Assessment of CMIP5 model simulations of the North American monsoon system

Kerrie L. Geil, Yolande Serra, Xubin Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Precipitation, geopotential height, and wind fields from 21 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) are examined to determine how well this generation of general circulation models represents the North American monsoon system (NAMS). Results show no improvement since CMIP3 in the magnitude (root-mean-square error and bias) of the mean annual cycle of monthly precipitation over a core monsoon domain, but improvement in the phasing of the seasonal cycle in precipitation is notable. Monsoon onset is early for most models but is clearly visible in daily climatological precipitation, whereas monsoon retreat is highly variable and unclear in daily climatological precipitation. Models that best capture large-scale circulation patterns at a low level usually have realistic representations of the NAMS, but even the best models poorly represent monsoon retreat. Difficulty in reproducing monsoon retreat results from an inaccurate representation of gradients in low-level geopotential height across the larger region, which causes an unrealistic flux of low-level moisture from the tropics into the NAMS region that extends well into the postmonsoon season. Composites of the models with the best and worst representations of the NAMS indicate that adequate representation of the monsoon during the early to midseason can be achieved even with a large-scale circulation pattern bias, as long as the bias is spatially consistent over the larger region influencing monsoon development; in other words, as with monsoon retreat, it is the inaccuracy of the spatial gradients in geopotential height across the larger region that prevents some models from realistic representation of the early and midseason monsoon system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8787-8801
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume26
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

monsoon
simulation
geopotential
CMIP
wind field
annual cycle
general circulation model
moisture

Keywords

  • General circulation models
  • Model comparison
  • Model evaluation/performance
  • Monsoons
  • Rainfall
  • Seasonal cycle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Assessment of CMIP5 model simulations of the North American monsoon system. / Geil, Kerrie L.; Serra, Yolande; Zeng, Xubin.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, No. 22, 11.2013, p. 8787-8801.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{277be7ad37a44ce0a97f690ebcce93ba,
title = "Assessment of CMIP5 model simulations of the North American monsoon system",
abstract = "Precipitation, geopotential height, and wind fields from 21 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) are examined to determine how well this generation of general circulation models represents the North American monsoon system (NAMS). Results show no improvement since CMIP3 in the magnitude (root-mean-square error and bias) of the mean annual cycle of monthly precipitation over a core monsoon domain, but improvement in the phasing of the seasonal cycle in precipitation is notable. Monsoon onset is early for most models but is clearly visible in daily climatological precipitation, whereas monsoon retreat is highly variable and unclear in daily climatological precipitation. Models that best capture large-scale circulation patterns at a low level usually have realistic representations of the NAMS, but even the best models poorly represent monsoon retreat. Difficulty in reproducing monsoon retreat results from an inaccurate representation of gradients in low-level geopotential height across the larger region, which causes an unrealistic flux of low-level moisture from the tropics into the NAMS region that extends well into the postmonsoon season. Composites of the models with the best and worst representations of the NAMS indicate that adequate representation of the monsoon during the early to midseason can be achieved even with a large-scale circulation pattern bias, as long as the bias is spatially consistent over the larger region influencing monsoon development; in other words, as with monsoon retreat, it is the inaccuracy of the spatial gradients in geopotential height across the larger region that prevents some models from realistic representation of the early and midseason monsoon system.",
keywords = "General circulation models, Model comparison, Model evaluation/performance, Monsoons, Rainfall, Seasonal cycle",
author = "Geil, {Kerrie L.} and Yolande Serra and Xubin Zeng",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00044.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "8787--8801",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of CMIP5 model simulations of the North American monsoon system

AU - Geil, Kerrie L.

AU - Serra, Yolande

AU - Zeng, Xubin

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Precipitation, geopotential height, and wind fields from 21 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) are examined to determine how well this generation of general circulation models represents the North American monsoon system (NAMS). Results show no improvement since CMIP3 in the magnitude (root-mean-square error and bias) of the mean annual cycle of monthly precipitation over a core monsoon domain, but improvement in the phasing of the seasonal cycle in precipitation is notable. Monsoon onset is early for most models but is clearly visible in daily climatological precipitation, whereas monsoon retreat is highly variable and unclear in daily climatological precipitation. Models that best capture large-scale circulation patterns at a low level usually have realistic representations of the NAMS, but even the best models poorly represent monsoon retreat. Difficulty in reproducing monsoon retreat results from an inaccurate representation of gradients in low-level geopotential height across the larger region, which causes an unrealistic flux of low-level moisture from the tropics into the NAMS region that extends well into the postmonsoon season. Composites of the models with the best and worst representations of the NAMS indicate that adequate representation of the monsoon during the early to midseason can be achieved even with a large-scale circulation pattern bias, as long as the bias is spatially consistent over the larger region influencing monsoon development; in other words, as with monsoon retreat, it is the inaccuracy of the spatial gradients in geopotential height across the larger region that prevents some models from realistic representation of the early and midseason monsoon system.

AB - Precipitation, geopotential height, and wind fields from 21 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) are examined to determine how well this generation of general circulation models represents the North American monsoon system (NAMS). Results show no improvement since CMIP3 in the magnitude (root-mean-square error and bias) of the mean annual cycle of monthly precipitation over a core monsoon domain, but improvement in the phasing of the seasonal cycle in precipitation is notable. Monsoon onset is early for most models but is clearly visible in daily climatological precipitation, whereas monsoon retreat is highly variable and unclear in daily climatological precipitation. Models that best capture large-scale circulation patterns at a low level usually have realistic representations of the NAMS, but even the best models poorly represent monsoon retreat. Difficulty in reproducing monsoon retreat results from an inaccurate representation of gradients in low-level geopotential height across the larger region, which causes an unrealistic flux of low-level moisture from the tropics into the NAMS region that extends well into the postmonsoon season. Composites of the models with the best and worst representations of the NAMS indicate that adequate representation of the monsoon during the early to midseason can be achieved even with a large-scale circulation pattern bias, as long as the bias is spatially consistent over the larger region influencing monsoon development; in other words, as with monsoon retreat, it is the inaccuracy of the spatial gradients in geopotential height across the larger region that prevents some models from realistic representation of the early and midseason monsoon system.

KW - General circulation models

KW - Model comparison

KW - Model evaluation/performance

KW - Monsoons

KW - Rainfall

KW - Seasonal cycle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888043645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888043645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00044.1

DO - 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00044.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84888043645

VL - 26

SP - 8787

EP - 8801

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 22

ER -