Asthma Symptom Utility Index: Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference in adult asthmatic patients

Christian Bime, Christine Y. Wei, Janet T. Holbrook, Marianna M. Sockrider, Dennis A. Revicki, Robert A. Wise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of asthma symptoms is a core outcome measure in asthma clinical research. The Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) was developed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms. The psychometric properties of the ASUI are not well characterized, and a minimal important difference (MID) is not established. Objectives: We assessed the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the ASUI in a population of adult asthmatic patients. We also sought to determine the MID for the ASUI. Methods: Adult asthmatic patients (n = 1648) from 2 previously completed multicenter randomized trials were included. Demographic information, spirometric results, ASUI scores, and other asthma questionnaire scores were obtained at baseline and during follow-up visits. Participants also kept a daily asthma diary. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the ASUI was 0.74 (Cronbach α). Test-retest reliability was 0.76 (intraclass correlation). Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between ASUI scores and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (Spearman correlation r = -0.79; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.75; P < .001) and Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores (r = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.61; P < .001). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated, with significant differences between mean changes in ASUI scores across groups of participants differing by 10% in percent predicted FEV 1 (P < .001) and by 0.5 points in Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (P < .001). Anchor-based and statistical methods support an MID for the ASUI of 0.09 points. Conclusions: The ASUI is reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time. The MID of the ASUI (range of scores, 0-1) is 0.09.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1078-1084
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume130
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Asthma
Symptom Assessment
Psychometrics

Keywords

  • Asthma Symptom Utility Index
  • minimal important difference
  • reliability
  • responsiveness
  • validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

Asthma Symptom Utility Index : Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference in adult asthmatic patients. / Bime, Christian; Wei, Christine Y.; Holbrook, Janet T.; Sockrider, Marianna M.; Revicki, Dennis A.; Wise, Robert A.

In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 130, No. 5, 11.2012, p. 1078-1084.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bime, Christian ; Wei, Christine Y. ; Holbrook, Janet T. ; Sockrider, Marianna M. ; Revicki, Dennis A. ; Wise, Robert A. / Asthma Symptom Utility Index : Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference in adult asthmatic patients. In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2012 ; Vol. 130, No. 5. pp. 1078-1084.
@article{000dd3cd97fc4dd7b91008b56cba1d38,
title = "Asthma Symptom Utility Index: Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference in adult asthmatic patients",
abstract = "Background: The evaluation of asthma symptoms is a core outcome measure in asthma clinical research. The Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) was developed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms. The psychometric properties of the ASUI are not well characterized, and a minimal important difference (MID) is not established. Objectives: We assessed the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the ASUI in a population of adult asthmatic patients. We also sought to determine the MID for the ASUI. Methods: Adult asthmatic patients (n = 1648) from 2 previously completed multicenter randomized trials were included. Demographic information, spirometric results, ASUI scores, and other asthma questionnaire scores were obtained at baseline and during follow-up visits. Participants also kept a daily asthma diary. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the ASUI was 0.74 (Cronbach α). Test-retest reliability was 0.76 (intraclass correlation). Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between ASUI scores and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (Spearman correlation r = -0.79; 95{\%} CI, -0.85 to -0.75; P < .001) and Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores (r = 0.59; 95{\%} CI, 0.51-0.61; P < .001). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated, with significant differences between mean changes in ASUI scores across groups of participants differing by 10{\%} in percent predicted FEV 1 (P < .001) and by 0.5 points in Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (P < .001). Anchor-based and statistical methods support an MID for the ASUI of 0.09 points. Conclusions: The ASUI is reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time. The MID of the ASUI (range of scores, 0-1) is 0.09.",
keywords = "Asthma Symptom Utility Index, minimal important difference, reliability, responsiveness, validity",
author = "Christian Bime and Wei, {Christine Y.} and Holbrook, {Janet T.} and Sockrider, {Marianna M.} and Revicki, {Dennis A.} and Wise, {Robert A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "1078--1084",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "0091-6749",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asthma Symptom Utility Index

T2 - Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference in adult asthmatic patients

AU - Bime, Christian

AU - Wei, Christine Y.

AU - Holbrook, Janet T.

AU - Sockrider, Marianna M.

AU - Revicki, Dennis A.

AU - Wise, Robert A.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Background: The evaluation of asthma symptoms is a core outcome measure in asthma clinical research. The Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) was developed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms. The psychometric properties of the ASUI are not well characterized, and a minimal important difference (MID) is not established. Objectives: We assessed the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the ASUI in a population of adult asthmatic patients. We also sought to determine the MID for the ASUI. Methods: Adult asthmatic patients (n = 1648) from 2 previously completed multicenter randomized trials were included. Demographic information, spirometric results, ASUI scores, and other asthma questionnaire scores were obtained at baseline and during follow-up visits. Participants also kept a daily asthma diary. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the ASUI was 0.74 (Cronbach α). Test-retest reliability was 0.76 (intraclass correlation). Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between ASUI scores and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (Spearman correlation r = -0.79; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.75; P < .001) and Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores (r = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.61; P < .001). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated, with significant differences between mean changes in ASUI scores across groups of participants differing by 10% in percent predicted FEV 1 (P < .001) and by 0.5 points in Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (P < .001). Anchor-based and statistical methods support an MID for the ASUI of 0.09 points. Conclusions: The ASUI is reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time. The MID of the ASUI (range of scores, 0-1) is 0.09.

AB - Background: The evaluation of asthma symptoms is a core outcome measure in asthma clinical research. The Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) was developed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms. The psychometric properties of the ASUI are not well characterized, and a minimal important difference (MID) is not established. Objectives: We assessed the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the ASUI in a population of adult asthmatic patients. We also sought to determine the MID for the ASUI. Methods: Adult asthmatic patients (n = 1648) from 2 previously completed multicenter randomized trials were included. Demographic information, spirometric results, ASUI scores, and other asthma questionnaire scores were obtained at baseline and during follow-up visits. Participants also kept a daily asthma diary. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the ASUI was 0.74 (Cronbach α). Test-retest reliability was 0.76 (intraclass correlation). Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between ASUI scores and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (Spearman correlation r = -0.79; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.75; P < .001) and Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores (r = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.61; P < .001). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated, with significant differences between mean changes in ASUI scores across groups of participants differing by 10% in percent predicted FEV 1 (P < .001) and by 0.5 points in Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (P < .001). Anchor-based and statistical methods support an MID for the ASUI of 0.09 points. Conclusions: The ASUI is reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time. The MID of the ASUI (range of scores, 0-1) is 0.09.

KW - Asthma Symptom Utility Index

KW - minimal important difference

KW - reliability

KW - responsiveness

KW - validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869140375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869140375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.058

DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.058

M3 - Article

C2 - 23026499

AN - SCOPUS:84869140375

VL - 130

SP - 1078

EP - 1084

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 0091-6749

IS - 5

ER -