Battle of the water calibration networks

Avi Ostfeld, Elad Salomons, Lindell Ormsbee, James G. Uber, Christopher M. Bros, Paul Kalungi, Richard Burd, Boguslawa Zazula-Coetzee, Teddy Belrain, Doosun Kang, Kevin E Lansey, Hailiang Shen, Edward McBean, Zheng Yi Wu, Tom Walski, Stefano Alvisi, Marco Franchini, Joshua P. Johnson, Santosh R. Ghimire, Brian D. BarkdollTiit Koppel, Anatoli Vassiljev, Joong Hoon Kim, Gunhui Chung, Do Guen Yoo, Kegong Diao, Yuwen Zhou, Ji Li, Zilong Liu, Kui Chang, Jinliang Gao, Shaojian Qu, Yixing Yuan, T. Devi Prasad, Daniele Laucelli, Lydia S. Lyroudia Vamvakeridou, Zoran Kapelan, Dragan Savic, Luigi Berardi, Giuseppe Barbaro, Orazio Giustolisi, Masoud Asadzadeh, Bryan A. Tolson, Robert McKillop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Calibration is a process of comparing model results with field data and making the appropriate adjustments so that both results agree. Calibration methods can involve formal optimization methods or manual methods in which the modeler informally examines alternative model parameters. The development of a calibration framework typically involves the following: (1) definition of the model variables, coefficients, and equations; (2) selection of an objective function to measure the quality of the calibration; (3) selection of the set of data to be used for the calibration process; and (4) selection of an optimization/manual scheme for altering the coefficient values in the direction of reducing the objective function. Hydraulic calibration usually involves the modification of system demands, fine-tuning the roughness values of pipes, altering pump operation characteristics, and adjusting other model attributes that affect simulation results, in particular those that have significant uncertainty associated with their values. From the previous steps, it is clear that model calibration is neither unique nor a straightforward technical task. The success of a calibration process depends on the modeler's experience and intuition, as well as on the mathematical model and procedures adopted for the calibration process. This paper provides a summary of the Battle of theWater Calibration Networks (BWCN), the goal of which was to objectively compare the solutions of different approaches to the calibration of water distribution systems through application to a real water distribution system. Fourteen teams from academia, water utilities, and private consultants participated. The BWCN outcomes were presented and assessed at the 12th Water Distribution Systems Analysis conference in Tucson, Arizona, in September 2010. This manuscript summarizes the BWCN exercise and suggests future research directions for the calibration of water distribution systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-532
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume138
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

distribution system
Calibration
calibration
water
Water
Water distribution systems
Values
systems analysis
intuition
uncertainty
simulation
experience
roughness
pump
pipe
Tuning
Surface roughness
Systems analysis
Pipe
Hydraulics

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Model
  • Network
  • Optimization
  • Water distribution systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Ostfeld, A., Salomons, E., Ormsbee, L., Uber, J. G., Bros, C. M., Kalungi, P., ... McKillop, R. (2012). Battle of the water calibration networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(5), 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000191

Battle of the water calibration networks. / Ostfeld, Avi; Salomons, Elad; Ormsbee, Lindell; Uber, James G.; Bros, Christopher M.; Kalungi, Paul; Burd, Richard; Zazula-Coetzee, Boguslawa; Belrain, Teddy; Kang, Doosun; Lansey, Kevin E; Shen, Hailiang; McBean, Edward; Wu, Zheng Yi; Walski, Tom; Alvisi, Stefano; Franchini, Marco; Johnson, Joshua P.; Ghimire, Santosh R.; Barkdoll, Brian D.; Koppel, Tiit; Vassiljev, Anatoli; Kim, Joong Hoon; Chung, Gunhui; Yoo, Do Guen; Diao, Kegong; Zhou, Yuwen; Li, Ji; Liu, Zilong; Chang, Kui; Gao, Jinliang; Qu, Shaojian; Yuan, Yixing; Prasad, T. Devi; Laucelli, Daniele; Lyroudia Vamvakeridou, Lydia S.; Kapelan, Zoran; Savic, Dragan; Berardi, Luigi; Barbaro, Giuseppe; Giustolisi, Orazio; Asadzadeh, Masoud; Tolson, Bryan A.; McKillop, Robert.

