Beyond Normativity in Sociocultural Reproduction and Sociocultural Transformation: Curriculum Work–Leadership Within an Evolving Context

Rose M Ylimaki, Lisa J. Fetman, Erin Matyjasik, Lynnette A Brunderman, Michael Uljens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this article is to examine the contributions, gaps, and normativity problems in mainstream sociocultural theories, curriculum theory, and educational leadership studies, considering reflective education theories that provide a less normative alternative. Framework: Our framework introduces reflective education for social change as a less normative perspective, contrasted with two dominant sociological perspectives: social reproduction and social transformation. Within each of these perspectives, we consider consonant curriculum theories and educational leadership studies that have developed in disparate fields. Research Methods/Approach: This study utilized data from a previous qualitative study that examined a high-performing high school/district in a working-class, increasingly diverse community. Data sources featured field notes and interviews. We acknowledge the limitations of the interpretive paradigm that framed this study, suggesting the need for a new research paradigm. Illustrative Examples From the Findings: Participants primarily considered education as preparatory for existing social norms and values through their long-standing curriculum system. Reliance on neoliberal policy discourses contributed to an institutionalized “culturally neutral” curriculum system that often reinforced deficit views of diverse students. Leaders had awareness of social changes but often missed opportunities for mediation and reflection. Thus, reflective education for social change may be useful to move beyond the normativity problems of social reproduction and transformation. Implications: When leaders apply reflective education perspectives to their praxis, they transcend existing norms and values. Importantly, the future is an open question, thus avoiding the normativity problems of dominant sociocultural perspectives. Implications are provided for theorizing, research, leadership preparation, and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-106
Number of pages37
JournalEducational Administration Quarterly
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

normativity
curriculum
curriculum theory
social change
leadership
education
Social Norms and Values
leader
paradigm
working class
mediation
research method
deficit
district
discourse
interview
school
community
Values
student

Keywords

  • changing demographics
  • changing policies
  • curriculum leadership
  • normativity
  • sociocultural theories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Beyond Normativity in Sociocultural Reproduction and Sociocultural Transformation : Curriculum Work–Leadership Within an Evolving Context. / Ylimaki, Rose M; Fetman, Lisa J.; Matyjasik, Erin; Brunderman, Lynnette A; Uljens, Michael.

In: Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 70-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{781beb57b3064427be64cf07be5784f9,
title = "Beyond Normativity in Sociocultural Reproduction and Sociocultural Transformation: Curriculum Work–Leadership Within an Evolving Context",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this article is to examine the contributions, gaps, and normativity problems in mainstream sociocultural theories, curriculum theory, and educational leadership studies, considering reflective education theories that provide a less normative alternative. Framework: Our framework introduces reflective education for social change as a less normative perspective, contrasted with two dominant sociological perspectives: social reproduction and social transformation. Within each of these perspectives, we consider consonant curriculum theories and educational leadership studies that have developed in disparate fields. Research Methods/Approach: This study utilized data from a previous qualitative study that examined a high-performing high school/district in a working-class, increasingly diverse community. Data sources featured field notes and interviews. We acknowledge the limitations of the interpretive paradigm that framed this study, suggesting the need for a new research paradigm. Illustrative Examples From the Findings: Participants primarily considered education as preparatory for existing social norms and values through their long-standing curriculum system. Reliance on neoliberal policy discourses contributed to an institutionalized “culturally neutral” curriculum system that often reinforced deficit views of diverse students. Leaders had awareness of social changes but often missed opportunities for mediation and reflection. Thus, reflective education for social change may be useful to move beyond the normativity problems of social reproduction and transformation. Implications: When leaders apply reflective education perspectives to their praxis, they transcend existing norms and values. Importantly, the future is an open question, thus avoiding the normativity problems of dominant sociocultural perspectives. Implications are provided for theorizing, research, leadership preparation, and practice.",
keywords = "changing demographics, changing policies, curriculum leadership, normativity, sociocultural theories",
author = "Ylimaki, {Rose M} and Fetman, {Lisa J.} and Erin Matyjasik and Brunderman, {Lynnette A} and Michael Uljens",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0013161X16669200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "70--106",
journal = "Educational Administration Quarterly",
issn = "0013-161X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Normativity in Sociocultural Reproduction and Sociocultural Transformation

T2 - Curriculum Work–Leadership Within an Evolving Context

AU - Ylimaki, Rose M

AU - Fetman, Lisa J.

AU - Matyjasik, Erin

AU - Brunderman, Lynnette A

AU - Uljens, Michael

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Background: The purpose of this article is to examine the contributions, gaps, and normativity problems in mainstream sociocultural theories, curriculum theory, and educational leadership studies, considering reflective education theories that provide a less normative alternative. Framework: Our framework introduces reflective education for social change as a less normative perspective, contrasted with two dominant sociological perspectives: social reproduction and social transformation. Within each of these perspectives, we consider consonant curriculum theories and educational leadership studies that have developed in disparate fields. Research Methods/Approach: This study utilized data from a previous qualitative study that examined a high-performing high school/district in a working-class, increasingly diverse community. Data sources featured field notes and interviews. We acknowledge the limitations of the interpretive paradigm that framed this study, suggesting the need for a new research paradigm. Illustrative Examples From the Findings: Participants primarily considered education as preparatory for existing social norms and values through their long-standing curriculum system. Reliance on neoliberal policy discourses contributed to an institutionalized “culturally neutral” curriculum system that often reinforced deficit views of diverse students. Leaders had awareness of social changes but often missed opportunities for mediation and reflection. Thus, reflective education for social change may be useful to move beyond the normativity problems of social reproduction and transformation. Implications: When leaders apply reflective education perspectives to their praxis, they transcend existing norms and values. Importantly, the future is an open question, thus avoiding the normativity problems of dominant sociocultural perspectives. Implications are provided for theorizing, research, leadership preparation, and practice.

AB - Background: The purpose of this article is to examine the contributions, gaps, and normativity problems in mainstream sociocultural theories, curriculum theory, and educational leadership studies, considering reflective education theories that provide a less normative alternative. Framework: Our framework introduces reflective education for social change as a less normative perspective, contrasted with two dominant sociological perspectives: social reproduction and social transformation. Within each of these perspectives, we consider consonant curriculum theories and educational leadership studies that have developed in disparate fields. Research Methods/Approach: This study utilized data from a previous qualitative study that examined a high-performing high school/district in a working-class, increasingly diverse community. Data sources featured field notes and interviews. We acknowledge the limitations of the interpretive paradigm that framed this study, suggesting the need for a new research paradigm. Illustrative Examples From the Findings: Participants primarily considered education as preparatory for existing social norms and values through their long-standing curriculum system. Reliance on neoliberal policy discourses contributed to an institutionalized “culturally neutral” curriculum system that often reinforced deficit views of diverse students. Leaders had awareness of social changes but often missed opportunities for mediation and reflection. Thus, reflective education for social change may be useful to move beyond the normativity problems of social reproduction and transformation. Implications: When leaders apply reflective education perspectives to their praxis, they transcend existing norms and values. Importantly, the future is an open question, thus avoiding the normativity problems of dominant sociocultural perspectives. Implications are provided for theorizing, research, leadership preparation, and practice.

KW - changing demographics

KW - changing policies

KW - curriculum leadership

KW - normativity

KW - sociocultural theories

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007162459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007162459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0013161X16669200

DO - 10.1177/0013161X16669200

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85007162459

VL - 53

SP - 70

EP - 106

JO - Educational Administration Quarterly

JF - Educational Administration Quarterly

SN - 0013-161X

IS - 1

ER -