Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke: Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use

Achala Vagal, Max Wintermark, Kambiz Nael, Andrew Bivard, Mark Parsons, Aaron W. Grossman, Pooja Khatri

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Recent positive trials have thrust acute cerebral perfusion imaging into the routine evaluation of acute ischemic stroke. Updated guidelines state that in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions presenting beyond 6 hours from time last known well, advanced imaging selection including perfusion-based selection is necessary. Centers that receive patients with acute stroke must now have the capability to perform and interpret CT or magnetic resonance perfusion imaging or provide rapid transfer to centers with the capability of selecting patients for a highly impactful endovascular therapy, particularly in delayed time windows. Many stroke centers are quickly incorporating the use of automated perfusion processing software to interpret perfusion raw data. As CT perfusion (CTP) is being assimilated in real-world clinical practice, it is essential to understand the basics of perfusion acquisition, quantification, and interpretation. It is equally important to recognize the common technical and clinical diagnostic challenges of automated CTP including ischemic core and penumbral misclassifications that could result in underestimation or overestimation of the core and penumbra volumes. This review highlights the pitfalls of automated CTP along with practical pearls to address the common challenges. This is particularly tailored to aid the acute stroke clinician who must interpret automated perfusion studies in an emergency setting to make time-dependent treatment decisions for patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)888-898
Number of pages11
JournalNeurology
Volume93
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 12 2019

Fingerprint

Perfusion Imaging
Perfusion
Stroke
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Emergencies
Software
Guidelines
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Vagal, A., Wintermark, M., Nael, K., Bivard, A., Parsons, M., Grossman, A. W., & Khatri, P. (2019). Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke: Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use. Neurology, 93(20), 888-898. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481

Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke : Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use. / Vagal, Achala; Wintermark, Max; Nael, Kambiz; Bivard, Andrew; Parsons, Mark; Grossman, Aaron W.; Khatri, Pooja.

In: Neurology, Vol. 93, No. 20, 12.11.2019, p. 888-898.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Vagal, A, Wintermark, M, Nael, K, Bivard, A, Parsons, M, Grossman, AW & Khatri, P 2019, 'Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke: Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use', Neurology, vol. 93, no. 20, pp. 888-898. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481
Vagal, Achala ; Wintermark, Max ; Nael, Kambiz ; Bivard, Andrew ; Parsons, Mark ; Grossman, Aaron W. ; Khatri, Pooja. / Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke : Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use. In: Neurology. 2019 ; Vol. 93, No. 20. pp. 888-898.
@article{599dd83310324d26a4b145e4649d9900,
title = "Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke: Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use",
abstract = "Recent positive trials have thrust acute cerebral perfusion imaging into the routine evaluation of acute ischemic stroke. Updated guidelines state that in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions presenting beyond 6 hours from time last known well, advanced imaging selection including perfusion-based selection is necessary. Centers that receive patients with acute stroke must now have the capability to perform and interpret CT or magnetic resonance perfusion imaging or provide rapid transfer to centers with the capability of selecting patients for a highly impactful endovascular therapy, particularly in delayed time windows. Many stroke centers are quickly incorporating the use of automated perfusion processing software to interpret perfusion raw data. As CT perfusion (CTP) is being assimilated in real-world clinical practice, it is essential to understand the basics of perfusion acquisition, quantification, and interpretation. It is equally important to recognize the common technical and clinical diagnostic challenges of automated CTP including ischemic core and penumbral misclassifications that could result in underestimation or overestimation of the core and penumbra volumes. This review highlights the pitfalls of automated CTP along with practical pearls to address the common challenges. This is particularly tailored to aid the acute stroke clinician who must interpret automated perfusion studies in an emergency setting to make time-dependent treatment decisions for patients with acute ischemic stroke.",
author = "Achala Vagal and Max Wintermark and Kambiz Nael and Andrew Bivard and Mark Parsons and Grossman, {Aaron W.} and Pooja Khatri",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "888--898",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke

T2 - Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use

AU - Vagal, Achala

AU - Wintermark, Max

AU - Nael, Kambiz

AU - Bivard, Andrew

AU - Parsons, Mark

AU - Grossman, Aaron W.

AU - Khatri, Pooja

PY - 2019/11/12

Y1 - 2019/11/12

N2 - Recent positive trials have thrust acute cerebral perfusion imaging into the routine evaluation of acute ischemic stroke. Updated guidelines state that in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions presenting beyond 6 hours from time last known well, advanced imaging selection including perfusion-based selection is necessary. Centers that receive patients with acute stroke must now have the capability to perform and interpret CT or magnetic resonance perfusion imaging or provide rapid transfer to centers with the capability of selecting patients for a highly impactful endovascular therapy, particularly in delayed time windows. Many stroke centers are quickly incorporating the use of automated perfusion processing software to interpret perfusion raw data. As CT perfusion (CTP) is being assimilated in real-world clinical practice, it is essential to understand the basics of perfusion acquisition, quantification, and interpretation. It is equally important to recognize the common technical and clinical diagnostic challenges of automated CTP including ischemic core and penumbral misclassifications that could result in underestimation or overestimation of the core and penumbra volumes. This review highlights the pitfalls of automated CTP along with practical pearls to address the common challenges. This is particularly tailored to aid the acute stroke clinician who must interpret automated perfusion studies in an emergency setting to make time-dependent treatment decisions for patients with acute ischemic stroke.

AB - Recent positive trials have thrust acute cerebral perfusion imaging into the routine evaluation of acute ischemic stroke. Updated guidelines state that in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions presenting beyond 6 hours from time last known well, advanced imaging selection including perfusion-based selection is necessary. Centers that receive patients with acute stroke must now have the capability to perform and interpret CT or magnetic resonance perfusion imaging or provide rapid transfer to centers with the capability of selecting patients for a highly impactful endovascular therapy, particularly in delayed time windows. Many stroke centers are quickly incorporating the use of automated perfusion processing software to interpret perfusion raw data. As CT perfusion (CTP) is being assimilated in real-world clinical practice, it is essential to understand the basics of perfusion acquisition, quantification, and interpretation. It is equally important to recognize the common technical and clinical diagnostic challenges of automated CTP including ischemic core and penumbral misclassifications that could result in underestimation or overestimation of the core and penumbra volumes. This review highlights the pitfalls of automated CTP along with practical pearls to address the common challenges. This is particularly tailored to aid the acute stroke clinician who must interpret automated perfusion studies in an emergency setting to make time-dependent treatment decisions for patients with acute ischemic stroke.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074872120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074872120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31636160

AN - SCOPUS:85074872120

VL - 93

SP - 888

EP - 898

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 20

ER -