Aspirations and common tensions

Larger lessons from the third US national climate assessment

Susanne C. Moser, Jerry M. Melillo, Katharine Jacobs, Richard H. Moss, James l Buizer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) was produced by experts in response to the US Global Change Research Act of 1990. Based on lessons learned from previous domestic and international assessments, the NCA3 was designed to speak to a broad public and inform the concerns of policy- and decision-makers at different scales. The NCA3 was also intended to be the first step in an ongoing assessment process that would build the nation’s capacity to respond to climate change. This concluding paper draws larger lessons from the insights gained throughout the assessment process that are of significance to future US and international assessment designers. We bring attention to process and products delivered, communication and engagement efforts, and how they contributed to the sustained assessment. Based on areas where expectations were exceeded or not fully met, we address four common tensions that all assessment designers must confront and manage: between (1) core assessment ingredients (knowledge base, institutional set-up, principled process, and the people involved), (2) national scope and subnational adaptive management information needs, (3) scope, complexity, and manageability, and (4) deliberate evaluation and ongoing learning approaches. Managing these tensions, amidst the social and political contexts in which assessments are conducted, is critical to ensure that assessments are feasible and productive, while its outcomes are perceived as credible, salient, and legitimate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSpringer Climate
PublisherSpringer
Pages187-201
Number of pages15
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Publication series

NameSpringer Climate
ISSN (Print)2352-0698
ISSN (Electronic)2352-0701

Fingerprint

adaptive management
climate
global change
learning
communication
climate change
decision
evaluation
need
policy
product
public

Keywords

  • Assessment designer
  • Assessment process
  • Author team
  • Climate service
  • Sustained assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Moser, S. C., Melillo, J. M., Jacobs, K., Moss, R. H., & Buizer, J. L. (2016). Aspirations and common tensions: Larger lessons from the third US national climate assessment. In Springer Climate (pp. 187-201). (Springer Climate). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5_14

Aspirations and common tensions : Larger lessons from the third US national climate assessment. / Moser, Susanne C.; Melillo, Jerry M.; Jacobs, Katharine; Moss, Richard H.; Buizer, James l.

Springer Climate. Springer, 2016. p. 187-201 (Springer Climate).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Moser, Susanne C. ; Melillo, Jerry M. ; Jacobs, Katharine ; Moss, Richard H. ; Buizer, James l. / Aspirations and common tensions : Larger lessons from the third US national climate assessment. Springer Climate. Springer, 2016. pp. 187-201 (Springer Climate).
@inbook{1cd489a9f4e04e8bb9ad34131e846cb0,
title = "Aspirations and common tensions: Larger lessons from the third US national climate assessment",
abstract = "The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) was produced by experts in response to the US Global Change Research Act of 1990. Based on lessons learned from previous domestic and international assessments, the NCA3 was designed to speak to a broad public and inform the concerns of policy- and decision-makers at different scales. The NCA3 was also intended to be the first step in an ongoing assessment process that would build the nation’s capacity to respond to climate change. This concluding paper draws larger lessons from the insights gained throughout the assessment process that are of significance to future US and international assessment designers. We bring attention to process and products delivered, communication and engagement efforts, and how they contributed to the sustained assessment. Based on areas where expectations were exceeded or not fully met, we address four common tensions that all assessment designers must confront and manage: between (1) core assessment ingredients (knowledge base, institutional set-up, principled process, and the people involved), (2) national scope and subnational adaptive management information needs, (3) scope, complexity, and manageability, and (4) deliberate evaluation and ongoing learning approaches. Managing these tensions, amidst the social and political contexts in which assessments are conducted, is critical to ensure that assessments are feasible and productive, while its outcomes are perceived as credible, salient, and legitimate.",
keywords = "Assessment designer, Assessment process, Author team, Climate service, Sustained assessment",
author = "Moser, {Susanne C.} and Melillo, {Jerry M.} and Katharine Jacobs and Moss, {Richard H.} and Buizer, {James l}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5_14",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Springer Climate",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "187--201",
booktitle = "Springer Climate",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Aspirations and common tensions

T2 - Larger lessons from the third US national climate assessment

AU - Moser, Susanne C.

AU - Melillo, Jerry M.

AU - Jacobs, Katharine

AU - Moss, Richard H.

AU - Buizer, James l

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) was produced by experts in response to the US Global Change Research Act of 1990. Based on lessons learned from previous domestic and international assessments, the NCA3 was designed to speak to a broad public and inform the concerns of policy- and decision-makers at different scales. The NCA3 was also intended to be the first step in an ongoing assessment process that would build the nation’s capacity to respond to climate change. This concluding paper draws larger lessons from the insights gained throughout the assessment process that are of significance to future US and international assessment designers. We bring attention to process and products delivered, communication and engagement efforts, and how they contributed to the sustained assessment. Based on areas where expectations were exceeded or not fully met, we address four common tensions that all assessment designers must confront and manage: between (1) core assessment ingredients (knowledge base, institutional set-up, principled process, and the people involved), (2) national scope and subnational adaptive management information needs, (3) scope, complexity, and manageability, and (4) deliberate evaluation and ongoing learning approaches. Managing these tensions, amidst the social and political contexts in which assessments are conducted, is critical to ensure that assessments are feasible and productive, while its outcomes are perceived as credible, salient, and legitimate.

AB - The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) was produced by experts in response to the US Global Change Research Act of 1990. Based on lessons learned from previous domestic and international assessments, the NCA3 was designed to speak to a broad public and inform the concerns of policy- and decision-makers at different scales. The NCA3 was also intended to be the first step in an ongoing assessment process that would build the nation’s capacity to respond to climate change. This concluding paper draws larger lessons from the insights gained throughout the assessment process that are of significance to future US and international assessment designers. We bring attention to process and products delivered, communication and engagement efforts, and how they contributed to the sustained assessment. Based on areas where expectations were exceeded or not fully met, we address four common tensions that all assessment designers must confront and manage: between (1) core assessment ingredients (knowledge base, institutional set-up, principled process, and the people involved), (2) national scope and subnational adaptive management information needs, (3) scope, complexity, and manageability, and (4) deliberate evaluation and ongoing learning approaches. Managing these tensions, amidst the social and political contexts in which assessments are conducted, is critical to ensure that assessments are feasible and productive, while its outcomes are perceived as credible, salient, and legitimate.

KW - Assessment designer

KW - Assessment process

KW - Author team

KW - Climate service

KW - Sustained assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067971289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067971289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5_14

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5_14

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Springer Climate

SP - 187

EP - 201

BT - Springer Climate

PB - Springer

ER -