Balancing Multiple Goals: Analyzing Votes on Free Trade Agreements in the U.S. House of Representatives

Jeffrey Kucik, Ashley Moraguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite increasing polarization in the House of Representatives, preferential trade agreements (PTAs) often pass not only with, but often because of, support from both parties. What explains these patterns? When do members cross party lines to support (or oppose) trade legislation? We argue that members are both ideologically and electorally motivated. Further, we argue that the relative balance of these incentives varies across the membership in meaningful ways. We examine House votes on 11 PTAs and find that ideology and district trade position have independent effects on support for free trade. We also find that the effect of trade position is conditioned by the ideology of the legislator; moderates are more responsive to their constituents' interests on trade.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-54
Number of pages26
JournalCongress and the Presidency
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing Multiple Goals: Analyzing Votes on Free Trade Agreements in the U.S. House of Representatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this