodal spatial and temporal demands and bulk and wall decay coefficients, are considered. To examine the effect of the magnitude of input uncertainty on model output, three uncertainty levels are evaluated. The study is performed for a real system with 116 pipes and 90 nodes. Results demonstrate that LHS provides very good estimates of the predicted output range for steady and unsteady conditions compared with MCS, while FOSM did well for steady conditions but poorly for some periods in the extended-period simulation for chlorine concentration.

AB - Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) has been commonly applied for uncertainty analysis of model predictions. However, when modelling a water distribution system under unsteady conditions, the computational demand of MCS is quite high even for a reasonably sized system. The aim of this study is to evaluate alternative approximation schemes and examine their ability to predict model prediction uncertainty with less computational effort. Here, MCS is compared with a point estimation method, the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, and a quasi-MCS method, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS). Hydraulic and water quality simulations are performed using EPANET and the evaluated model outputs are nodal pressure, water age and chlorine concentration. Six input parameters, pipe diameter and roughness coefficient, nodal spatial and temporal demands and bulk and wall decay coefficients, are considered. To examine the effect of the magnitude of input uncertainty on model output, three uncertainty levels are evaluated. The study is performed for a real system with 116 pipes and 90 nodes. Results demonstrate that LHS provides very good estimates of the predicted output range for steady and unsteady conditions compared with MCS, while FOSM did well for steady conditions but poorly for some periods in the extended-period simulation for chlorine concentration.

KW - Latin hypercube

KW - Monte carlo

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Water distribution

KW - Water quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75149155624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75149155624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15730620802566844

DO - 10.1080/15730620802566844

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 233

EP - 249

JO - Urban Water Journal

JF - Urban Water Journal

SN - 1573-062X

IS - 3

ER -