Benchmarking enhancements to a decision support system for global crop production assessments

Willem van Leeuwen, Chuck Hutchinson, Sam Drake, Brad Doorn, Verne Kaupp, Tim Haithcoat, Vladislav Likholetov, Ed Sheffner, Dave Tralli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Office of Global Analysis/International Production Assessment Division (OGA/IPAD) of the United States Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA-FAS) has been assimilating new data and information products from agencies such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) into its operational decision support system (DSS). The FAS mission is to improve monthly estimates of global production of major agricultural commodities and provide US Government senior decision makers and the public the most accurate, timely, and objective assessment of the global food supply situation possible. These estimates are ultimately captured as the US governments' official assessments of world food supply for the commodity markets and policy makers. The goal of this research was to measure changes in the quality and accuracy of decision support information resulting from the assimilation of new NASA products in the DSS. We gathered both qualitative and quantitative information through questionnaires and interviews to benchmark these changes. We used an interactive project lifecycle risk management tool developed for NASA mission spaceflight design and quality assurance (DDP - Defect Detection and Prevention) to do this. In this case, we used it to (1) quantify the change in DSS Objectives attained after assimilation of new products, and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of various Mitigation options against potential Risks. The change in Objectives attainment was considered the most important benchmarking indicator for examining the effectiveness of the assimilation of NASA products into OGA/IPAD's DSS. From this research emerged a novel model for benchmarking DSSs that (1) promotes continuity and synergy within and between government agencies, (2) accommodates scientific, operational and architectural dynamics, and (3) facilitates transfer of knowledge among research, management, and decision-making agencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8054-8065
Number of pages12
JournalExpert Systems with Applications
Volume38
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Decision support systems
Crops
NASA
Food supply
Project management
Risk management
Quality assurance
Agriculture
Decision making

Keywords

  • Agricultural production
  • Cross agency investments
  • Project management
  • Risk assessment
  • World food security

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Benchmarking enhancements to a decision support system for global crop production assessments. / van Leeuwen, Willem; Hutchinson, Chuck; Drake, Sam; Doorn, Brad; Kaupp, Verne; Haithcoat, Tim; Likholetov, Vladislav; Sheffner, Ed; Tralli, Dave.

In: Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 8054-8065.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

van Leeuwen, W, Hutchinson, C, Drake, S, Doorn, B, Kaupp, V, Haithcoat, T, Likholetov, V, Sheffner, E & Tralli, D 2011, 'Benchmarking enhancements to a decision support system for global crop production assessments', Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8054-8065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.145
van Leeuwen, Willem ; Hutchinson, Chuck ; Drake, Sam ; Doorn, Brad ; Kaupp, Verne ; Haithcoat, Tim ; Likholetov, Vladislav ; Sheffner, Ed ; Tralli, Dave. / Benchmarking enhancements to a decision support system for global crop production assessments. In: Expert Systems with Applications. 2011 ; Vol. 38, No. 7. pp. 8054-8065.
@article{90601f5bb96d4de08bd3afb8e8b175b3,
title = "Benchmarking enhancements to a decision support system for global crop production assessments",
abstract = "The Office of Global Analysis/International Production Assessment Division (OGA/IPAD) of the United States Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA-FAS) has been assimilating new data and information products from agencies such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) into its operational decision support system (DSS). The FAS mission is to improve monthly estimates of global production of major agricultural commodities and provide US Government senior decision makers and the public the most accurate, timely, and objective assessment of the global food supply situation possible. These estimates are ultimately captured as the US governments' official assessments of world food supply for the commodity markets and policy makers. The goal of this research was to measure changes in the quality and accuracy of decision support information resulting from the assimilation of new NASA products in the DSS. We gathered both qualitative and quantitative information through questionnaires and interviews to benchmark these changes. We used an interactive project lifecycle risk management tool developed for NASA mission spaceflight design and quality assurance (DDP - Defect Detection and Prevention) to do this. In this case, we used it to (1) quantify the change in DSS Objectives attained after assimilation of new products, and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of various Mitigation options against potential Risks. The change in Objectives attainment was considered the most important benchmarking indicator for examining the effectiveness of the assimilation of NASA products into OGA/IPAD's DSS. From this research emerged a novel model for benchmarking DSSs that (1) promotes continuity and synergy within and between government agencies, (2) accommodates scientific, operational and architectural dynamics, and (3) facilitates transfer of knowledge among research, management, and decision-making agencies.",
keywords = "Agricultural production, Cross agency investments, Project management, Risk assessment, World food security",
author = "{van Leeuwen}, Willem and Chuck Hutchinson and Sam Drake and Brad Doorn and Verne Kaupp and Tim Haithcoat and Vladislav Likholetov and Ed Sheffner and Dave Tralli",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "8054--8065",
journal = "Expert Systems with Applications",
issn = "0957-4174",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmarking enhancements to a decision support system for global crop production assessments