In: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 138, No. 5, 2012, p. 523-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ostfeld, A, Salomons, E, Ormsbee, L, Uber, JG, Bros, CM, Kalungi, P, Burd, R, Zazula-Coetzee, B, Belrain, T, Kang, D, Lansey, KE, Shen, H, McBean, E, Wu, ZY, Walski, T, Alvisi, S, Franchini, M, Johnson, JP, Ghimire, SR, Barkdoll, BD, Koppel, T, Vassiljev, A, Kim, JH, Chung, G, Yoo, DG, Diao, K, Zhou, Y, Li, J, Liu, Z, Chang, K, Gao, J, Qu, S, Yuan, Y, Prasad, TD, Laucelli, D, Lyroudia Vamvakeridou, LS, Kapelan, Z, Savic, D, Berardi, L, Barbaro, G, Giustolisi, O, Asadzadeh, M, Tolson, BA & McKillop, R 2012, 'Battle of the water calibration networks', Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000191
Ostfeld A, Salomons E, Ormsbee L, Uber JG, Bros CM, Kalungi P et al. Battle of the water calibration networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 2012;138(5):523-532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000191
Ostfeld, Avi ; Salomons, Elad ; Ormsbee, Lindell ; Uber, James G. ; Bros, Christopher M. ; Kalungi, Paul ; Burd, Richard ; Zazula-Coetzee, Boguslawa ; Belrain, Teddy ; Kang, Doosun ; Lansey, Kevin E ; Shen, Hailiang ; McBean, Edward ; Wu, Zheng Yi ; Walski, Tom ; Alvisi, Stefano ; Franchini, Marco ; Johnson, Joshua P. ; Ghimire, Santosh R. ; Barkdoll, Brian D. ; Koppel, Tiit ; Vassiljev, Anatoli ; Kim, Joong Hoon ; Chung, Gunhui ; Yoo, Do Guen ; Diao, Kegong ; Zhou, Yuwen ; Li, Ji ; Liu, Zilong ; Chang, Kui ; Gao, Jinliang ; Qu, Shaojian ; Yuan, Yixing ; Prasad, T. Devi ; Laucelli, Daniele ; Lyroudia Vamvakeridou, Lydia S. ; Kapelan, Zoran ; Savic, Dragan ; Berardi, Luigi ; Barbaro, Giuseppe ; Giustolisi, Orazio ; Asadzadeh, Masoud ; Tolson, Bryan A. ; McKillop, Robert. / Battle of the water calibration networks. In: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 2012 ; Vol. 138, No. 5. pp. 523-532.
@article{ab15b05df4be468da9d576f581e6a396,
title = "Battle of the water calibration networks",
abstract = "Calibration is a process of comparing model results with field data and making the appropriate adjustments so that both results agree. Calibration methods can involve formal optimization methods or manual methods in which the modeler informally examines alternative model parameters. The development of a calibration framework typically involves the following: (1) definition of the model variables, coefficients, and equations; (2) selection of an objective function to measure the quality of the calibration; (3) selection of the set of data to be used for the calibration process; and (4) selection of an optimization/manual scheme for altering the coefficient values in the direction of reducing the objective function. Hydraulic calibration usually involves the modification of system demands, fine-tuning the roughness values of pipes, altering pump operation characteristics, and adjusting other model attributes that affect simulation results, in particular those that have significant uncertainty associated with their values. From the previous steps, it is clear that model calibration is neither unique nor a straightforward technical task. The success of a calibration process depends on the modeler's experience and intuition, as well as on the mathematical model and procedures adopted for the calibration process. This paper provides a summary of the Battle of theWater Calibration Networks (BWCN), the goal of which was to objectively compare the solutions of different approaches to the calibration of water distribution systems through application to a real water distribution system. Fourteen teams from academia, water utilities, and private consultants participated. The BWCN outcomes were presented and assessed at the 12th Water Distribution Systems Analysis conference in Tucson, Arizona, in September 2010. This manuscript summarizes the BWCN exercise and suggests future research directions for the calibration of water distribution systems.",
keywords = "Calibration, Model, Network, Optimization, Water distribution systems",
author = "Avi Ostfeld and Elad Salomons and Lindell Ormsbee and Uber, {James G.} and Bros, {Christopher M.} and Paul Kalungi and Richard Burd and Boguslawa Zazula-Coetzee and Teddy Belrain and Doosun Kang and Lansey, {Kevin E} and Hailiang Shen and Edward McBean and Wu, {Zheng Yi} and Tom Walski and Stefano Alvisi and Marco Franchini and Johnson, {Joshua P.} and Ghimire, {Santosh R.} and Barkdoll, {Brian D.} and Tiit Koppel and Anatoli Vassiljev and Kim, {Joong Hoon} and Gunhui Chung and Yoo, {Do Guen} and Kegong Diao and Yuwen Zhou and Ji Li and Zilong Liu and Kui Chang and Jinliang Gao and Shaojian Qu and Yixing Yuan and Prasad, {T. Devi} and Daniele Laucelli and {Lyroudia Vamvakeridou}, {Lydia S.} and Zoran Kapelan and Dragan Savic and Luigi Berardi and Giuseppe Barbaro and Orazio Giustolisi and Masoud Asadzadeh and Tolson, {Bryan A.} and Robert McKillop",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000191",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "523--532",
journal = "Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9496",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Battle of the water calibration networks

AU - Ostfeld, Avi

AU - Salomons, Elad

AU - Ormsbee, Lindell

AU - Uber, James G.

