Assessing uncertainties in surface water security: An empirical multimodel approach

Dulce B B Rodrigues, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, Eduardo M. Mendiondo, Paulo Tarso S Oliveira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various uncertainties are involved in the representation of processes that characterize interactions among societal needs, ecosystem functioning, and hydrological conditions. Here we develop an empirical uncertainty assessment of water security indicators that characterize scarcity and vulnerability, based on a multimodel and resampling framework. We consider several uncertainty sources including those related to (i) observed streamflow data; (ii) hydrological model structure; (iii) residual analysis; (iv) the method for defining Environmental Flow Requirement; (v) the definition of critical conditions for water provision; and (vi) the critical demand imposed by human activities. We estimate the overall hydrological model uncertainty by means of a residual bootstrap resampling approach, and by uncertainty propagation through different methodological arrangements applied to a 291 km2 agricultural basin within the Cantareira water supply system in Brazil. Together, the two-component hydrograph residual analysis and the block bootstrap resampling approach result in a more accurate and precise estimate of the uncertainty (95% confidence intervals) in the simulated time series. We then compare the uncertainty estimates associated with water security indicators using a multimodel framework and the uncertainty estimates provided by each model uncertainty estimation approach. The range of values obtained for the water security indicators suggests that the models/methods are robust and performs well in a range of plausible situations. The method is general and can be easily extended, thereby forming the basis for meaningful support to end-users facing water resource challenges by enabling them to incorporate a viable uncertainty analysis into a robust decision-making process. Key Points: Uncertainty analysis of scarcity and vulnerability indicators This multimodel/resampling-based framework includes several uncertainty sources Viable uncertainty analysis to be included into a robust decision-making process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9013-9028
Number of pages16
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

uncertainty analysis
surface water
vulnerability
decision making
water
hydrograph
confidence interval
streamflow
human activity
water supply
water resource
time series
indicator
ecosystem
basin
method
analysis

Keywords

  • bootstrapping
  • Environmental Flow Requirements
  • overall model uncertainty
  • robust decision making
  • water scarcity and vulnerability indicators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Assessing uncertainties in surface water security : An empirical multimodel approach. / Rodrigues, Dulce B B; Gupta, Hoshin Vijai; Mendiondo, Eduardo M.; Oliveira, Paulo Tarso S.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 9013-9028.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rodrigues, Dulce B B ; Gupta, Hoshin Vijai ; Mendiondo, Eduardo M. ; Oliveira, Paulo Tarso S. / Assessing uncertainties in surface water security : An empirical multimodel approach. In: Water Resources Research. 2015 ; Vol. 51, No. 11. pp. 9013-9028.
@article{c24009f73ee249cd9523a98be6175a5d,
title = "Assessing uncertainties in surface water security: An empirical multimodel approach",
abstract = "Various uncertainties are involved in the representation of processes that characterize interactions among societal needs, ecosystem functioning, and hydrological conditions. Here we develop an empirical uncertainty assessment of water security indicators that characterize scarcity and vulnerability, based on a multimodel and resampling framework. We consider several uncertainty sources including those related to (i) observed streamflow data; (ii) hydrological model structure; (iii) residual analysis; (iv) the method for defining Environmental Flow Requirement; (v) the definition of critical conditions for water provision; and (vi) the critical demand imposed by human activities. We estimate the overall hydrological model uncertainty by means of a residual bootstrap resampling approach, and by uncertainty propagation through different methodological arrangements applied to a 291 km2 agricultural basin within the Cantareira water supply system in Brazil. Together, the two-component hydrograph residual analysis and the block bootstrap resampling approach result in a more accurate and precise estimate of the uncertainty (95{\%} confidence intervals) in the simulated time series. We then compare the uncertainty estimates associated with water security indicators using a multimodel framework and the uncertainty estimates provided by each model uncertainty estimation approach. The range of values obtained for the water security indicators suggests that the models/methods are robust and performs well in a range of plausible situations. The method is general and can be easily extended, thereby forming the basis for meaningful support to end-users facing water resource challenges by enabling them to incorporate a viable uncertainty analysis into a robust decision-making process. Key Points: Uncertainty analysis of scarcity and vulnerability indicators This multimodel/resampling-based framework includes several uncertainty sources Viable uncertainty analysis to be included into a robust decision-making process.",
keywords = "bootstrapping, Environmental Flow Requirements, overall model uncertainty, robust decision making, water scarcity and vulnerability indicators",
author = "Rodrigues, {Dulce B B} and Gupta, {Hoshin Vijai} and Mendiondo, {Eduardo M.} and Oliveira, {Paulo Tarso S}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/2014WR016691",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "9013--9028",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing uncertainties in surface water security