AU - van Leeuwen, Willem

AU - Hutchinson, Chuck

AU - Drake, Sam

AU - Doorn, Brad

AU - Kaupp, Verne

AU - Haithcoat, Tim

AU - Likholetov, Vladislav

AU - Sheffner, Ed

AU - Tralli, Dave

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - The Office of Global Analysis/International Production Assessment Division (OGA/IPAD) of the United States Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA-FAS) has been assimilating new data and information products from agencies such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) into its operational decision support system (DSS). The FAS mission is to improve monthly estimates of global production of major agricultural commodities and provide US Government senior decision makers and the public the most accurate, timely, and objective assessment of the global food supply situation possible. These estimates are ultimately captured as the US governments' official assessments of world food supply for the commodity markets and policy makers. The goal of this research was to measure changes in the quality and accuracy of decision support information resulting from the assimilation of new NASA products in the DSS. We gathered both qualitative and quantitative information through questionnaires and interviews to benchmark these changes. We used an interactive project lifecycle risk management tool developed for NASA mission spaceflight design and quality assurance (DDP - Defect Detection and Prevention) to do this. In this case, we used it to (1) quantify the change in DSS Objectives attained after assimilation of new products, and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of various Mitigation options against potential Risks. The change in Objectives attainment was considered the most important benchmarking indicator for examining the effectiveness of the assimilation of NASA products into OGA/IPAD's DSS. From this research emerged a novel model for benchmarking DSSs that (1) promotes continuity and synergy within and between government agencies, (2) accommodates scientific, operational and architectural dynamics, and (3) facilitates transfer of knowledge among research, management, and decision-making agencies.

AB - The Office of Global Analysis/International Production Assessment Division (OGA/IPAD) of the United States Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA-FAS) has been assimilating new data and information products from agencies such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) into its operational decision support system (DSS). The FAS mission is to improve monthly estimates of global production of major agricultural commodities and provide US Government senior decision makers and the public the most accurate, timely, and objective assessment of the global food supply situation possible. These estimates are ultimately captured as the US governments' official assessments of world food supply for the commodity markets and policy makers. The goal of this research was to measure changes in the quality and accuracy of decision support information resulting from the assimilation of new NASA products in the DSS. We gathered both qualitative and quantitative information through questionnaires and interviews to benchmark these changes. We used an interactive project lifecycle risk management tool developed for NASA mission spaceflight design and quality assurance (DDP - Defect Detection and Prevention) to do this. In this case, we used it to (1) quantify the change in DSS Objectives attained after assimilation of new products, and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of various Mitigation options against potential Risks. The change in Objectives attainment was considered the most important benchmarking indicator for examining the effectiveness of the assimilation of NASA products into OGA/IPAD's DSS. From this research emerged a novel model for benchmarking DSSs that (1) promotes continuity and synergy within and between government agencies, (2) accommodates scientific, operational and architectural dynamics, and (3) facilitates transfer of knowledge among research, management, and decision-making agencies.

KW - Agricultural production

KW - Cross agency investments

KW - Project management

KW - Risk assessment

KW - World food security

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952448023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952448023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.145

DO - 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.145

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952448023

VL - 38

SP - 8054

EP - 8065

JO - Expert Systems with Applications

JF - Expert Systems with Applications

SN - 0957-4174

IS - 7

ER -