Being forward not backward: Lexical limits to masked priming

Chris Davis, Jeesun Kim, Kenneth I Forster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated whether masked priming is mediated by existing memory representations by determining whether nonwords targets would show repetition priming. To avoid the potential confound that nonword repetition priming would be obscured by a familiarity response bias, the standard lexical decision and naming tasks were modified to make targets unfamiliar. Participants were required to read a target string from right to left (i.e., "ECAF" should be read as "FACE") and then make a response. To examine if priming was based on lexical representations, repetition primes consisted of words when read forwards or backwards (e.g., "face", "ecaf") and nonwords (e.g., "pame", "emap"). Forward and backward primes were used to test if task instruction affected prime encoding. The lexical decision and naming tasks showed the same pattern of results: priming only occurred for forward primes with word targets (e.g., "face-ECAF"). Additional experiments to test if response priming affected the LDT indicated that the lexical status of the prime per se did not affect target responses. These results showed that the encoding of masked primes was unaffected by the novel task instruction and support the view that masked priming is due to the automatic triggering of pre-established computational processes based on stored information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)673-684
Number of pages12
JournalCognition
Volume107
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Repetition Priming
instruction
experiment
trend
Masked Priming
Priming

Keywords

  • Masked priming
  • Word recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Being forward not backward : Lexical limits to masked priming. / Davis, Chris; Kim, Jeesun; Forster, Kenneth I.

In: Cognition, Vol. 107, No. 2, 05.2008, p. 673-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, Chris ; Kim, Jeesun ; Forster, Kenneth I. / Being forward not backward : Lexical limits to masked priming. In: Cognition. 2008 ; Vol. 107, No. 2. pp. 673-684.
@article{5bc06292b5f44bd5bcf6c31dcec424f4,
title = "Being forward not backward: Lexical limits to masked priming",
abstract = "This study investigated whether masked priming is mediated by existing memory representations by determining whether nonwords targets would show repetition priming. To avoid the potential confound that nonword repetition priming would be obscured by a familiarity response bias, the standard lexical decision and naming tasks were modified to make targets unfamiliar. Participants were required to read a target string from right to left (i.e., {"}ECAF{"} should be read as {"}FACE{"}) and then make a response. To examine if priming was based on lexical representations, repetition primes consisted of words when read forwards or backwards (e.g., {"}face{"}, {"}ecaf{"}) and nonwords (e.g., {"}pame{"}, {"}emap{"}). Forward and backward primes were used to test if task instruction affected prime encoding. The lexical decision and naming tasks showed the same pattern of results: priming only occurred for forward primes with word targets (e.g., {"}face-ECAF{"}). Additional experiments to test if response priming affected the LDT indicated that the lexical status of the prime per se did not affect target responses. These results showed that the encoding of masked primes was unaffected by the novel task instruction and support the view that masked priming is due to the automatic triggering of pre-established computational processes based on stored information.",
keywords = "Masked priming, Word recognition",
author = "Chris Davis and Jeesun Kim and Forster, {Kenneth I}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "673--684",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Being forward not backward

T2 - Lexical limits to masked priming

AU - Davis, Chris

AU - Kim, Jeesun

AU - Forster, Kenneth I

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - This study investigated whether masked priming is mediated by existing memory representations by determining whether nonwords targets would show repetition priming. To avoid the potential confound that nonword repetition priming would be obscured by a familiarity response bias, the standard lexical decision and naming tasks were modified to make targets unfamiliar. Participants were required to read a target string from right to left (i.e., "ECAF" should be read as "FACE") and then make a response. To examine if priming was based on lexical representations, repetition primes consisted of words when read forwards or backwards (e.g., "face", "ecaf") and nonwords (e.g., "pame", "emap"). Forward and backward primes were used to test if task instruction affected prime encoding. The lexical decision and naming tasks showed the same pattern of results: priming only occurred for forward primes with word targets (e.g., "face-ECAF"). Additional experiments to test if response priming affected the LDT indicated that the lexical status of the prime per se did not affect target responses. These results showed that the encoding of masked primes was unaffected by the novel task instruction and support the view that masked priming is due to the automatic triggering of pre-established computational processes based on stored information.

AB - This study investigated whether masked priming is mediated by existing memory representations by determining whether nonwords targets would show repetition priming. To avoid the potential confound that nonword repetition priming would be obscured by a familiarity response bias, the standard lexical decision and naming tasks were modified to make targets unfamiliar. Participants were required to read a target string from right to left (i.e., "ECAF" should be read as "FACE") and then make a response. To examine if priming was based on lexical representations, repetition primes consisted of words when read forwards or backwards (e.g., "face", "ecaf") and nonwords (e.g., "pame", "emap"). Forward and backward primes were used to test if task instruction affected prime encoding. The lexical decision and naming tasks showed the same pattern of results: priming only occurred for forward primes with word targets (e.g., "face-ECAF"). Additional experiments to test if response priming affected the LDT indicated that the lexical status of the prime per se did not affect target responses. These results showed that the encoding of masked primes was unaffected by the novel task instruction and support the view that masked priming is due to the automatic triggering of pre-established computational processes based on stored information.

KW - Masked priming

KW - Word recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41349114599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41349114599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 17765887

AN - SCOPUS:41349114599

VL - 107

SP - 673

EP - 684

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 2

ER -