AU - Bros, Christopher M.

AU - Kalungi, Paul

AU - Burd, Richard

AU - Zazula-Coetzee, Boguslawa

AU - Belrain, Teddy

AU - Kang, Doosun

AU - Lansey, Kevin E

AU - Shen, Hailiang

AU - McBean, Edward

AU - Wu, Zheng Yi

AU - Walski, Tom

AU - Alvisi, Stefano

AU - Franchini, Marco

AU - Johnson, Joshua P.

AU - Ghimire, Santosh R.

AU - Barkdoll, Brian D.

AU - Koppel, Tiit

AU - Vassiljev, Anatoli

AU - Kim, Joong Hoon

AU - Chung, Gunhui

AU - Yoo, Do Guen

AU - Diao, Kegong

AU - Zhou, Yuwen

AU - Li, Ji

AU - Liu, Zilong

AU - Chang, Kui

AU - Gao, Jinliang

AU - Qu, Shaojian

AU - Yuan, Yixing

AU - Prasad, T. Devi

AU - Laucelli, Daniele

AU - Lyroudia Vamvakeridou, Lydia S.

AU - Kapelan, Zoran

AU - Savic, Dragan

AU - Berardi, Luigi

AU - Barbaro, Giuseppe

AU - Giustolisi, Orazio

AU - Asadzadeh, Masoud

AU - Tolson, Bryan A.

AU - McKillop, Robert

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Calibration is a process of comparing model results with field data and making the appropriate adjustments so that both results agree. Calibration methods can involve formal optimization methods or manual methods in which the modeler informally examines alternative model parameters. The development of a calibration framework typically involves the following: (1) definition of the model variables, coefficients, and equations; (2) selection of an objective function to measure the quality of the calibration; (3) selection of the set of data to be used for the calibration process; and (4) selection of an optimization/manual scheme for altering the coefficient values in the direction of reducing the objective function. Hydraulic calibration usually involves the modification of system demands, fine-tuning the roughness values of pipes, altering pump operation characteristics, and adjusting other model attributes that affect simulation results, in particular those that have significant uncertainty associated with their values. From the previous steps, it is clear that model calibration is neither unique nor a straightforward technical task. The success of a calibration process depends on the modeler's experience and intuition, as well as on the mathematical model and procedures adopted for the calibration process. This paper provides a summary of the Battle of theWater Calibration Networks (BWCN), the goal of which was to objectively compare the solutions of different approaches to the calibration of water distribution systems through application to a real water distribution system. Fourteen teams from academia, water utilities, and private consultants participated. The BWCN outcomes were presented and assessed at the 12th Water Distribution Systems Analysis conference in Tucson, Arizona, in September 2010. This manuscript summarizes the BWCN exercise and suggests future research directions for the calibration of water distribution systems.

AB - Calibration is a process of comparing model results with field data and making the appropriate adjustments so that both results agree. Calibration methods can involve formal optimization methods or manual methods in which the modeler informally examines alternative model parameters. The development of a calibration framework typically involves the following: (1) definition of the model variables, coefficients, and equations; (2) selection of an objective function to measure the quality of the calibration; (3) selection of the set of data to be used for the calibration process; and (4) selection of an optimization/manual scheme for altering the coefficient values in the direction of reducing the objective function. Hydraulic calibration usually involves the modification of system demands, fine-tuning the roughness values of pipes, altering pump operation characteristics, and adjusting other model attributes that affect simulation results, in particular those that have significant uncertainty associated with their values. From the previous steps, it is clear that model calibration is neither unique nor a straightforward technical task. The success of a calibration process depends on the modeler's experience and intuition, as well as on the mathematical model and procedures adopted for the calibration process. This paper provides a summary of the Battle of theWater Calibration Networks (BWCN), the goal of which was to objectively compare the solutions of different approaches to the calibration of water distribution systems through application to a real water distribution system. Fourteen teams from academia, water utilities, and private consultants participated. The BWCN outcomes were presented and assessed at the 12th Water Distribution Systems Analysis conference in Tucson, Arizona, in September 2010. This manuscript summarizes the BWCN exercise and suggests future research directions for the calibration of water distribution systems.

KW - Calibration

KW - Model

KW - Network

KW - Optimization

KW - Water distribution systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859988603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859988603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000191

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000191

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859988603

VL - 138

SP - 523

EP - 532

JO - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9496

IS - 5

ER -