Automotive retrofits in historic city centres and their potential effects on their walkability: a comparison of San Luis Obispo, CA, USA and Bath, England, UK

Beverly J. Bass, Margaret Livingston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Historic districts often contain retrofits to accommodate automotive infrastructure, primarily parking, that can negatively impact walkability. This research examines how various approaches to historic preservation and parking retrofits in two historic central districts (Bath and San Luis Obispo) impact walkability. Case study analysis, planning and historic conservation literature reviews, and walkability indicator observations were conducted for both sites. Results indicate that Bath limits surface parking in its historic core whereas San Luis Obispo has a greater degree of parking retrofits that reduces walkability. Walkability factors were lower for streets containing surface parking that disrupts the relationship between buildings and walkways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-304
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Urban Design
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2019

Fingerprint

parking
city center
district
building
conservation
infrastructure
planning
literature review
comparison
effect
city centre
England
Historic
Bath
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

@article{54bc50c224cf432d9d9f4cec8b8abbae,
title = "Automotive retrofits in historic city centres and their potential effects on their walkability: a comparison of San Luis Obispo, CA, USA and Bath, England, UK",
abstract = "Historic districts often contain retrofits to accommodate automotive infrastructure, primarily parking, that can negatively impact walkability. This research examines how various approaches to historic preservation and parking retrofits in two historic central districts (Bath and San Luis Obispo) impact walkability. Case study analysis, planning and historic conservation literature reviews, and walkability indicator observations were conducted for both sites. Results indicate that Bath limits surface parking in its historic core whereas San Luis Obispo has a greater degree of parking retrofits that reduces walkability. Walkability factors were lower for streets containing surface parking that disrupts the relationship between buildings and walkways.",
author = "Bass, {Beverly J.} and Margaret Livingston",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13574809.2018.1551055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "290--304",
journal = "Journal of Urban Design",
issn = "1357-4809",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automotive retrofits in historic city centres and their potential effects on their walkability

T2 - a comparison of San Luis Obispo, CA, USA and Bath, England, UK

AU - Bass, Beverly J.

AU - Livingston, Margaret

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - Historic districts often contain retrofits to accommodate automotive infrastructure, primarily parking, that can negatively impact walkability. This research examines how various approaches to historic preservation and parking retrofits in two historic central districts (Bath and San Luis Obispo) impact walkability. Case study analysis, planning and historic conservation literature reviews, and walkability indicator observations were conducted for both sites. Results indicate that Bath limits surface parking in its historic core whereas San Luis Obispo has a greater degree of parking retrofits that reduces walkability. Walkability factors were lower for streets containing surface parking that disrupts the relationship between buildings and walkways.

AB - Historic districts often contain retrofits to accommodate automotive infrastructure, primarily parking, that can negatively impact walkability. This research examines how various approaches to historic preservation and parking retrofits in two historic central districts (Bath and San Luis Obispo) impact walkability. Case study analysis, planning and historic conservation literature reviews, and walkability indicator observations were conducted for both sites. Results indicate that Bath limits surface parking in its historic core whereas San Luis Obispo has a greater degree of parking retrofits that reduces walkability. Walkability factors were lower for streets containing surface parking that disrupts the relationship between buildings and walkways.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058813545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058813545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13574809.2018.1551055

DO - 10.1080/13574809.2018.1551055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058813545

VL - 24

SP - 290

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Urban Design

JF - Journal of Urban Design

SN - 1357-4809

IS - 2

ER -