Attenuation of Lung Reperfusion Injury by Modified Ventilation and Reperfusion Techniques

R. Ramesh Singh, Victor E. Laubach, Peter I. Ellman, T. Brett Reece, Eric Unger, Irving L. Kron, Curtis G. Tribble

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: High ventilation and perfusion pressures after lung transplantation may have deleterious effects. We hypothesized that using combined protective approaches for ventilation and perfusion would be optimal for reducing injury and improving function after ischemia-reperfusion. Methods: Using an isolated, blood-perfused, rabbit lung model, lungs underwent 120 minutes of reperfusion either immediately (Sham) or after 18 hours of cold ischemia (IR). Groups Sham-P and IR-P underwent protective ventilation and reperfusion, and Groups Sham-C and IR-C underwent conventional ventilation and reperfusion. Protective ventilation involved gradually increasing the flow rate during 5 minutes to 1.8 liters/min, and conventional ventilation entailed immediate initiation of flow at 1.8 liters/min. Protective reperfusion involved gradually increasing perfusion during 5 minutes to 60 ml/min, and conventional reperfusion entailed immediate perfusion at 60 ml/min. Two other groups underwent either protective ventilation with conventional perfusion or vice versa. Airway pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and arterial blood gases were measured throughout reperfusion. Wet/dry weight, highest oxygenation index, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) protein were also measured. Results: Protective ventilation and perfusion after ischemia (IR-P) resulted in significant improvements in lung function as measured by increased Po2 and decreased Pco2, airway pressure, and highest oxygenation index compared with conventional reperfusion (IR-C). Injury was significantly reduced in IR-P lungs as measured by reduced edema (wet/dry weight) and vascular leakage (BAL protein). In most cases, IR-P lungs performed better, with less injury than protective ventilation or perfusion alone. Conclusions: This protective approach of ventilation and perfusion after ischemia may improve lung function after transplantation, a simple method that could easily be applied clinically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1467-1473
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume25
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lung Injury
Reperfusion Injury
Reperfusion
Ventilation
Perfusion
Lung
Ischemia
Bronchoalveolar Lavage
Pressure
Wounds and Injuries
Cold Ischemia
Weights and Measures
Lung Transplantation
Pulmonary Artery
Blood Vessels
Edema
Arterial Pressure
Proteins
Transplantation
Gases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Attenuation of Lung Reperfusion Injury by Modified Ventilation and Reperfusion Techniques. / Singh, R. Ramesh; Laubach, Victor E.; Ellman, Peter I.; Reece, T. Brett; Unger, Eric; Kron, Irving L.; Tribble, Curtis G.

In: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Vol. 25, No. 12, 01.12.2006, p. 1467-1473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Singh, R. Ramesh ; Laubach, Victor E. ; Ellman, Peter I. ; Reece, T. Brett ; Unger, Eric ; Kron, Irving L. ; Tribble, Curtis G. / Attenuation of Lung Reperfusion Injury by Modified Ventilation and Reperfusion Techniques. In: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2006 ; Vol. 25, No. 12. pp. 1467-1473.
@article{8868b9f81bd54a678722ebbe3955792f,
title = "Attenuation of Lung Reperfusion Injury by Modified Ventilation and Reperfusion Techniques",
abstract = "Background: High ventilation and perfusion pressures after lung transplantation may have deleterious effects. We hypothesized that using combined protective approaches for ventilation and perfusion would be optimal for reducing injury and improving function after ischemia-reperfusion. Methods: Using an isolated, blood-perfused, rabbit lung model, lungs underwent 120 minutes of reperfusion either immediately (Sham) or after 18 hours of cold ischemia (IR). Groups Sham-P and IR-P underwent protective ventilation and reperfusion, and Groups Sham-C and IR-C underwent conventional ventilation and reperfusion. Protective ventilation involved gradually increasing the flow rate during 5 minutes to 1.8 liters/min, and conventional ventilation entailed immediate initiation of flow at 1.8 liters/min. Protective reperfusion involved gradually increasing perfusion during 5 minutes to 60 ml/min, and conventional reperfusion entailed immediate perfusion at 60 ml/min. Two other groups underwent either protective ventilation with conventional perfusion or vice versa. Airway pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and arterial blood gases were measured throughout reperfusion. Wet/dry weight, highest oxygenation index, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) protein were also measured. Results: Protective ventilation and perfusion after ischemia (IR-P) resulted in significant improvements in lung function as measured by increased Po2 and decreased Pco2, airway pressure, and highest oxygenation index compared with conventional reperfusion (IR-C). Injury was significantly reduced in IR-P lungs as measured by reduced edema (wet/dry weight) and vascular leakage (BAL protein). In most cases, IR-P lungs performed better, with less injury than protective ventilation or perfusion alone. Conclusions: This protective approach of ventilation and perfusion after ischemia may improve lung function after transplantation, a simple method that could easily be applied clinically.",
author = "Singh, {R. Ramesh} and Laubach, {Victor E.} and Ellman, {Peter I.} and Reece, {T. Brett} and Eric Unger and Kron, {Irving L.} and Tribble, {Curtis G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.healun.2006.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1467--1473",
journal = "Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation",
issn = "1053-2498",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attenuation of Lung Reperfusion Injury by Modified Ventilation and Reperfusion Techniques

