Assessing the quality of molecular divergence time estimates by fossil calibrations and fossil-based model selection

Thomas J. Near, Michael Sanderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Estimates of species divergence times using DNA sequence data are playing an increasingly important role in studies of evolution, ecology and biogeography. Most work has centred on obtaining appropriate kinds of data and developing optimal estimation procedures, whereas somewhat less attention has focused on the calibration of divergences using fossils. Case studies with multiple fossil calibration points provide important opportunities to examine the divergence time estimation problem in new ways. We discuss two cross-validation procedures that address different aspects of inference in divergence time estimation. 'Fossil cross-validation' is a procedure used to identify the impact of different individual calibrations on overall estimation. This can identify fossils that have an exceptionally large error effect and may warrant further scrutiny. 'Fossil-based model cross-validation' is an entirely different procedure that uses fossils to identify the optimal model of molecular evolution in the context of rate smoothing or other inference methods. Both procedures were applied to two recent studies: an analysis of monocot angiosperms with eight fossil calibrations and an analysis of placental mammals with nine fossil calibrations. In each case, fossil calibrations could be ranked from most to least influential, and in one of the two studies, the fossils provided decisive evidence about the optimal molecular evolutionary model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1477-1483
Number of pages7
JournalPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological sciences
Volume359
Issue number1450
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 29 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Calibration
calibration
fossils
divergence
fossil
Angiosperms
Molecular Models
Mammals
Molecular Evolution
DNA sequences
Ecology
molecular models
Liliopsida
smoothing
biogeography
angiosperm
Angiospermae
mammal
mammals
case studies

Keywords

  • Divergence time estimation
  • Fossil calibration
  • Molecular clock
  • Penalized likelihood

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{323e43dbdab543da8f9decbc052d7520,
title = "Assessing the quality of molecular divergence time estimates by fossil calibrations and fossil-based model selection",
abstract = "Estimates of species divergence times using DNA sequence data are playing an increasingly important role in studies of evolution, ecology and biogeography. Most work has centred on obtaining appropriate kinds of data and developing optimal estimation procedures, whereas somewhat less attention has focused on the calibration of divergences using fossils. Case studies with multiple fossil calibration points provide important opportunities to examine the divergence time estimation problem in new ways. We discuss two cross-validation procedures that address different aspects of inference in divergence time estimation. 'Fossil cross-validation' is a procedure used to identify the impact of different individual calibrations on overall estimation. This can identify fossils that have an exceptionally large error effect and may warrant further scrutiny. 'Fossil-based model cross-validation' is an entirely different procedure that uses fossils to identify the optimal model of molecular evolution in the context of rate smoothing or other inference methods. Both procedures were applied to two recent studies: an analysis of monocot angiosperms with eight fossil calibrations and an analysis of placental mammals with nine fossil calibrations. In each case, fossil calibrations could be ranked from most to least influential, and in one of the two studies, the fossils provided decisive evidence about the optimal molecular evolutionary model.",
keywords = "Divergence time estimation, Fossil calibration, Molecular clock, Penalized likelihood",
author = "Near, {Thomas J.} and Michael Sanderson",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "29",
doi = "10.198/rstb.2004.1523",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "359",
pages = "1477--1483",
journal = "Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1450",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the quality of molecular divergence time estimates by fossil calibrations and fossil-based model selection

AU - Near, Thomas J.

AU - Sanderson, Michael

PY - 2004/10/29

Y1 - 2004/10/29

N2 - Estimates of species divergence times using DNA sequence data are playing an increasingly important role in studies of evolution, ecology and biogeography. Most work has centred on obtaining appropriate kinds of data and developing optimal estimation procedures, whereas somewhat less attention has focused on the calibration of divergences using fossils. Case studies with multiple fossil calibration points provide important opportunities to examine the divergence time estimation problem in new ways. We discuss two cross-validation procedures that address different aspects of inference in divergence time estimation. 'Fossil cross-validation' is a procedure used to identify the impact of different individual calibrations on overall estimation. This can identify fossils that have an exceptionally large error effect and may warrant further scrutiny. 'Fossil-based model cross-validation' is an entirely different procedure that uses fossils to identify the optimal model of molecular evolution in the context of rate smoothing or other inference methods. Both procedures were applied to two recent studies: an analysis of monocot angiosperms with eight fossil calibrations and an analysis of placental mammals with nine fossil calibrations. In each case, fossil calibrations could be ranked from most to least influential, and in one of the two studies, the fossils provided decisive evidence about the optimal molecular evolutionary model.

AB - Estimates of species divergence times using DNA sequence data are playing an increasingly important role in studies of evolution, ecology and biogeography. Most work has centred on obtaining appropriate kinds of data and developing optimal estimation procedures, whereas somewhat less attention has focused on the calibration of divergences using fossils. Case studies with multiple fossil calibration points provide important opportunities to examine the divergence time estimation problem in new ways. We discuss two cross-validation procedures that address different aspects of inference in divergence time estimation. 'Fossil cross-validation' is a procedure used to identify the impact of different individual calibrations on overall estimation. This can identify fossils that have an exceptionally large error effect and may warrant further scrutiny. 'Fossil-based model cross-validation' is an entirely different procedure that uses fossils to identify the optimal model of molecular evolution in the context of rate smoothing or other inference methods. Both procedures were applied to two recent studies: an analysis of monocot angiosperms with eight fossil calibrations and an analysis of placental mammals with nine fossil calibrations. In each case, fossil calibrations could be ranked from most to least influential, and in one of the two studies, the fossils provided decisive evidence about the optimal molecular evolutionary model.

KW - Divergence time estimation

KW - Fossil calibration

KW - Molecular clock

KW - Penalized likelihood

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8144221423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8144221423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.198/rstb.2004.1523

DO - 10.198/rstb.2004.1523

M3 - Article

C2 - 15519966

AN - SCOPUS:8144221423

VL - 359

SP - 1477

EP - 1483

JO - Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological sciences

JF - Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1450

ER -