Ascertainment corrected rates: Applications of capture-recapture methods

Daniel J. Mccarty, Eugene S. Tull, Claudia S. Moy, C. Kent Kwoh, Ronald E. Laporte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

167 Scopus citations

Abstract

Accurate rates, though fundamental to epidemiology, are often very difficult to obtain. Incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates have traditionally been established through either passive reporting surveillance systems, through active surveillance systems, or by a combination of the two methods. Typically, when researchers employ these approaches they do not formally evaluate or correct for the degree of underascertainment. Undercount of cases is a potent deter minant of rates which we cannot continue to ignore. We believe all rates should be adjusted for underascertainment in order to achieve a truer picture of the risk and risk factors of disease. Here, we present a procedure to ascertainment correct rates based upon well established capture-recapture methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)559-565
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ascertainment corrected rates: Applications of capture-recapture methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this