Attention is biased to near surfaces

Greg L. West, Jay Pratt, Mary A Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is thought that attention is allocated to figural items over adjacent ground stimuli. It is unclear which attribute of figures drives any previously observed attentional effects (e.g., nearness or shapedness). Moreover, it is unclear whether previous attentional effects are automatic or strategy driven. In the present series of experiments, we tested whether attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces under condition where near/far was not confounded with shaped/shapelessness. Using a temporal order judgment paradigm, in the first experiment, we showed that attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces. Furthermore, by using the stimuli themselves as the temporal order probe in Experiment 2, we found that this effect is independent of previous attentional allocation across the visual field. A third experiment ruled out the possibility that lateral inhibition by the pretarget backdrop was responsible for attentional bias toward near surfaces. Overall, our results converge to show that near surfaces attract attention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1213-1220
Number of pages8
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Visual Fields
Attentional Bias
Experiment
Drive
Inhibition (Psychology)
Stimulus
Visual Field
Paradigm
Temporal Order Judgment

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Attention capture
  • Object-based attention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Attention is biased to near surfaces. / West, Greg L.; Pratt, Jay; Peterson, Mary A.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 20, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 1213-1220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

West, Greg L. ; Pratt, Jay ; Peterson, Mary A. / Attention is biased to near surfaces. In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 1213-1220.
@article{0b4ecac4dd22479c82ebe033d04988ba,
title = "Attention is biased to near surfaces",
abstract = "It is thought that attention is allocated to figural items over adjacent ground stimuli. It is unclear which attribute of figures drives any previously observed attentional effects (e.g., nearness or shapedness). Moreover, it is unclear whether previous attentional effects are automatic or strategy driven. In the present series of experiments, we tested whether attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces under condition where near/far was not confounded with shaped/shapelessness. Using a temporal order judgment paradigm, in the first experiment, we showed that attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces. Furthermore, by using the stimuli themselves as the temporal order probe in Experiment 2, we found that this effect is independent of previous attentional allocation across the visual field. A third experiment ruled out the possibility that lateral inhibition by the pretarget backdrop was responsible for attentional bias toward near surfaces. Overall, our results converge to show that near surfaces attract attention.",
keywords = "Attention, Attention capture, Object-based attention",
author = "West, {Greg L.} and Jay Pratt and Peterson, {Mary A}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.3758/s13423-013-0455-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1213--1220",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention is biased to near surfaces

AU - West, Greg L.

AU - Pratt, Jay

AU - Peterson, Mary A

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - It is thought that attention is allocated to figural items over adjacent ground stimuli. It is unclear which attribute of figures drives any previously observed attentional effects (e.g., nearness or shapedness). Moreover, it is unclear whether previous attentional effects are automatic or strategy driven. In the present series of experiments, we tested whether attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces under condition where near/far was not confounded with shaped/shapelessness. Using a temporal order judgment paradigm, in the first experiment, we showed that attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces. Furthermore, by using the stimuli themselves as the temporal order probe in Experiment 2, we found that this effect is independent of previous attentional allocation across the visual field. A third experiment ruled out the possibility that lateral inhibition by the pretarget backdrop was responsible for attentional bias toward near surfaces. Overall, our results converge to show that near surfaces attract attention.

AB - It is thought that attention is allocated to figural items over adjacent ground stimuli. It is unclear which attribute of figures drives any previously observed attentional effects (e.g., nearness or shapedness). Moreover, it is unclear whether previous attentional effects are automatic or strategy driven. In the present series of experiments, we tested whether attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces under condition where near/far was not confounded with shaped/shapelessness. Using a temporal order judgment paradigm, in the first experiment, we showed that attention is allocated to the nearer of two surfaces. Furthermore, by using the stimuli themselves as the temporal order probe in Experiment 2, we found that this effect is independent of previous attentional allocation across the visual field. A third experiment ruled out the possibility that lateral inhibition by the pretarget backdrop was responsible for attentional bias toward near surfaces. Overall, our results converge to show that near surfaces attract attention.

KW - Attention

KW - Attention capture

KW - Object-based attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889564394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889564394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13423-013-0455-7

DO - 10.3758/s13423-013-0455-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 23896744

AN - SCOPUS:84889564394

VL - 20

SP - 1213

EP - 1220

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 6

ER -