Bioaerosol transport modeling and risk assessment in relation to biosolid placement

Scot E. Dowd, Charles P Gerba, Ian L Pepper, Suresh D. Pillai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A field study was performed in which bioaerosols were sampled at a field site undergoing land placement of anaerobically digested, de-watered biosolid material. The data from these field studies were then used to generate microbial release rates from the biosolids for use in modeling bioaerosol transport. Continuous-point sources represented by large biosolid piles (temporary storage before placement) in the field, and continuous-area sources represented by large fields upon which biosolids were placed by spraying, were modeled using microbial transport models; and downwind microbial concentrations were generated. These quantified transport data were then entered into microbial dose-response models in an attempt to characterize the risk of pathogenic bacteria and viruses infecting workers and nearby population centers. The risk of viral and bacterial infection to workers at biosolid land application sites is 3:100 and 2:100, respectively, under 2-m/s wind conditions and 1 hr of exposure. The route of exposure proposed in this model is the transport, inhalation, deposition, and swallowing of bacterial or viral pathogens. Note that these risk models by nature would tend to overestimate the actual risk to populations (wastewater workers) consisting primarily of immunocompetent individuals. Under these low-wind conditions, nearby population centers where such immunocompetent populations may exist (here considered to be 10 000 m from the land application sites) are predicted to be at little risk (1.95 x 10-2:100) of infection from aerosolized bacteria and at no risk from aerosolized viruses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-348
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Environmental Quality
Volume29
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Biosolids
biosolid
Risk assessment
risk assessment
modeling
Viruses
Bacteria
virus
bacterium
Pathogens
Spraying
Piles
point source
Wastewater
pile
pathogen
wastewater
land

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Bioaerosol transport modeling and risk assessment in relation to biosolid placement. / Dowd, Scot E.; Gerba, Charles P; Pepper, Ian L; Pillai, Suresh D.

In: Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 343-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35d98bf5d6304c9ebf5b5ddd19d1c38d,
title = "Bioaerosol transport modeling and risk assessment in relation to biosolid placement",
abstract = "A field study was performed in which bioaerosols were sampled at a field site undergoing land placement of anaerobically digested, de-watered biosolid material. The data from these field studies were then used to generate microbial release rates from the biosolids for use in modeling bioaerosol transport. Continuous-point sources represented by large biosolid piles (temporary storage before placement) in the field, and continuous-area sources represented by large fields upon which biosolids were placed by spraying, were modeled using microbial transport models; and downwind microbial concentrations were generated. These quantified transport data were then entered into microbial dose-response models in an attempt to characterize the risk of pathogenic bacteria and viruses infecting workers and nearby population centers. The risk of viral and bacterial infection to workers at biosolid land application sites is 3:100 and 2:100, respectively, under 2-m/s wind conditions and 1 hr of exposure. The route of exposure proposed in this model is the transport, inhalation, deposition, and swallowing of bacterial or viral pathogens. Note that these risk models by nature would tend to overestimate the actual risk to populations (wastewater workers) consisting primarily of immunocompetent individuals. Under these low-wind conditions, nearby population centers where such immunocompetent populations may exist (here considered to be 10 000 m from the land application sites) are predicted to be at little risk (1.95 x 10-2:100) of infection from aerosolized bacteria and at no risk from aerosolized viruses.",
author = "Dowd, {Scot E.} and Gerba, {Charles P} and Pepper, {Ian L} and Pillai, {Suresh D.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "343--348",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Quality",
issn = "0047-2425",
publisher = "ASA/CSSA/SSSA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bioaerosol transport modeling and risk assessment in relation to biosolid placement

AU - Dowd, Scot E.

AU - Gerba, Charles P

AU - Pepper, Ian L

AU - Pillai, Suresh D.

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - A field study was performed in which bioaerosols were sampled at a field site undergoing land placement of anaerobically digested, de-watered biosolid material. The data from these field studies were then used to generate microbial release rates from the biosolids for use in modeling bioaerosol transport. Continuous-point sources represented by large biosolid piles (temporary storage before placement) in the field, and continuous-area sources represented by large fields upon which biosolids were placed by spraying, were modeled using microbial transport models; and downwind microbial concentrations were generated. These quantified transport data were then entered into microbial dose-response models in an attempt to characterize the risk of pathogenic bacteria and viruses infecting workers and nearby population centers. The risk of viral and bacterial infection to workers at biosolid land application sites is 3:100 and 2:100, respectively, under 2-m/s wind conditions and 1 hr of exposure. The route of exposure proposed in this model is the transport, inhalation, deposition, and swallowing of bacterial or viral pathogens. Note that these risk models by nature would tend to overestimate the actual risk to populations (wastewater workers) consisting primarily of immunocompetent individuals. Under these low-wind conditions, nearby population centers where such immunocompetent populations may exist (here considered to be 10 000 m from the land application sites) are predicted to be at little risk (1.95 x 10-2:100) of infection from aerosolized bacteria and at no risk from aerosolized viruses.

AB - A field study was performed in which bioaerosols were sampled at a field site undergoing land placement of anaerobically digested, de-watered biosolid material. The data from these field studies were then used to generate microbial release rates from the biosolids for use in modeling bioaerosol transport. Continuous-point sources represented by large biosolid piles (temporary storage before placement) in the field, and continuous-area sources represented by large fields upon which biosolids were placed by spraying, were modeled using microbial transport models; and downwind microbial concentrations were generated. These quantified transport data were then entered into microbial dose-response models in an attempt to characterize the risk of pathogenic bacteria and viruses infecting workers and nearby population centers. The risk of viral and bacterial infection to workers at biosolid land application sites is 3:100 and 2:100, respectively, under 2-m/s wind conditions and 1 hr of exposure. The route of exposure proposed in this model is the transport, inhalation, deposition, and swallowing of bacterial or viral pathogens. Note that these risk models by nature would tend to overestimate the actual risk to populations (wastewater workers) consisting primarily of immunocompetent individuals. Under these low-wind conditions, nearby population centers where such immunocompetent populations may exist (here considered to be 10 000 m from the land application sites) are predicted to be at little risk (1.95 x 10-2:100) of infection from aerosolized bacteria and at no risk from aerosolized viruses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033955182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033955182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033955182

VL - 29

SP - 343

EP - 348

JO - Journal of Environmental Quality

JF - Journal of Environmental Quality

SN - 0047-2425

IS - 1

ER -