Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: Effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model

Anna Dornhaus, Franziska Klügl, Christoph Oechslein, Frank Puppe, Lars Chittka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do some social insects have sophisticated recruitment systems, while other species do not communicate about food source locations at all? To answer this question, it is necessary to identify the social or ecological factors that make recruitment adaptive and thus likely to evolve. We developed an individual-based model of honey bee foraging to quantify the benefits of recruitment under different spatial distributions of nondepleting resource patches and with different colony sizes. Benefits of recruitment were strongly dependent on resource patch quality, density, and variability. Communication was especially beneficial if patches were poor, few, and variable. A sensitivity analysis of the model showed that under conditions of high resource density recruitment could even become detrimental, especially if foraging duration was short, tendency to scout was high, or recruits needed a long time to find communicated locations. Colony size, a factor often suspected to influence recruitment evolution, had no significant effect. These results may explain the recent experimental findings that in honey bees, benefits of waggle dance recruitment seem to vary seasonally and with habitat. They may also explain why some, but not other, species of social bees have evolved a strategy to communicate food locations to nest mates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-344
Number of pages9
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

individual-based model
Honey
Bees
honey
Ecology
bee
honey bees
ecology
Food
Ecosystem
Insects
Communication
resource
foraging
bee dances
social insect
food
social insects
effect
animal communication

Keywords

  • Apis mellifera
  • Communication
  • Foraging
  • Individual-based model
  • Social insects
  • Waggle dance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Benefits of recruitment in honey bees : Effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model. / Dornhaus, Anna; Klügl, Franziska; Oechslein, Christoph; Puppe, Frank; Chittka, Lars.

In: Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, p. 336-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dornhaus, Anna ; Klügl, Franziska ; Oechslein, Christoph ; Puppe, Frank ; Chittka, Lars. / Benefits of recruitment in honey bees : Effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model. In: Behavioral Ecology. 2006 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 336-344.
@article{e61ac550154347048a0e05567b9d7c10,
title = "Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: Effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model",
abstract = "Why do some social insects have sophisticated recruitment systems, while other species do not communicate about food source locations at all? To answer this question, it is necessary to identify the social or ecological factors that make recruitment adaptive and thus likely to evolve. We developed an individual-based model of honey bee foraging to quantify the benefits of recruitment under different spatial distributions of nondepleting resource patches and with different colony sizes. Benefits of recruitment were strongly dependent on resource patch quality, density, and variability. Communication was especially beneficial if patches were poor, few, and variable. A sensitivity analysis of the model showed that under conditions of high resource density recruitment could even become detrimental, especially if foraging duration was short, tendency to scout was high, or recruits needed a long time to find communicated locations. Colony size, a factor often suspected to influence recruitment evolution, had no significant effect. These results may explain the recent experimental findings that in honey bees, benefits of waggle dance recruitment seem to vary seasonally and with habitat. They may also explain why some, but not other, species of social bees have evolved a strategy to communicate food locations to nest mates.",
keywords = "Apis mellifera, Communication, Foraging, Individual-based model, Social insects, Waggle dance",
author = "Anna Dornhaus and Franziska Kl{\"u}gl and Christoph Oechslein and Frank Puppe and Lars Chittka",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1093/beheco/arj036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "336--344",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology",
issn = "1045-2249",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits of recruitment in honey bees

T2 - Effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model

AU - Dornhaus, Anna

AU - Klügl, Franziska

AU - Oechslein, Christoph

AU - Puppe, Frank

AU - Chittka, Lars

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Why do some social insects have sophisticated recruitment systems, while other species do not communicate about food source locations at all? To answer this question, it is necessary to identify the social or ecological factors that make recruitment adaptive and thus likely to evolve. We developed an individual-based model of honey bee foraging to quantify the benefits of recruitment under different spatial distributions of nondepleting resource patches and with different colony sizes. Benefits of recruitment were strongly dependent on resource patch quality, density, and variability. Communication was especially beneficial if patches were poor, few, and variable. A sensitivity analysis of the model showed that under conditions of high resource density recruitment could even become detrimental, especially if foraging duration was short, tendency to scout was high, or recruits needed a long time to find communicated locations. Colony size, a factor often suspected to influence recruitment evolution, had no significant effect. These results may explain the recent experimental findings that in honey bees, benefits of waggle dance recruitment seem to vary seasonally and with habitat. They may also explain why some, but not other, species of social bees have evolved a strategy to communicate food locations to nest mates.

AB - Why do some social insects have sophisticated recruitment systems, while other species do not communicate about food source locations at all? To answer this question, it is necessary to identify the social or ecological factors that make recruitment adaptive and thus likely to evolve. We developed an individual-based model of honey bee foraging to quantify the benefits of recruitment under different spatial distributions of nondepleting resource patches and with different colony sizes. Benefits of recruitment were strongly dependent on resource patch quality, density, and variability. Communication was especially beneficial if patches were poor, few, and variable. A sensitivity analysis of the model showed that under conditions of high resource density recruitment could even become detrimental, especially if foraging duration was short, tendency to scout was high, or recruits needed a long time to find communicated locations. Colony size, a factor often suspected to influence recruitment evolution, had no significant effect. These results may explain the recent experimental findings that in honey bees, benefits of waggle dance recruitment seem to vary seasonally and with habitat. They may also explain why some, but not other, species of social bees have evolved a strategy to communicate food locations to nest mates.

KW - Apis mellifera

KW - Communication

KW - Foraging

KW - Individual-based model

KW - Social insects

KW - Waggle dance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645720059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645720059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/beheco/arj036

DO - 10.1093/beheco/arj036

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645720059

VL - 17

SP - 336

EP - 344

JO - Behavioral Ecology

JF - Behavioral Ecology

SN - 1045-2249

IS - 3

ER -