### Abstract

The paper deals with the issue of assessing approximate models used for the treatment of radiation coupled with hydrodynamics equations. Radiation plays a key role in many astrophysical structures, such as accretion shocks on classical T Tauri stars, but also in experimental flows, such as plasmas generated in laser driven radiative shocks. It is therefore crucial to test the accuracy of the approximate radiation moment models used in radiation hydrodynamics (RHD) calculations. Based on a laboratory shock simulation test case, we present comparisons of approximate radiation quantities calculated with the gray M_{1} model with the three-dimensional (3D) RHD code HERACLES, and reference radiation quantities obtained after solving the radiative transfer equation with the 3D radiative transfer code IRIS by post-processing a HERACLES structure. Our results indicate that radiation quantities are correctly calculated by M_{1} in regions of the computational domain far from lateral boundaries, from which photons can freely escape, and through which no photon can enter from the outside. However, M_{1} fails to reproduce correct quantities in the vicinity of these boundaries. We suggest to implement an improved version of the M_{1} model: a half-moment model that makes it possible to distinguish between incoming flux and outgoing flux at boundaries.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 98-105 |

Number of pages | 8 |

Journal | High Energy Density Physics |

Volume | 17 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Dec 1 2015 |

### Keywords

- Laser generated shocks
- Radiation hydrodynamics
- Radiative transfer

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Radiation

## Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of the gray M<sub>1</sub> model in the case of a laboratory radiative shock simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

## Cite this

_{1}model in the case of a laboratory radiative shock simulation.

*High Energy Density Physics*,

*17*, 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hedp.2014.10.006