Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures

John R. Hollenbeck, Aleksander P J Ellis, Stephen E. Humphrey, Adela S. Garza, Daniel R. Ilgen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tested predictions derived from Structural Adaptation Theory (SAT) on the longitudinal effects of centralizing and decentralizing decision-making structures in teams. Results from 93 four-person teams working on a command and control simulation generally supported SAT, documenting that it was more difficult for teams to adapt to a centralized decision-making structure after formerly working within a decentralized structure, than it was to adapt in the alternative direction. The negative effects of centralized shifts were mediated by efficiency and adaptability, in the sense that former decentralized teams experienced the negative aspects of centralization (lack of adaptability), but not the positive aspects (efficiency). The dangers of employing structural reconfiguration to solve certain problems in teams are discussed, especially if these changes are based upon expectations generalized from cross-sectional research that did not directly observe teams that experienced true structural change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-74
Number of pages11
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Research
Asymmetry
Team decision making
Direction compound
Decision making
Adaptability

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Structure
  • Teams

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Asymmetry in structural adaptation : The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures. / Hollenbeck, John R.; Ellis, Aleksander P J; Humphrey, Stephen E.; Garza, Adela S.; Ilgen, Daniel R.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 114, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 64-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{025f4c81ee6e4c0b8e6039ca1244a185,
title = "Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures",
abstract = "This study tested predictions derived from Structural Adaptation Theory (SAT) on the longitudinal effects of centralizing and decentralizing decision-making structures in teams. Results from 93 four-person teams working on a command and control simulation generally supported SAT, documenting that it was more difficult for teams to adapt to a centralized decision-making structure after formerly working within a decentralized structure, than it was to adapt in the alternative direction. The negative effects of centralized shifts were mediated by efficiency and adaptability, in the sense that former decentralized teams experienced the negative aspects of centralization (lack of adaptability), but not the positive aspects (efficiency). The dangers of employing structural reconfiguration to solve certain problems in teams are discussed, especially if these changes are based upon expectations generalized from cross-sectional research that did not directly observe teams that experienced true structural change.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Structure, Teams",
author = "Hollenbeck, {John R.} and Ellis, {Aleksander P J} and Humphrey, {Stephen E.} and Garza, {Adela S.} and Ilgen, {Daniel R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "64--74",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asymmetry in structural adaptation

T2 - The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures

AU - Hollenbeck, John R.

AU - Ellis, Aleksander P J

AU - Humphrey, Stephen E.

AU - Garza, Adela S.

AU - Ilgen, Daniel R.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - This study tested predictions derived from Structural Adaptation Theory (SAT) on the longitudinal effects of centralizing and decentralizing decision-making structures in teams. Results from 93 four-person teams working on a command and control simulation generally supported SAT, documenting that it was more difficult for teams to adapt to a centralized decision-making structure after formerly working within a decentralized structure, than it was to adapt in the alternative direction. The negative effects of centralized shifts were mediated by efficiency and adaptability, in the sense that former decentralized teams experienced the negative aspects of centralization (lack of adaptability), but not the positive aspects (efficiency). The dangers of employing structural reconfiguration to solve certain problems in teams are discussed, especially if these changes are based upon expectations generalized from cross-sectional research that did not directly observe teams that experienced true structural change.

AB - This study tested predictions derived from Structural Adaptation Theory (SAT) on the longitudinal effects of centralizing and decentralizing decision-making structures in teams. Results from 93 four-person teams working on a command and control simulation generally supported SAT, documenting that it was more difficult for teams to adapt to a centralized decision-making structure after formerly working within a decentralized structure, than it was to adapt in the alternative direction. The negative effects of centralized shifts were mediated by efficiency and adaptability, in the sense that former decentralized teams experienced the negative aspects of centralization (lack of adaptability), but not the positive aspects (efficiency). The dangers of employing structural reconfiguration to solve certain problems in teams are discussed, especially if these changes are based upon expectations generalized from cross-sectional research that did not directly observe teams that experienced true structural change.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Structure

KW - Teams

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449307670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449307670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78449307670

VL - 114

SP - 64

EP - 74

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -