Assessment of alternative draw solutions for optimized performance of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine

Kerri L. Hickenbottom, Johan Vanneste, Tzahi Y. Cath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Osmotic power harnesses the energy of mixing between high and low salinity streams. The osmotic heat engine (OHE) is a closed-loop, membrane-based power generation cycle that couples pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), an osmotically driven membrane process, with a thermal separation process. In this investigation, membrane distillation (MD), a thermally driven membrane process, was used. High power density in PRO is essential to minimize equipment costs and parasitic pumping losses. Likewise, high water flux is needed in MD to efficiently reconcentrate the diluted draw solution from the PRO process and minimize equipment costs. In this study, several ionic organic and inorganic draw solutions were evaluated as working fluids in the OHE. Their performance was assessed in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and MD water flux and thermal efficiency. Potential pore wetting of the MD membrane was also evaluated. The working fluids were also assessed in terms of their potential for equipment corrosion. Results indicate that sodium formate and CaCl2 outperform NaCl (commonly used PRO draw solution) in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and that LiCl and CaCl2 outperform NaCl in terms of MD water flux. Furthermore, there were no signs of MD membrane wetting, even at high feed concentrations. Results were used to perform an economic analysis and make future recommendations on the most suitable working fluid for the OHE. Of the select salts, CaCl2, MgCl2, sodium propionate, and LiCl resulted in the lowest OHE electricity generation costs and had the lowest potential for corrosion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-175
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Membrane Science
Volume504
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

heat engines
Heat engines
Hot Temperature
Osmosis
membranes
Membranes
Distillation
osmosis
distillation
Pressure
working fluids
radiant flux density
formic acid
Corrosion
Fluxes
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
wetting
Fluids

Keywords

  • Draw solutions
  • Energy-water nexus
  • Membrane distillation
  • Osmotic power
  • Pressure retarded osmosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Assessment of alternative draw solutions for optimized performance of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine. / Hickenbottom, Kerri L.; Vanneste, Johan; Cath, Tzahi Y.

In: Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 504, 15.04.2016, p. 162-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb413fea476a4aaeb6448e7eff5ff080,
title = "Assessment of alternative draw solutions for optimized performance of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine",
abstract = "Osmotic power harnesses the energy of mixing between high and low salinity streams. The osmotic heat engine (OHE) is a closed-loop, membrane-based power generation cycle that couples pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), an osmotically driven membrane process, with a thermal separation process. In this investigation, membrane distillation (MD), a thermally driven membrane process, was used. High power density in PRO is essential to minimize equipment costs and parasitic pumping losses. Likewise, high water flux is needed in MD to efficiently reconcentrate the diluted draw solution from the PRO process and minimize equipment costs. In this study, several ionic organic and inorganic draw solutions were evaluated as working fluids in the OHE. Their performance was assessed in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and MD water flux and thermal efficiency. Potential pore wetting of the MD membrane was also evaluated. The working fluids were also assessed in terms of their potential for equipment corrosion. Results indicate that sodium formate and CaCl2 outperform NaCl (commonly used PRO draw solution) in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and that LiCl and CaCl2 outperform NaCl in terms of MD water flux. Furthermore, there were no signs of MD membrane wetting, even at high feed concentrations. Results were used to perform an economic analysis and make future recommendations on the most suitable working fluid for the OHE. Of the select salts, CaCl2, MgCl2, sodium propionate, and LiCl resulted in the lowest OHE electricity generation costs and had the lowest potential for corrosion.",
keywords = "Draw solutions, Energy-water nexus, Membrane distillation, Osmotic power, Pressure retarded osmosis",
author = "Hickenbottom, {Kerri L.} and Johan Vanneste and Cath, {Tzahi Y.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "504",
pages = "162--175",
journal = "Jornal of Membrane Science",
issn = "0376-7388",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of alternative draw solutions for optimized performance of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine

AU - Hickenbottom, Kerri L.

AU - Vanneste, Johan

AU - Cath, Tzahi Y.

PY - 2016/4/15

Y1 - 2016/4/15

N2 - Osmotic power harnesses the energy of mixing between high and low salinity streams. The osmotic heat engine (OHE) is a closed-loop, membrane-based power generation cycle that couples pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), an osmotically driven membrane process, with a thermal separation process. In this investigation, membrane distillation (MD), a thermally driven membrane process, was used. High power density in PRO is essential to minimize equipment costs and parasitic pumping losses. Likewise, high water flux is needed in MD to efficiently reconcentrate the diluted draw solution from the PRO process and minimize equipment costs. In this study, several ionic organic and inorganic draw solutions were evaluated as working fluids in the OHE. Their performance was assessed in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and MD water flux and thermal efficiency. Potential pore wetting of the MD membrane was also evaluated. The working fluids were also assessed in terms of their potential for equipment corrosion. Results indicate that sodium formate and CaCl2 outperform NaCl (commonly used PRO draw solution) in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and that LiCl and CaCl2 outperform NaCl in terms of MD water flux. Furthermore, there were no signs of MD membrane wetting, even at high feed concentrations. Results were used to perform an economic analysis and make future recommendations on the most suitable working fluid for the OHE. Of the select salts, CaCl2, MgCl2, sodium propionate, and LiCl resulted in the lowest OHE electricity generation costs and had the lowest potential for corrosion.

AB - Osmotic power harnesses the energy of mixing between high and low salinity streams. The osmotic heat engine (OHE) is a closed-loop, membrane-based power generation cycle that couples pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), an osmotically driven membrane process, with a thermal separation process. In this investigation, membrane distillation (MD), a thermally driven membrane process, was used. High power density in PRO is essential to minimize equipment costs and parasitic pumping losses. Likewise, high water flux is needed in MD to efficiently reconcentrate the diluted draw solution from the PRO process and minimize equipment costs. In this study, several ionic organic and inorganic draw solutions were evaluated as working fluids in the OHE. Their performance was assessed in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and MD water flux and thermal efficiency. Potential pore wetting of the MD membrane was also evaluated. The working fluids were also assessed in terms of their potential for equipment corrosion. Results indicate that sodium formate and CaCl2 outperform NaCl (commonly used PRO draw solution) in terms of PRO power density and reverse solute diffusion, and that LiCl and CaCl2 outperform NaCl in terms of MD water flux. Furthermore, there were no signs of MD membrane wetting, even at high feed concentrations. Results were used to perform an economic analysis and make future recommendations on the most suitable working fluid for the OHE. Of the select salts, CaCl2, MgCl2, sodium propionate, and LiCl resulted in the lowest OHE electricity generation costs and had the lowest potential for corrosion.

KW - Draw solutions

KW - Energy-water nexus

KW - Membrane distillation

KW - Osmotic power

KW - Pressure retarded osmosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955512943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955512943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84955512943

VL - 504

SP - 162

EP - 175

JO - Jornal of Membrane Science

JF - Jornal of Membrane Science

SN - 0376-7388

ER -