Backwards into the future: Neorepublicanism as a postsocialist critique of market society

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ARE CAPITALISTIC MARKETS LEGITIMATE? Two conceptions of moral legitimacy Socialism, understood as the rejection of markets based on private property in favor of comprehensive centralized economic planning, is no longer a serious political option. If the core of capitalism is the organization of the economy primarily through market competition based on private property, then capitalism has certainly defeated socialism. Markets have been accepted—and central planning abandoned—throughout most of the Third World and in most of the formerly Communist states. In the advanced industrial states of the West, Labor and “democratic socialist” parties have rejected socialism, by deregulating markets and privatizing industries, utilities, and transport. The U.K. Labour Parry's 1945 manifesto declared the party to be a “Socialist Party, and proud of it. Its ultimate aim is the establishment of the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain.” Today the Labour Party insists that markets are a given. So, have capitalism and markets triumphed? Are we all capitalists now, insofar as we all believe that capitalistic markets are a legitimate economic arrangement? The answer depends on what we mean by “legitimate.” We can distinguish two ways—instrumentally and intrinsically—in which legitimacy can be understood. On the instrumentalist view, markets are morally legitimate insofar as they are efficient means of producing desirable goods. Markets are morally desirable because, quite literally, they deliver the goods. It is this instrumental understanding of the legitimacy of markets that has become almost commonplace today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAfter Socialism
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages59-91
Number of pages33
ISBN (Print)9780511550102, 0521534984, 9780521534987
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Legitimacy
Capitalism
Socialism
Economics
Socialist Party
Labor
Planning
Private Property
Instrumentalist
Industry
Rejection
Labour Party
Conception
Communist
Commonplaces
Manifesto
Socialist
Commonwealth
Economy
Third World

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Backwards into the future : Neorepublicanism as a postsocialist critique of market society. / Gaus, Gerald F.

After Socialism. Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 59-91.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

@inbook{2beed6ef42694148b0dadf763901f7f6,
title = "Backwards into the future: Neorepublicanism as a postsocialist critique of market society",
abstract = "ARE CAPITALISTIC MARKETS LEGITIMATE? Two conceptions of moral legitimacy Socialism, understood as the rejection of markets based on private property in favor of comprehensive centralized economic planning, is no longer a serious political option. If the core of capitalism is the organization of the economy primarily through market competition based on private property, then capitalism has certainly defeated socialism. Markets have been accepted—and central planning abandoned—throughout most of the Third World and in most of the formerly Communist states. In the advanced industrial states of the West, Labor and “democratic socialist” parties have rejected socialism, by deregulating markets and privatizing industries, utilities, and transport. The U.K. Labour Parry's 1945 manifesto declared the party to be a “Socialist Party, and proud of it. Its ultimate aim is the establishment of the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain.” Today the Labour Party insists that markets are a given. So, have capitalism and markets triumphed? Are we all capitalists now, insofar as we all believe that capitalistic markets are a legitimate economic arrangement? The answer depends on what we mean by “legitimate.” We can distinguish two ways—instrumentally and intrinsically—in which legitimacy can be understood. On the instrumentalist view, markets are morally legitimate insofar as they are efficient means of producing desirable goods. Markets are morally desirable because, quite literally, they deliver the goods. It is this instrumental understanding of the legitimacy of markets that has become almost commonplace today.",
author = "Gaus, {Gerald F}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511550102.005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511550102",
pages = "59--91",
booktitle = "After Socialism",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Backwards into the future

T2 - Neorepublicanism as a postsocialist critique of market society

AU - Gaus, Gerald F

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - ARE CAPITALISTIC MARKETS LEGITIMATE? Two conceptions of moral legitimacy Socialism, understood as the rejection of markets based on private property in favor of comprehensive centralized economic planning, is no longer a serious political option. If the core of capitalism is the organization of the economy primarily through market competition based on private property, then capitalism has certainly defeated socialism. Markets have been accepted—and central planning abandoned—throughout most of the Third World and in most of the formerly Communist states. In the advanced industrial states of the West, Labor and “democratic socialist” parties have rejected socialism, by deregulating markets and privatizing industries, utilities, and transport. The U.K. Labour Parry's 1945 manifesto declared the party to be a “Socialist Party, and proud of it. Its ultimate aim is the establishment of the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain.” Today the Labour Party insists that markets are a given. So, have capitalism and markets triumphed? Are we all capitalists now, insofar as we all believe that capitalistic markets are a legitimate economic arrangement? The answer depends on what we mean by “legitimate.” We can distinguish two ways—instrumentally and intrinsically—in which legitimacy can be understood. On the instrumentalist view, markets are morally legitimate insofar as they are efficient means of producing desirable goods. Markets are morally desirable because, quite literally, they deliver the goods. It is this instrumental understanding of the legitimacy of markets that has become almost commonplace today.

AB - ARE CAPITALISTIC MARKETS LEGITIMATE? Two conceptions of moral legitimacy Socialism, understood as the rejection of markets based on private property in favor of comprehensive centralized economic planning, is no longer a serious political option. If the core of capitalism is the organization of the economy primarily through market competition based on private property, then capitalism has certainly defeated socialism. Markets have been accepted—and central planning abandoned—throughout most of the Third World and in most of the formerly Communist states. In the advanced industrial states of the West, Labor and “democratic socialist” parties have rejected socialism, by deregulating markets and privatizing industries, utilities, and transport. The U.K. Labour Parry's 1945 manifesto declared the party to be a “Socialist Party, and proud of it. Its ultimate aim is the establishment of the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain.” Today the Labour Party insists that markets are a given. So, have capitalism and markets triumphed? Are we all capitalists now, insofar as we all believe that capitalistic markets are a legitimate economic arrangement? The answer depends on what we mean by “legitimate.” We can distinguish two ways—instrumentally and intrinsically—in which legitimacy can be understood. On the instrumentalist view, markets are morally legitimate insofar as they are efficient means of producing desirable goods. Markets are morally desirable because, quite literally, they deliver the goods. It is this instrumental understanding of the legitimacy of markets that has become almost commonplace today.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932651331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932651331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511550102.005

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511550102.005

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84932651331

SN - 9780511550102

SN - 0521534984

SN - 9780521534987

SP - 59

EP - 91

BT - After Socialism

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -