Assessing medical history in coronary heart disease surveillance

Agreement between contemporaneous and retrospective methods

Wayne D. Rosamond, Eyal Shahar, Russell V. Luepker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coronary heart disease surveillance studies require monitoring of hospitalized events. Retrospective record reviews and patient interviews during hospitalization are common surveillance methods. This study reports the agreement between these two methods in assessing medical history among 4,230 patients enrolled in the Minnesota Heart Survey Registry. Agreements between methods in determining a patient's history of stroke, myocardial infarction, and hypertension were substantial (kappa coefficients >0.69). Agreements on acute chest pain (kappa coefficient = 0.39) and ever-smoking status (kappa coefficient = 0.43) were only moderate. In determining medical history, retrospective medical record surveillance appears to be comparable to more direct, yet more expensive, contemporaneous methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-449
Number of pages3
JournalEpidemiology
Volume7
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Disease
Acute Pain
Chest Pain
Medical Records
Registries
Hospitalization
Smoking
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Interviews
Hypertension

Keywords

  • cerebrovascular disease
  • community surveillance
  • coronary heart disease
  • data collection
  • epidemiologic methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Assessing medical history in coronary heart disease surveillance : Agreement between contemporaneous and retrospective methods. / Rosamond, Wayne D.; Shahar, Eyal; Luepker, Russell V.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1996, p. 447-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4830a87e924447b992a477353104054e,
title = "Assessing medical history in coronary heart disease surveillance: Agreement between contemporaneous and retrospective methods",
abstract = "Coronary heart disease surveillance studies require monitoring of hospitalized events. Retrospective record reviews and patient interviews during hospitalization are common surveillance methods. This study reports the agreement between these two methods in assessing medical history among 4,230 patients enrolled in the Minnesota Heart Survey Registry. Agreements between methods in determining a patient's history of stroke, myocardial infarction, and hypertension were substantial (kappa coefficients >0.69). Agreements on acute chest pain (kappa coefficient = 0.39) and ever-smoking status (kappa coefficient = 0.43) were only moderate. In determining medical history, retrospective medical record surveillance appears to be comparable to more direct, yet more expensive, contemporaneous methods.",
keywords = "cerebrovascular disease, community surveillance, coronary heart disease, data collection, epidemiologic methods",
author = "Rosamond, {Wayne D.} and Eyal Shahar and Luepker, {Russell V.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "447--449",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing medical history in coronary heart disease surveillance

T2 - Agreement between contemporaneous and retrospective methods

AU - Rosamond, Wayne D.

AU - Shahar, Eyal

AU - Luepker, Russell V.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Coronary heart disease surveillance studies require monitoring of hospitalized events. Retrospective record reviews and patient interviews during hospitalization are common surveillance methods. This study reports the agreement between these two methods in assessing medical history among 4,230 patients enrolled in the Minnesota Heart Survey Registry. Agreements between methods in determining a patient's history of stroke, myocardial infarction, and hypertension were substantial (kappa coefficients >0.69). Agreements on acute chest pain (kappa coefficient = 0.39) and ever-smoking status (kappa coefficient = 0.43) were only moderate. In determining medical history, retrospective medical record surveillance appears to be comparable to more direct, yet more expensive, contemporaneous methods.

AB - Coronary heart disease surveillance studies require monitoring of hospitalized events. Retrospective record reviews and patient interviews during hospitalization are common surveillance methods. This study reports the agreement between these two methods in assessing medical history among 4,230 patients enrolled in the Minnesota Heart Survey Registry. Agreements between methods in determining a patient's history of stroke, myocardial infarction, and hypertension were substantial (kappa coefficients >0.69). Agreements on acute chest pain (kappa coefficient = 0.39) and ever-smoking status (kappa coefficient = 0.43) were only moderate. In determining medical history, retrospective medical record surveillance appears to be comparable to more direct, yet more expensive, contemporaneous methods.

KW - cerebrovascular disease

KW - community surveillance

KW - coronary heart disease

KW - data collection

KW - epidemiologic methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029982668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029982668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 447

EP - 449

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 4

ER -