Assessing the counterfactual: The efficacy of drug interdiction absent racial profiling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This Article investigates the costs and benefits of racial profiling in the context of drug interdiction. I begin by reviewing the empirical economic and civil rights literature regarding the existence and rationality of racial profiling and then build an explicit model of a trooper's decision to search a stopped vehicle. Estimating the model using stop and search data from a portion of Interstate 95 in Maryland, I find that the Maryland State Police use the motorist's race as a factor in deciding which stopped vehicles to search. This result persists even after controlling for many other descriptive variables that impact the trooper's decision to search. I then introduce an additional model that controls for race's role in the search decision and estimates the counterfactual: the change in the amount of drugs the police would find if they ignored race as a factor [*pg 1090] in the search decision. Applying that model, I find that race is the strongest predictor of identifying drug traffickers, but that racial profiling comes at significant cost, as black motorists who are subject to search are also more likely to be innocent than their white counterparts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1089-1141
Number of pages53
JournalDuke Law Journal
Volume54
Issue number5
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

drug
police
costs
civil rights
rationality
economics
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Assessing the counterfactual : The efficacy of drug interdiction absent racial profiling. / Barnes, Katherine -.

In: Duke Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 5, 03.2005, p. 1089-1141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e4bf0c70849c4973be5681e6720eb98b,
title = "Assessing the counterfactual: The efficacy of drug interdiction absent racial profiling",
abstract = "This Article investigates the costs and benefits of racial profiling in the context of drug interdiction. I begin by reviewing the empirical economic and civil rights literature regarding the existence and rationality of racial profiling and then build an explicit model of a trooper's decision to search a stopped vehicle. Estimating the model using stop and search data from a portion of Interstate 95 in Maryland, I find that the Maryland State Police use the motorist's race as a factor in deciding which stopped vehicles to search. This result persists even after controlling for many other descriptive variables that impact the trooper's decision to search. I then introduce an additional model that controls for race's role in the search decision and estimates the counterfactual: the change in the amount of drugs the police would find if they ignored race as a factor [*pg 1090] in the search decision. Applying that model, I find that race is the strongest predictor of identifying drug traffickers, but that racial profiling comes at significant cost, as black motorists who are subject to search are also more likely to be innocent than their white counterparts.",
author = "Barnes, {Katherine -}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1089--1141",
journal = "Duke Law Journal",
issn = "0012-7086",
publisher = "Duke University School of Law",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the counterfactual

T2 - The efficacy of drug interdiction absent racial profiling

AU - Barnes, Katherine -

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - This Article investigates the costs and benefits of racial profiling in the context of drug interdiction. I begin by reviewing the empirical economic and civil rights literature regarding the existence and rationality of racial profiling and then build an explicit model of a trooper's decision to search a stopped vehicle. Estimating the model using stop and search data from a portion of Interstate 95 in Maryland, I find that the Maryland State Police use the motorist's race as a factor in deciding which stopped vehicles to search. This result persists even after controlling for many other descriptive variables that impact the trooper's decision to search. I then introduce an additional model that controls for race's role in the search decision and estimates the counterfactual: the change in the amount of drugs the police would find if they ignored race as a factor [*pg 1090] in the search decision. Applying that model, I find that race is the strongest predictor of identifying drug traffickers, but that racial profiling comes at significant cost, as black motorists who are subject to search are also more likely to be innocent than their white counterparts.

AB - This Article investigates the costs and benefits of racial profiling in the context of drug interdiction. I begin by reviewing the empirical economic and civil rights literature regarding the existence and rationality of racial profiling and then build an explicit model of a trooper's decision to search a stopped vehicle. Estimating the model using stop and search data from a portion of Interstate 95 in Maryland, I find that the Maryland State Police use the motorist's race as a factor in deciding which stopped vehicles to search. This result persists even after controlling for many other descriptive variables that impact the trooper's decision to search. I then introduce an additional model that controls for race's role in the search decision and estimates the counterfactual: the change in the amount of drugs the police would find if they ignored race as a factor [*pg 1090] in the search decision. Applying that model, I find that race is the strongest predictor of identifying drug traffickers, but that racial profiling comes at significant cost, as black motorists who are subject to search are also more likely to be innocent than their white counterparts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747876338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747876338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33747876338

VL - 54

SP - 1089

EP - 1141

JO - Duke Law Journal

JF - Duke Law Journal

SN - 0012-7086

IS - 5

ER -