Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning

Adam D Henry, Mark Lubell, Michael McCoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article uses exponential random graph models to investigate the roles of policy-relevant beliefs and social capital as drivers of network structure. The advocacy coalition framework argues that actors with similar policy beliefs are more likely to form coalitions, leading to policy subsystems fragmented into ideological groups. Social capital is defined as trust and norms of reciprocity, which helps cement cooperative relationships. Hypotheses are tested using survey data of policy elites involved in land-use and transportation planning in four regions of California. The findings suggest that coalitions of actors with similar belief systems are knit together by policy brokers seeking to build transitive social relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-444
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

regional planning
social capital
coalition
driver
subsystem
reciprocity
elite
land use
planning
Social capital
Regional planning
Network structure
Policy networks
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure : The case of California regional planning. / Henry, Adam D; Lubell, Mark; McCoy, Michael.

In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 21, No. 3, 07.2011, p. 419-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e3ee7f5f12f43ae913eb2459582a3f2,
title = "Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning",
abstract = "This article uses exponential random graph models to investigate the roles of policy-relevant beliefs and social capital as drivers of network structure. The advocacy coalition framework argues that actors with similar policy beliefs are more likely to form coalitions, leading to policy subsystems fragmented into ideological groups. Social capital is defined as trust and norms of reciprocity, which helps cement cooperative relationships. Hypotheses are tested using survey data of policy elites involved in land-use and transportation planning in four regions of California. The findings suggest that coalitions of actors with similar belief systems are knit together by policy brokers seeking to build transitive social relationships.",
author = "Henry, {Adam D} and Mark Lubell and Michael McCoy",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/jopart/muq042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "419--444",
journal = "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory",
issn = "1053-1858",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure

T2 - The case of California regional planning

AU - Henry, Adam D

AU - Lubell, Mark

AU - McCoy, Michael

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - This article uses exponential random graph models to investigate the roles of policy-relevant beliefs and social capital as drivers of network structure. The advocacy coalition framework argues that actors with similar policy beliefs are more likely to form coalitions, leading to policy subsystems fragmented into ideological groups. Social capital is defined as trust and norms of reciprocity, which helps cement cooperative relationships. Hypotheses are tested using survey data of policy elites involved in land-use and transportation planning in four regions of California. The findings suggest that coalitions of actors with similar belief systems are knit together by policy brokers seeking to build transitive social relationships.

AB - This article uses exponential random graph models to investigate the roles of policy-relevant beliefs and social capital as drivers of network structure. The advocacy coalition framework argues that actors with similar policy beliefs are more likely to form coalitions, leading to policy subsystems fragmented into ideological groups. Social capital is defined as trust and norms of reciprocity, which helps cement cooperative relationships. Hypotheses are tested using survey data of policy elites involved in land-use and transportation planning in four regions of California. The findings suggest that coalitions of actors with similar belief systems are knit together by policy brokers seeking to build transitive social relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960115478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960115478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jopart/muq042

DO - 10.1093/jopart/muq042

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960115478

VL - 21

SP - 419

EP - 444

JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

SN - 1053-1858

IS - 3

ER -