Benefits of learning in negotiation

Dajun Zeng, Katia Sycara

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Negotiation has been extensively discussed in gametheoretic, economic, and management science literatures for decades. Recent growing interest in electronic commerce has given increased importance to automated negotiation. Evidence both from theoretical analysis and from observations of human interactions suggests that if decision makers can somehow take into consideration what other agents are thinking and furthermore learn during their interactions how other agents behave, their payoff might increase. In this paper, we propose a sequential decision making model of negotiation, called Bazaar. Within the proposed negotiation framework, we model learning as a Bayesian belief update process. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that learning is beneficial in sequential negotiation and present initial experimental results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Editors Anon
PublisherAAAI
Pages36-41
Number of pages6
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1997 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 97 - Providence, RI, USA
Duration: Jul 27 1997Jul 31 1997

Other

OtherProceedings of the 1997 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 97
CityProvidence, RI, USA
Period7/27/977/31/97

Fingerprint

Management science
Electronic commerce
Decision making
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software

Cite this

Zeng, D., & Sycara, K. (1997). Benefits of learning in negotiation. In Anon (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 36-41). AAAI.

Benefits of learning in negotiation. / Zeng, Dajun; Sycara, Katia.

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. ed. / Anon. AAAI, 1997. p. 36-41.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Zeng, D & Sycara, K 1997, Benefits of learning in negotiation. in Anon (ed.), Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, pp. 36-41, Proceedings of the 1997 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 97, Providence, RI, USA, 7/27/97.
Zeng D, Sycara K. Benefits of learning in negotiation. In Anon, editor, Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI. 1997. p. 36-41
Zeng, Dajun ; Sycara, Katia. / Benefits of learning in negotiation. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. editor / Anon. AAAI, 1997. pp. 36-41
@inproceedings{021593d0a32f4e9db384383166354f2f,
title = "Benefits of learning in negotiation",
abstract = "Negotiation has been extensively discussed in gametheoretic, economic, and management science literatures for decades. Recent growing interest in electronic commerce has given increased importance to automated negotiation. Evidence both from theoretical analysis and from observations of human interactions suggests that if decision makers can somehow take into consideration what other agents are thinking and furthermore learn during their interactions how other agents behave, their payoff might increase. In this paper, we propose a sequential decision making model of negotiation, called Bazaar. Within the proposed negotiation framework, we model learning as a Bayesian belief update process. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that learning is beneficial in sequential negotiation and present initial experimental results.",
author = "Dajun Zeng and Katia Sycara",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "36--41",
editor = "Anon",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence",
publisher = "AAAI",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Benefits of learning in negotiation

AU - Zeng, Dajun

AU - Sycara, Katia

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Negotiation has been extensively discussed in gametheoretic, economic, and management science literatures for decades. Recent growing interest in electronic commerce has given increased importance to automated negotiation. Evidence both from theoretical analysis and from observations of human interactions suggests that if decision makers can somehow take into consideration what other agents are thinking and furthermore learn during their interactions how other agents behave, their payoff might increase. In this paper, we propose a sequential decision making model of negotiation, called Bazaar. Within the proposed negotiation framework, we model learning as a Bayesian belief update process. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that learning is beneficial in sequential negotiation and present initial experimental results.

AB - Negotiation has been extensively discussed in gametheoretic, economic, and management science literatures for decades. Recent growing interest in electronic commerce has given increased importance to automated negotiation. Evidence both from theoretical analysis and from observations of human interactions suggests that if decision makers can somehow take into consideration what other agents are thinking and furthermore learn during their interactions how other agents behave, their payoff might increase. In this paper, we propose a sequential decision making model of negotiation, called Bazaar. Within the proposed negotiation framework, we model learning as a Bayesian belief update process. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that learning is beneficial in sequential negotiation and present initial experimental results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031363787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031363787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 36

EP - 41

BT - Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

A2 - Anon, null

PB - AAAI

ER -