Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases: Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice

Julie C. Duvall, Richard J Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2002, the United States Supreme Court decided the Atkins case, which held that mentally retarded defendants could not be executed. The opinion gave no guidance on the definition of mental retardation, preferring to leave to individual states the task of determining not only the definition of mental retardation but also the assessment procedures to be used in making the diagnosis. This lack of guidance has resulted in many issues, including varying definitions of what constitutes mental retardation across states, use of different assessment procedures to make the determination that a person has mental retardation, and numerous psychometric concerns regarding the provision of psychological assessment services to the courts in capital cases that involve a defendant who may have mental retardation. This article examines these latter issues in detail from both psychological and legal perspectives and makes recommendations for practicing psychologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)658-665
Number of pages8
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Capital Punishment
Intellectual Disability
Psychology
Supreme Court Decisions
Mentally Disabled Persons
Psychometrics

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Mental retardation death penalty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{7b5176b5642c4b22b56fe62022c031e6,
title = "Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases: Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice",
abstract = "In 2002, the United States Supreme Court decided the Atkins case, which held that mentally retarded defendants could not be executed. The opinion gave no guidance on the definition of mental retardation, preferring to leave to individual states the task of determining not only the definition of mental retardation but also the assessment procedures to be used in making the diagnosis. This lack of guidance has resulted in many issues, including varying definitions of what constitutes mental retardation across states, use of different assessment procedures to make the determination that a person has mental retardation, and numerous psychometric concerns regarding the provision of psychological assessment services to the courts in capital cases that involve a defendant who may have mental retardation. This article examines these latter issues in detail from both psychological and legal perspectives and makes recommendations for practicing psychologists.",
keywords = "Assessment, Mental retardation death penalty",
author = "Duvall, {Julie C.} and Morris, {Richard J}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/0735-7028.37.6.658",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "658--665",
journal = "Professional Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "0735-7028",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases

T2 - Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice

AU - Duvall, Julie C.

AU - Morris, Richard J

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - In 2002, the United States Supreme Court decided the Atkins case, which held that mentally retarded defendants could not be executed. The opinion gave no guidance on the definition of mental retardation, preferring to leave to individual states the task of determining not only the definition of mental retardation but also the assessment procedures to be used in making the diagnosis. This lack of guidance has resulted in many issues, including varying definitions of what constitutes mental retardation across states, use of different assessment procedures to make the determination that a person has mental retardation, and numerous psychometric concerns regarding the provision of psychological assessment services to the courts in capital cases that involve a defendant who may have mental retardation. This article examines these latter issues in detail from both psychological and legal perspectives and makes recommendations for practicing psychologists.

AB - In 2002, the United States Supreme Court decided the Atkins case, which held that mentally retarded defendants could not be executed. The opinion gave no guidance on the definition of mental retardation, preferring to leave to individual states the task of determining not only the definition of mental retardation but also the assessment procedures to be used in making the diagnosis. This lack of guidance has resulted in many issues, including varying definitions of what constitutes mental retardation across states, use of different assessment procedures to make the determination that a person has mental retardation, and numerous psychometric concerns regarding the provision of psychological assessment services to the courts in capital cases that involve a defendant who may have mental retardation. This article examines these latter issues in detail from both psychological and legal perspectives and makes recommendations for practicing psychologists.

KW - Assessment

KW - Mental retardation death penalty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845602196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845602196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0735-7028.37.6.658

DO - 10.1037/0735-7028.37.6.658

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845602196

VL - 37

SP - 658

EP - 665

JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 0735-7028

IS - 6

ER -