Are All Species Equal?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This article considers the defensibility of "species egalitarianism"-the position that all living things have equal moral standing and therefore all species command our respect. It challenges the view that there are good reasons to believe that all living things have moral standing in even a minimal sense. It explains why members of other species understandably and justifiably command our respect, but also why they cannot command equal respect. It also argues that there is reason to doubt that species egalitarianism is compatible with true respect for nature. The theory improperly suggests that the moral standing of dolphins is no higher than that of tuna, and that the standing of chimpanzees is no higher than that of mice. Such a view does not give dolphins and chimpanzees the respect they deserve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780199940134, 9780195371963
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

Moral Standing
Egalitarianism
Chimpanzee
Mouse
Nature

Keywords

  • Command respect
  • Moral standing
  • Nature
  • Species egalitarianism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Schmidtz, D. J. (2012). Are All Species Equal? In The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.013.0023

Are All Species Equal? / Schmidtz, David J.

The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Schmidtz, DJ 2012, Are All Species Equal? in The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.013.0023
Schmidtz DJ. Are All Species Equal? In The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.013.0023
Schmidtz, David J. / Are All Species Equal?. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{5a2ca469ea6c4877bbd1148a2c7ef582,
title = "Are All Species Equal?",
abstract = "This article considers the defensibility of {"}species egalitarianism{"}-the position that all living things have equal moral standing and therefore all species command our respect. It challenges the view that there are good reasons to believe that all living things have moral standing in even a minimal sense. It explains why members of other species understandably and justifiably command our respect, but also why they cannot command equal respect. It also argues that there is reason to doubt that species egalitarianism is compatible with true respect for nature. The theory improperly suggests that the moral standing of dolphins is no higher than that of tuna, and that the standing of chimpanzees is no higher than that of mice. Such a view does not give dolphins and chimpanzees the respect they deserve.",
keywords = "Command respect, Moral standing, Nature, Species egalitarianism",
author = "Schmidtz, {David J}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.013.0023",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199940134",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Are All Species Equal?

AU - Schmidtz, David J

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - This article considers the defensibility of "species egalitarianism"-the position that all living things have equal moral standing and therefore all species command our respect. It challenges the view that there are good reasons to believe that all living things have moral standing in even a minimal sense. It explains why members of other species understandably and justifiably command our respect, but also why they cannot command equal respect. It also argues that there is reason to doubt that species egalitarianism is compatible with true respect for nature. The theory improperly suggests that the moral standing of dolphins is no higher than that of tuna, and that the standing of chimpanzees is no higher than that of mice. Such a view does not give dolphins and chimpanzees the respect they deserve.

AB - This article considers the defensibility of "species egalitarianism"-the position that all living things have equal moral standing and therefore all species command our respect. It challenges the view that there are good reasons to believe that all living things have moral standing in even a minimal sense. It explains why members of other species understandably and justifiably command our respect, but also why they cannot command equal respect. It also argues that there is reason to doubt that species egalitarianism is compatible with true respect for nature. The theory improperly suggests that the moral standing of dolphins is no higher than that of tuna, and that the standing of chimpanzees is no higher than that of mice. Such a view does not give dolphins and chimpanzees the respect they deserve.

KW - Command respect

KW - Moral standing

KW - Nature

KW - Species egalitarianism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923395671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923395671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.013.0023

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195371963.013.0023

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923395671

SN - 9780199940134

SN - 9780195371963

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -