Artifact densities and assemblage formation: Evidence from Tabun Cave

Steven L Kuhn, Amy E. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Archaeological assemblages are fundamentally records of discard behavior. Lewis Binford's pioneering ethnoarchaeological research focused attention on the differing pathways that lead to artifacts being abandoned in different locations on the landscape. Recurring relationships between artifact density and assemblage content at Middle and Upper Paleolithic sites reflect simple behavioral dynamics pertaining to artifact production and discard. In the very long archaeological sequence from A. Jelinek's excavations at Tabun Cave, Mousterian assemblages show the expected pattern, but earlier Acheulean, Amudian and Yabrudian assemblages do not. In combination with evidence that different classes of artifacts were discarded at different rates, these results suggest that land use and raw material provisioning in the later Middle Pleistocene were organized differently than they were among later populations of Neanderthals and modern humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-16
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Anthropological Archaeology
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Caves
Excavation
Land use
artifact
Raw materials
evidence
raw materials
land use
Artifact
Assemblages

Keywords

  • Artifact discard behavior
  • Israel
  • Land use
  • Middle Pleistocene
  • Mousterian assemblages
  • Raw material procurement
  • Tabun Cave

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Archaeology
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Artifact densities and assemblage formation : Evidence from Tabun Cave. / Kuhn, Steven L; Clark, Amy E.

In: Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Vol. 38, 01.05.2015, p. 8-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{abb92026a84d453ab1a8aa6220c7b266,
title = "Artifact densities and assemblage formation: Evidence from Tabun Cave",
abstract = "Archaeological assemblages are fundamentally records of discard behavior. Lewis Binford's pioneering ethnoarchaeological research focused attention on the differing pathways that lead to artifacts being abandoned in different locations on the landscape. Recurring relationships between artifact density and assemblage content at Middle and Upper Paleolithic sites reflect simple behavioral dynamics pertaining to artifact production and discard. In the very long archaeological sequence from A. Jelinek's excavations at Tabun Cave, Mousterian assemblages show the expected pattern, but earlier Acheulean, Amudian and Yabrudian assemblages do not. In combination with evidence that different classes of artifacts were discarded at different rates, these results suggest that land use and raw material provisioning in the later Middle Pleistocene were organized differently than they were among later populations of Neanderthals and modern humans.",
keywords = "Artifact discard behavior, Israel, Land use, Middle Pleistocene, Mousterian assemblages, Raw material procurement, Tabun Cave",
author = "Kuhn, {Steven L} and Clark, {Amy E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaa.2014.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "8--16",
journal = "Journal of Anthropological Archaeology",
issn = "0278-4165",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Artifact densities and assemblage formation

T2 - Evidence from Tabun Cave

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

AU - Clark, Amy E.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Archaeological assemblages are fundamentally records of discard behavior. Lewis Binford's pioneering ethnoarchaeological research focused attention on the differing pathways that lead to artifacts being abandoned in different locations on the landscape. Recurring relationships between artifact density and assemblage content at Middle and Upper Paleolithic sites reflect simple behavioral dynamics pertaining to artifact production and discard. In the very long archaeological sequence from A. Jelinek's excavations at Tabun Cave, Mousterian assemblages show the expected pattern, but earlier Acheulean, Amudian and Yabrudian assemblages do not. In combination with evidence that different classes of artifacts were discarded at different rates, these results suggest that land use and raw material provisioning in the later Middle Pleistocene were organized differently than they were among later populations of Neanderthals and modern humans.

AB - Archaeological assemblages are fundamentally records of discard behavior. Lewis Binford's pioneering ethnoarchaeological research focused attention on the differing pathways that lead to artifacts being abandoned in different locations on the landscape. Recurring relationships between artifact density and assemblage content at Middle and Upper Paleolithic sites reflect simple behavioral dynamics pertaining to artifact production and discard. In the very long archaeological sequence from A. Jelinek's excavations at Tabun Cave, Mousterian assemblages show the expected pattern, but earlier Acheulean, Amudian and Yabrudian assemblages do not. In combination with evidence that different classes of artifacts were discarded at different rates, these results suggest that land use and raw material provisioning in the later Middle Pleistocene were organized differently than they were among later populations of Neanderthals and modern humans.

KW - Artifact discard behavior

KW - Israel

KW - Land use

KW - Middle Pleistocene

KW - Mousterian assemblages

KW - Raw material procurement

KW - Tabun Cave

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939952773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939952773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaa.2014.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jaa.2014.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939952773

VL - 38

SP - 8

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

JF - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

SN - 0278-4165

ER -