Arizona permittee and land management agency employee attitudes toward rangeland monitoring by permittees

Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez, Susan Jorstad McClaran, George B Ruyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ongoing conflicts over the management of western rangelands can be attributed in part to the lack of reliable information about current ecological conditions and their causes due, in turn, to insufficient monitoring. To meet the monitoring shortfall, land management agencies increasingly are enlisting permittees to monitor their grazing allotments. We surveyed grazing permittees in 5 Arizona counties and land management agency employees throughout Arizona to compare their attitudes toward permittee monitoring on public rangelands, the role of government in rangeland management, rangeland conditions in Arizona, and the credibility of information sources about rangelands. Permittees and agency employees differed in most of the attitudes measured by our survey. However, both populations agreed that permittees should participate in monitoring their allotments, and many respondents agreed with making permittee monitoring mandatory. Many respondents in both groups also agreed that collaboration can be beneficial. Joint monitoring, which can be considered a type of "joint fact-finding," may help improve agency-permittee relationships and bridge the gap in attitudes and underlying values. Permittee-monitoring programs deserve careful evaluation to determine their impacts on social relationships, management decisions, and ecological conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)344-351
Number of pages8
JournalRangeland Ecology and Management
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

land management
rangeland
rangelands
human resources
monitoring
grazing
range management
information sources

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Cooperative Extension
  • Grazing permittees
  • Joint fact-finding
  • Mail survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Arizona permittee and land management agency employee attitudes toward rangeland monitoring by permittees. / Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.; McClaran, Susan Jorstad; Ruyle, George B.

In: Rangeland Ecology and Management, Vol. 58, No. 4, 07.2005, p. 344-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3efdfacbad6d434bbad18f09adb0ccff,
title = "Arizona permittee and land management agency employee attitudes toward rangeland monitoring by permittees",
abstract = "Ongoing conflicts over the management of western rangelands can be attributed in part to the lack of reliable information about current ecological conditions and their causes due, in turn, to insufficient monitoring. To meet the monitoring shortfall, land management agencies increasingly are enlisting permittees to monitor their grazing allotments. We surveyed grazing permittees in 5 Arizona counties and land management agency employees throughout Arizona to compare their attitudes toward permittee monitoring on public rangelands, the role of government in rangeland management, rangeland conditions in Arizona, and the credibility of information sources about rangelands. Permittees and agency employees differed in most of the attitudes measured by our survey. However, both populations agreed that permittees should participate in monitoring their allotments, and many respondents agreed with making permittee monitoring mandatory. Many respondents in both groups also agreed that collaboration can be beneficial. Joint monitoring, which can be considered a type of {"}joint fact-finding,{"} may help improve agency-permittee relationships and bridge the gap in attitudes and underlying values. Permittee-monitoring programs deserve careful evaluation to determine their impacts on social relationships, management decisions, and ecological conditions.",
keywords = "Collaboration, Cooperative Extension, Grazing permittees, Joint fact-finding, Mail survey",
author = "Fernandez-Gimenez, {Maria E.} and McClaran, {Susan Jorstad} and Ruyle, {George B}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.2111/1551-5028(2005)058[0344:APALMA]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "344--351",
journal = "Rangeland Ecology and Management",
issn = "1550-7424",
publisher = "Society for Range Management",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arizona permittee and land management agency employee attitudes toward rangeland monitoring by permittees

AU - Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.

AU - McClaran, Susan Jorstad

AU - Ruyle, George B

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Ongoing conflicts over the management of western rangelands can be attributed in part to the lack of reliable information about current ecological conditions and their causes due, in turn, to insufficient monitoring. To meet the monitoring shortfall, land management agencies increasingly are enlisting permittees to monitor their grazing allotments. We surveyed grazing permittees in 5 Arizona counties and land management agency employees throughout Arizona to compare their attitudes toward permittee monitoring on public rangelands, the role of government in rangeland management, rangeland conditions in Arizona, and the credibility of information sources about rangelands. Permittees and agency employees differed in most of the attitudes measured by our survey. However, both populations agreed that permittees should participate in monitoring their allotments, and many respondents agreed with making permittee monitoring mandatory. Many respondents in both groups also agreed that collaboration can be beneficial. Joint monitoring, which can be considered a type of "joint fact-finding," may help improve agency-permittee relationships and bridge the gap in attitudes and underlying values. Permittee-monitoring programs deserve careful evaluation to determine their impacts on social relationships, management decisions, and ecological conditions.

AB - Ongoing conflicts over the management of western rangelands can be attributed in part to the lack of reliable information about current ecological conditions and their causes due, in turn, to insufficient monitoring. To meet the monitoring shortfall, land management agencies increasingly are enlisting permittees to monitor their grazing allotments. We surveyed grazing permittees in 5 Arizona counties and land management agency employees throughout Arizona to compare their attitudes toward permittee monitoring on public rangelands, the role of government in rangeland management, rangeland conditions in Arizona, and the credibility of information sources about rangelands. Permittees and agency employees differed in most of the attitudes measured by our survey. However, both populations agreed that permittees should participate in monitoring their allotments, and many respondents agreed with making permittee monitoring mandatory. Many respondents in both groups also agreed that collaboration can be beneficial. Joint monitoring, which can be considered a type of "joint fact-finding," may help improve agency-permittee relationships and bridge the gap in attitudes and underlying values. Permittee-monitoring programs deserve careful evaluation to determine their impacts on social relationships, management decisions, and ecological conditions.

KW - Collaboration

KW - Cooperative Extension

KW - Grazing permittees

KW - Joint fact-finding

KW - Mail survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23744452983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23744452983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)058[0344:APALMA]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)058[0344:APALMA]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23744452983

VL - 58

SP - 344

EP - 351

JO - Rangeland Ecology and Management

JF - Rangeland Ecology and Management

SN - 1550-7424

IS - 4

ER -