T2 - An empirical multimodel approach

AU - Rodrigues, Dulce B B

AU - Gupta, Hoshin Vijai

AU - Mendiondo, Eduardo M.

AU - Oliveira, Paulo Tarso S

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Various uncertainties are involved in the representation of processes that characterize interactions among societal needs, ecosystem functioning, and hydrological conditions. Here we develop an empirical uncertainty assessment of water security indicators that characterize scarcity and vulnerability, based on a multimodel and resampling framework. We consider several uncertainty sources including those related to (i) observed streamflow data; (ii) hydrological model structure; (iii) residual analysis; (iv) the method for defining Environmental Flow Requirement; (v) the definition of critical conditions for water provision; and (vi) the critical demand imposed by human activities. We estimate the overall hydrological model uncertainty by means of a residual bootstrap resampling approach, and by uncertainty propagation through different methodological arrangements applied to a 291 km2 agricultural basin within the Cantareira water supply system in Brazil. Together, the two-component hydrograph residual analysis and the block bootstrap resampling approach result in a more accurate and precise estimate of the uncertainty (95% confidence intervals) in the simulated time series. We then compare the uncertainty estimates associated with water security indicators using a multimodel framework and the uncertainty estimates provided by each model uncertainty estimation approach. The range of values obtained for the water security indicators suggests that the models/methods are robust and performs well in a range of plausible situations. The method is general and can be easily extended, thereby forming the basis for meaningful support to end-users facing water resource challenges by enabling them to incorporate a viable uncertainty analysis into a robust decision-making process. Key Points: Uncertainty analysis of scarcity and vulnerability indicators This multimodel/resampling-based framework includes several uncertainty sources Viable uncertainty analysis to be included into a robust decision-making process.

AB - Various uncertainties are involved in the representation of processes that characterize interactions among societal needs, ecosystem functioning, and hydrological conditions. Here we develop an empirical uncertainty assessment of water security indicators that characterize scarcity and vulnerability, based on a multimodel and resampling framework. We consider several uncertainty sources including those related to (i) observed streamflow data; (ii) hydrological model structure; (iii) residual analysis; (iv) the method for defining Environmental Flow Requirement; (v) the definition of critical conditions for water provision; and (vi) the critical demand imposed by human activities. We estimate the overall hydrological model uncertainty by means of a residual bootstrap resampling approach, and by uncertainty propagation through different methodological arrangements applied to a 291 km2 agricultural basin within the Cantareira water supply system in Brazil. Together, the two-component hydrograph residual analysis and the block bootstrap resampling approach result in a more accurate and precise estimate of the uncertainty (95% confidence intervals) in the simulated time series. We then compare the uncertainty estimates associated with water security indicators using a multimodel framework and the uncertainty estimates provided by each model uncertainty estimation approach. The range of values obtained for the water security indicators suggests that the models/methods are robust and performs well in a range of plausible situations. The method is general and can be easily extended, thereby forming the basis for meaningful support to end-users facing water resource challenges by enabling them to incorporate a viable uncertainty analysis into a robust decision-making process. Key Points: Uncertainty analysis of scarcity and vulnerability indicators This multimodel/resampling-based framework includes several uncertainty sources Viable uncertainty analysis to be included into a robust decision-making process.

KW - bootstrapping

KW - Environmental Flow Requirements

KW - overall model uncertainty

KW - robust decision making

KW - water scarcity and vulnerability indicators

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956789526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956789526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2014WR016691

DO - 10.1002/2014WR016691

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956789526

VL - 51

SP - 9013

EP - 9028

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 11

ER -