AU - Singh, R. Ramesh

AU - Laubach, Victor E.

AU - Ellman, Peter I.

AU - Reece, T. Brett

AU - Unger, Eric

AU - Kron, Irving L.

AU - Tribble, Curtis G.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Background: High ventilation and perfusion pressures after lung transplantation may have deleterious effects. We hypothesized that using combined protective approaches for ventilation and perfusion would be optimal for reducing injury and improving function after ischemia-reperfusion. Methods: Using an isolated, blood-perfused, rabbit lung model, lungs underwent 120 minutes of reperfusion either immediately (Sham) or after 18 hours of cold ischemia (IR). Groups Sham-P and IR-P underwent protective ventilation and reperfusion, and Groups Sham-C and IR-C underwent conventional ventilation and reperfusion. Protective ventilation involved gradually increasing the flow rate during 5 minutes to 1.8 liters/min, and conventional ventilation entailed immediate initiation of flow at 1.8 liters/min. Protective reperfusion involved gradually increasing perfusion during 5 minutes to 60 ml/min, and conventional reperfusion entailed immediate perfusion at 60 ml/min. Two other groups underwent either protective ventilation with conventional perfusion or vice versa. Airway pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and arterial blood gases were measured throughout reperfusion. Wet/dry weight, highest oxygenation index, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) protein were also measured. Results: Protective ventilation and perfusion after ischemia (IR-P) resulted in significant improvements in lung function as measured by increased Po2 and decreased Pco2, airway pressure, and highest oxygenation index compared with conventional reperfusion (IR-C). Injury was significantly reduced in IR-P lungs as measured by reduced edema (wet/dry weight) and vascular leakage (BAL protein). In most cases, IR-P lungs performed better, with less injury than protective ventilation or perfusion alone. Conclusions: This protective approach of ventilation and perfusion after ischemia may improve lung function after transplantation, a simple method that could easily be applied clinically.

AB - Background: High ventilation and perfusion pressures after lung transplantation may have deleterious effects. We hypothesized that using combined protective approaches for ventilation and perfusion would be optimal for reducing injury and improving function after ischemia-reperfusion. Methods: Using an isolated, blood-perfused, rabbit lung model, lungs underwent 120 minutes of reperfusion either immediately (Sham) or after 18 hours of cold ischemia (IR). Groups Sham-P and IR-P underwent protective ventilation and reperfusion, and Groups Sham-C and IR-C underwent conventional ventilation and reperfusion. Protective ventilation involved gradually increasing the flow rate during 5 minutes to 1.8 liters/min, and conventional ventilation entailed immediate initiation of flow at 1.8 liters/min. Protective reperfusion involved gradually increasing perfusion during 5 minutes to 60 ml/min, and conventional reperfusion entailed immediate perfusion at 60 ml/min. Two other groups underwent either protective ventilation with conventional perfusion or vice versa. Airway pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and arterial blood gases were measured throughout reperfusion. Wet/dry weight, highest oxygenation index, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) protein were also measured. Results: Protective ventilation and perfusion after ischemia (IR-P) resulted in significant improvements in lung function as measured by increased Po2 and decreased Pco2, airway pressure, and highest oxygenation index compared with conventional reperfusion (IR-C). Injury was significantly reduced in IR-P lungs as measured by reduced edema (wet/dry weight) and vascular leakage (BAL protein). In most cases, IR-P lungs performed better, with less injury than protective ventilation or perfusion alone. Conclusions: This protective approach of ventilation and perfusion after ischemia may improve lung function after transplantation, a simple method that could easily be applied clinically.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845395521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845395521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healun.2006.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.healun.2006.09.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17178343

AN - SCOPUS:33845395521

VL - 25

SP - 1467

EP - 1473

JO - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

JF - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

SN - 1053-2498

IS - 12

ER -